Vote for life

Election Day offers voters clear choices on a variety of important issues. The election will determine whether we as a country continue to head down the road toward European socialism or instead embrace free markets; whether we have a smaller or larger federal government; and whether we embrace a confident foreign policy or continue to surrender to the jihadists.

But at least as important is the decision about whether we will continue to slaughter millions of innocents or welcome them into the world and protect them under the law.

~ Gary Bauer, Human Events, November 5

Glory and power be to You, the only wise King

I awakened today to this song playing in my head…

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FObjd5wrgZ8[/youtube]

Hallelujah. No matter what happens today,

Holy, Holy, Holy
Is the Lord God Almighty
Who was, and is, and is to come,
With all creation I sing:
Praise to the King of Kings!
You are my everything,
And – I – will – adore YOU

Dear God,

Please have mercy on us. We don’t deserve it. But please help us. Please stop the angel of death who currently occupies the White House, who supports the unfettered murders of little babies made in Your image, and who shows contempt for your first chosen people, Israel.

That said, whatever outcome of the election You decide today I accept is the best decision, according to Your plan. I trust You. I love you.

Jill

Viral video: Unscripted Romney passionately advocates pro-life position

A rereleased video from 2007 that shows a clearly incensed Mitt Romney giving Iowa Newsradio WHO talk show host Jan Mickelsons an off-air piece of his mind has “become a viral sensation,” garnering over 1.8 million hits in just five days.

Romney, then a presidential candidate in the 2008 election cycle, took offense to questions during the interview about his Mormon faith and converting from pro-abortion to pro-life.

Headlines since yesterday are focused on how “testy” Romney became about the tenets of Mormonism. My take-away was, “Wow, this guy is passionately pro-life”….

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TxMD02zU9SE[/youtube]

Romney later said he did not know he was being videotaped. I found his description of the Second Coming fascinating, but here were the key excerpts on the life issue:

Romney: But you’re not giving me the opportunity to explain to you that my faith has very strong beliefs that if I commit an abortion, encourage an abortion… I was beaten up in Boston because I pointed out time and again that I encouraged girls not to get abortions, that I told them to have adoptions. I have never done anything that in any way violates the principles of my Church -  in that regard, I’ve made other mistakes – but in that regard.

But the Church does not say that a member of our Church has to be apposed to allowing choice in society. It does not say that. And therefore, there are Mormon Democrats. There’s a Democratic party in Massa… in Utah, filled with Mormons, and the Church doesn’t say they’re wrong, they’re being excommunicated. No, it says, look, we are vehemently apposed to abortion, ourselves, and for ourselves. But we allow other people to make their own choice. I disagree with that view. Politically, I looked and said, you know what, that’s wrong.  And its not a Mormon thing, it’s a secular position to say you know what, I was wrong, we should have as a society a prohibition on abortion in the following circumstances. But its not violating my faith, let me assure you.

Mickelson: I hope we can do this, and we we can spend some quality time on the air rather than the sound bites.

Romney: No, I mean I don’t like coming  on the air, and having you go after my Church, and me and my-

Mickelson: I’m not going after your Church.

Romney: I know, that’s right, but I’m not running as a Mormon. And I get a little tired of coming on a show like yours and having it all about Mormon.

Mickelson: See, I don’t mind it being about that.

Romney: I do. I do.

Mickelson: I agree with the ethics of your Church, for Pete’s sake.

Romney, getting up to leave: So do I. So do I.

Mickelson: I was trying…

Romney: No you’re trying to tell me that I’m not a faithful Mormon or that I’m not [inaudible] my Church.

Mickelson: No I’m trying to get you to reconcile what I think is a disparity.

Romney: And have a great discussion about Mormonism, and the Mormon Church, and reading the doctrines of the Church, and where my view is, and you know what, I’m not running to talk about Mormonism.

Mickelson: Yeah, but the point is the people who are likely to vote, don’t want to elect a Ted Kennedy, who comes back – or a Senator Harkin – who comes here to Dowling, and comes here to Iowa, and says, “I’m pro-life,” and then when he gets to Washington stands up and becomes pro-choice.

Romney: Here is your opportunity to have that settled in your mind. I was governor four years. This is not just what I’m talking about. I was governor  four years. I had a number of pieces of legislation that came to my desk that dealt with abortion, abstinence education, RU-486, and so forth. I vetoed any bill that was in favor of choice. I was entirely consistent in favor of life. And so it’s not just my word that you have to take. Look at my record.

Akin gets 11th hour help from Republican deep pockets

Internal polling must be showing that Missouri U.S. Senate candidate Todd Akin has a good shot of beating the odds and defeating Claire McCaskill, because altogether Republicans are pouring $2 million into end game ads for the beleaguered pro-life candidate.

Of course, had Republicans not freaked out and abandoned him, would be in a much better place following his unfortunate explanation on August 19 as to why he opposed a rape/incest exception.

