The Censorship Doctrine
“Pro-choice.” Blah blah.
The Left’s reintroduction of legislation called the Fairness Doctrine is another of their blatant attempts to squelch choice, this time by forcing liberal doctrine on Americans, payback for the failure of Air America, someone said.
This would affect the Internet, as Adam Thierer from the City Journal explained:

Scarcity-obsessed Dennis Kucinich has recently introduced plans in Congress to revive the Fairness Doctrine, which once let government regulators police the airwaves to ensure a balancing of viewpoints, however that’s defined. A new Fairness Doctrine would affect most directly opinion-based talk radio, a medium that just happens to be dominated by conservatives. If a station wanted to run William Bennett’s show under such a regime, they might now have to broadcast a left-wing alternative, too, even if it had poor ratings, which generally has been the case with liberal talk….
Sunstein also proposes a kind of speech redistributionism. For the Internet, he suggests that regulators could impose “electronic sidewalks” on partisan websites (the National Rifle Association’s, say), forcing them to link to opposing views….
That leftist media critics start sounding so authoritarian is no surprise. In a media cornucopia, freedom of choice inevitably yields media inequality…. Overcoming that inequality would require a completely regulated media.
When Rush Limbaugh has more listeners than NPR, or Tom Clancy sells more books than Noam Chomsky, or Motor Trend gets more subscribers than Mother Jones, liberals want to convince us (or themselves, perhaps) that it’s all because of some catastrophic market failure or a grand corporate conspiracy to dumb down the masses.
In reality, it’s just the result of consumer choice. All the opinions that the Left’s media critics favor are now readily available to us via multiple platforms. But that’s not good enough, it seems: they won’t rest until all of us are watching, reading, and listening to the content that they prefer.
Friend Ed Moore emailed the latest cable news ratings this morning, with this note:
… Because CNN has been around so long most assume it is among the leaders in viewership. As you can see, this is false. The numbers below are not aberrational. They are typical and have been that way for years…. Fox News shows consistently cream the opposition…. That is why they are berated and denegrated by the libs and the rest of the media.
O’Reilly and Hannity obliterate shows like Chris Mathews’ Hardball, but the media does everything it can to treat Mathews as important and the others as irrelevant or fringe….
People are leaving traditional media, the networks and newspapers, in droves, mostly because of their liberal bias in reporting. The libs are fighting back with plans to regulate the media with legislation like the Fairness Doctrine, which is anything but fair. It is blatant censorship from a group who pretends to be the protectors of all things “fair.”
(Click to enlarge.)
![]()
![]()
Does 2 + 2 = 4? If conservative thinking is so popular, does that not include pro-life thinking?



Intereesting….
The MSM has admitted many times over they promote a liberal agenda.
Now the leftists are acting like children on a playground as they now feel threatened that the underdogs have a stacked team and are coming on strong.
I tried listening to AIRHEAD AMERICA and fell asleep to the droning of Al Franken. I guess he just wasn’t “good enough”, “smart enough”, “and doggoneit people DIDN’T like him”
To quote Cameron:
WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA WAAAAAAAAAAAA
LMAO!!!!
Finally conservatives have found their place and are now finally getting their equal time which has been long overdue.
Trent Lott is leading the charge against conservative radio since they made a circus out of his stand on the immigration issue. Not exactly liberal.
Ah.. .looks like someone is reading the Drudge Report now for her ideas–the ratings thing.
People are leaving the cable news because of the internet… leaving behind the elderly, illiterate, and those absent a capacity to use a computer (i.e. Fox News viewers). Also like Jill with her presumed pro-life v. pro-choice trends, the cut n paste here is attempting to sugest a trend, using one snap shot, towards Fox, audiences supposedly having been repelled by liberal bias, but Fox’s ratings have been steadily dropping too since 2005. However resistant to change their inept and ignorant audience is, they’re slowly catching on and also leaving in droves. O’Reilly last half a million viewers last month alone. Finaly, Fox makes a great case for Fairness Doctrine, as it’s viewers, according to surveys, are the most ignorant audience gracing the cable news feeds. Sometimes you have to make the kids go to school if you want them to learn and know anything.
I have to agree with Cameron on this one…I hardly know of any college-age students who resort to the TV for news. I get all of mine from the internet…and to be honest, I avoid
Fox News like the plague. The technologically-savvy generally flock to the easiest news source available, the internet; they usually are of the more liberal variety. Why would the liberals really have to care when they basically control the most important and up-coming source for information…the internet? With TV, one must wait for the good stories to come on…with the internet, all your interests are a click away.
I really have to say, I think both the conservatives and liberals are making too big a deal of this. Let the conservatives have their outdated TV and radio…the internet is quickly outstripping their influence.