The establishment hurt him two ways: bad-mouthing him publicly and withdrawing financial help. By so doing they shot themselves in the foot by weakening their changes of retaking the Senate.

Nevertheless, in the 2-1/2 months Akin has had to go it alone, he hasn’t drowned. The last pre-election poll taken, by Public Policy Polling on November 4, has him down by only 4 points – on an upward trend:

PPP’s final Missouri poll finds Claire McCaskill holding on to a narrow lead over Todd Akin, 48-44. Libertarian Jonathan Dine is polling at 6%. Since our last poll two weeks ago McCaskill’s gained 2 points, while Akin’s seen a 4 point increase in his support.

Akin’s image isn’t getting any better. He now has a 29% favorability rating with 56% of voters rating him unfavorably, the worst numbers we’ve found for him to date. Nevertheless Republicans are starting to unify around him a little bit more as the election approaches- he’s gone from getting 74% of his party vote on our last poll to now 79%. He’s also pulled even with independents at 46%, although he’s still running 19 points behind Mitt Romney on that front.

“The big x factor in the Missouri Senate race is Jonathan Dine,” said Dean Debnam, President of PPP. “He’s pulling a lot of support from people who would otherwise vote Republican. If they stick with him, then McCaskill will win. But if they decide their desire for a GOP controlled Senate outweighs their disgust with Akin, then Akin will have a chance to pull the upset.”

A St. Louis Post-Dispatch poll conducted October 23-25 showed the gap was even narrower – just two points:

Congressman Todd Akin has dramatically narrowed the lead of Sen. Claire McCaskill in Missouri’s nationally watched Senate race, according to a new poll.

The results show McCaskill leading with 45 percentage points to Akin’s 43 points among likely voters. That’s within the poll’s 4-point margin for error….

The Post-Dispatch poll found an unusually high 9% calling themselves undecided, less than two weeks out from the Nov. 6 election.

Republican internal polling must be showing such an upset is indeed possible, because Republicans are giving Akin last minute help.

The Now or Never PAC, which announced on October 31 it had made an  $800,000 television ad buy on Akin’s behalf, quickly bumped that up to $1 million a day later. The ad obviously has indecideds, Dine supporters, and Romney supporters all in mind. It’s a great ad…

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Olwshb08htY[/youtube]

It also appears either the Republican National Committee or the Republican National Senatorial Committee has quietly given Akin belated financial support. From Politico, October 31:

Akin and the Missouri Republican Party are launching a nearly $700,000 TV ad blitz in the closing days of his challenge to… McCaskill, but the source of the funds for the effort is unclear.

These are the first ads run by the Missouri GOP in conjunction with Akin’s campaign. Of the total, $386,000 will come from the Missouri GOP to pay for the ad run, with the remaining supplied by Akin’s committee.

The NRSC declined repeatedly to comment on whether it is the source of the funds being used by the Missouri GOP on Akin’s behalf. Previously, the committee has insisted it would stay out of the race.

However, only national committees – the NRSC or the RNC – or individual campaign committees that raise money in compliance with federal limits are permitted to shift funds to a state party for a coordinated ad buy.

A spokesman for the Missouri GOP said it does not comment on its advertising strategy. The RNC could not be reached for comment.

Here’s that ad, featuring two women, a rape victim and a Russian immigrant…

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=doY2YSU8FBY[/youtube]

This ad is obviously appealing tom women, which the St. Louis Post-Dispatch noted in its poll had flocked to McCaskill, even while flocking to Romney, which means they are pliable:

A bright spot for McCaskill is the women’s vote, where she is ahead of Akin by nearly 10 points, although the margin of error is higher when the results are broken out by demographics. Still, the lead is more significant than it might appear at first because it’s in a state where Romney is leading Obama among those same female respondents.

“There is a big group of women there who have committed to Romney in the presidential race but are going to stick with McCaskill” in the Senate race, said Coker. “That’s the difference between Akin winning this race and Akin losing this race.”

[Photo via KSDK.com]

Pro-life video of the day: Black Christian explains why he opposes Obama

by LauraLoo

Meet William, an African-American Christian whose strong convictions against the murder of innocent life through abortion and “the #1 kill of African-Americans,” make it impossible for him to vote for President Obama.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3c0Lb9Mqdw[/youtube]

“Mr. President, I have to side with the Bible… I have a higher allegiance to Jesus than I do to the Democratic Party.”

Email dailyvid@jillstanek.com with your video suggestions.

[HT: Jill]

Pro-life heckler “totally throws Obama’s game” at Sunday campaign stop

News reports are noting only one item of interest from President Obama’s campaign stop in Cincinnati yesterday, one of the “precious few” stops he has left before tomorrow, Election Day.

And that is a pro-life heckler who “totally hijacked” the rally, followed by another one. As a result, “Barack Obama was totally thrown off his game.”

No justice, no peace. Let that reminder of the gravity of this election stick in the minds of voters going to the polls tomorrow.

From The Blaze:

The chaos unfolded when a man began shouting from the rafters moments after the president commenced his speech… [A]s he shouted, the man held up a sign that featured graphic anti-abortion images.

Continued Yahoo News:

[B]ut the crowd of 13,500 drowned him out with a chant of “Four more years!” The incident forced the president to stop his speech and the man continued shouting until five police offers hauled him out of the arena. When Obama began speaking again, another man on the other side of the arena tried to shout him down again, but was quickly escorted out.

“These might have been some Tennessee Titans fans who were mad about the Bears beating them really badly today,” Obama joked, before resuming his speech.

Seems to me Obama had to have known what the protest was about and chose to totally ignore it.

Here’s the video:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MUE5KmWURmQ[/youtube]

More from Yahoo:

While he played the piano, [Stevie] Wonder went on to discuss abortion policy before continuing his set.

“Men are making an issue about the woman’s body,” Wonder said. “The reality is, I know – and all us men in here know – that if women were taking control of our bodies making decisions, we wouldn’t like that. Is this too real or can you handle it?”

With that, he and his band perform “A Time to Love.”

Ah, the voice of reason and love. Let we men get women pregnant and then abdicate responsibility for the created child to let her murder it. That’s indeed love.

Nightmare future: Top Ten worst rulings by an Obama-stacked Supreme Court

Curt Levey of the Committee for Justice published a truly frightening post at Breitbart.com on November 3, “Obama Supreme Court is the stuff of nightmares.” Levey is an attorney and an expert on the U.S. Supreme Court.

While attention has been given to the consequences of an Obama re-election to the Supreme Court, Levey lays out the actual future, and it would be devastating. The America we are trying to hold on to would be gone.

Levey spells it out:

Here are the sobering facts. There are already four solid liberals among the nine Justices on the Court.  Of the five center-right Justices, two – Kennedy and Scalia – will turn 80 in the final year of a second Obama term.  Should either retire or die, Obama will put a reliable liberal on the Court (no Democratic president has failed to do so since JFK).  The result will be a liberal majority on the Court that can do whatever it wants, unrestrained by the precedent and constitutional text that conservative judges look to….

Think about it: if Obama is re-elected, there’s a 75% chance of a return to the ultra-liberal Warren Court era that began with Earl Warren’s appointment as Chief Justice and persisted, past Warren’s 1969 retirement, into the 1970’s.  During that time, the Supreme Court gave us Roe v. Wade, school busing, a ban on the death penalty, and a radical separation of church and state, to name just a few of the Court’s activist excesses.  The Obama Court would probably be like the Warren Court on steroids….

To give people a better feel for what this would mean for America, I looked at the sort of decisions an Obama Supreme Court might issue.  I narrowed them down to the ten worst rulings we might plausibly see:

TOP TEN WORST SUPREME COURT RULINGS IF OBAMA IS RE-ELECTED

#10 – A ban on voter ID laws, making it impossible to stop voter fraud.

#9 – Carte blanche for hate-speech laws that ban videos and other expression deemed offensive to Muslims and other minorities.

#8 – Abolition of the death penalty.

#7 – A prohibition on tuition vouchers being used for religious schools, crippling the school choice movement.

#6 – Elimination of all legal limits on racial preferences for minorities.

#5 – A requirement for taxpayer-funding of abortions through the third trimester of pregnancy.

#4 – Invention of a constitutional right to gay marriage that would trump all state laws and religious objections.

#3 – Striking down, as unconstitutional discrimination, any serious attempt to curtail the flow of illegal immigrants into the country or to deny them government benefits.

#2 – Elimination of an individual right to possess firearms.

#1 – Enshrinement of welfare and government-provided healthcare as constitutional rights, thus fulfilling Barack Obama’s dream of a Supreme Court willing to bring about “redistribution of wealth” by “break[ing] free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution.” (quoting 2001 PBS interview with Obama)]

[Top photo via Breitbart.com]

Cher, Kathy Griffin urge vote against Romney and pro-life “sick stuff”

Cher: Honestly this is sick stuff. Richard Mourdock thinks pregnancy resulting from rape is a gift from God…. So ladies in Des Moines, voters in Madison, voters in Portsmouth, voters in Fort Lauderdale, voters in Cleveland, we need you to do something for your country. We need you to come together, protect women’s rights. So on November 6, go and vote….

Griffin: I mean, this is Cher, b****es, do what she says! And God bless America.

~ Celebrity Kathy Griffin alongside Cher, pleading with viewers to help save abortion by voting for Barack Obama, Actually, November 2. View video at link.

[HT: Hot Air]


Who Is Jill Stanek?

Jill Stanek is a nurse turned speaker, columnist and blogger, a national figure in the effort to protect both preborn and postborn innocent human life.

Read Jill's full bio »
What the Media says »

  • May 2016
  • December 2015
  • October 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005

  • Categories
  • Stanek Top 20

    Latest Posts

    Latest Comments