I use the net for most of my news too. Though on TV? I watch both liberal and conservative shows. The liberal ones so I can agree with something and the conservative ones because I like gettting frustrated over the nonsense they spout. Especially Sean Hannity. If there is a hell, that man would be going to it.
The point is to allow the free market to decide, not government regulation, be it dominated by liberals or conservatives.
You mention the Internet. I agree it’s having a huge influence, particularly on newspapers. The blogs are likewise gaining in influence.
Cameron said: “Fox makes a great case for Fairness Doctrine, as it’s viewers, according to surveys, are the most ignorant audience gracing the cable news feeds.”
Prove that, Cameron.
I have mixed feelings about the fairness doctrine is it will, no matter how well it’s done, still inadvertently have some dampening effects on free speech. I don’t think we need an equally liberal program for each apparent conservative program, but I do think that such programs should identify themselves as such and not pretend to be “fair and ballanced” objective journalism. I also have no problem with self-described “news” programming being held to that standard of presenting both sides of the story and/or justifying why they cannot (i.e. we invited so and so, but they refused to comment).
In short, one wonders what the big deal is with people like you Jill, if Fox News is indeed fair and objective. What are you scared of?
Several research efforts find fox viewers don’t know what’s going on in the world at a most basic and fundamental level. Every study is cited and linked from this wikipedia page.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fox_News_Channel_controversies_and_allegations_of_bias#Reports.2C_polls_and_studies
Cameron, I agree. Opinion shows can stay opinion shows, but the news should actually be fair and balanced. I am not sure when it became okay to be so obviously biased when only reporting the news.
Cameron, your wiki “proof” is not. The poll you’re apparently using to say Fox viewers are “the most ignorant audience gracing the cable news feeds” disparaged by multiple conservative sources as being “pure propapganda.”
The author of the poll later issued a statement, “The findings were not meant to and cannot be used as a basis for making broad judgments about the general accuracy of the reporting of various networks or the general accuracy of the beliefs of those who get their news from those networks.”
Which you did.
Gosh Jill, you’re pretty much just echoing the critisism of the poll provided there. How about these two then.
Fox News viewers as ignorant:
http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=37368
http://intl-hij.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/10/3/56
You know Jill,
You’re welcome to find a survey that suggests otherwise too. Currently, it appears that the best studies I find indicate Fox viewers are a little misinformed to say the least. If it’s wrong, there must be other studies you’d think done to counter them… that is unless they have something to hide and would rather sweep it under the rug (dismiss as propoganda).
Cam, thanks for your gracious offer for me to find a study proving Fox viewers including myself are not stupid.
When playing games, I prefer to play offense, however.
Playing indeed… offense or defense? I think your playing with yourself.
Viel spass,
The fairness doctrine.
For people like Cam/NPR who can’t make it on their own arguments and ideas, and need the government to help them…
Eh, I don’t watch any news on TV, especially CNN and Fox TV, I prefer to get my news from the newspaper (and there was an excellent abortion debate in the Op-Ed section of the St. Paul Pioneer Press today), though I do watch the Colbert Report and the Daily Show just for kicks. :)
“Eh, I don’t watch any news on TV, especially CNN and Fox TV, though I do watch the Colbert Report and the Daily Show”
what is this world coming to…….
@Jasper: Just because I watch the Daily Show and the Colbert Report doesn’t mean that’s where I get my news and opinions. I watch them for enjoyment because I find them amusing, no other reason. But you can go ahead and think I watch those for real news…
Jasper, you seem to be holding a grudge against these two shows. Are you so threatened by comedy you insult their viewers just looking for a laugh?
Courtesy of Lewis Black:
http://www.comedycentral.com/motherload/player.jhtml?ml_video=89307&ml_collection=&ml_gateway=&ml_gateway_id=&ml_comedian=&ml_runtime=&ml_context=show&ml_origin_url=/shows/the_daily_show/videos/lewis_black/index.jhtml&ml_playlist=&lnk=&is_large=true
Who is going to determine the “rightness” or “leftness” of a program? If the host is pro- border fence, and ALSO pro- gay marriage, what is he, right or left?
Are we going to be saddled with another government agency – the Programming Equivalent Exercise of Political Opinions, Orders and Propaganda (PEE-POOP) Department?
Just what America needs.
Perhaps we could spend all those extra tax dollars that are just laying around to listen to all talk radio and calculate percentage of right and left speech. Fair and Balanced, you know.
Milehimama,
LOL. PEEPOOP best sums up this whole doctrine. No one is forced to listen to anything they choose not to. Hasn’t that always been the favorite liberal mantra? Who was forced to listen to that degenerate Howard Stern, right? Who was forced to look at pornography? We must be tolerant, there must be free speech. Great. That is until liberals are the ones whose oxes are being gored. When its their TV stations and newspapers that are losing viewers and readers, when its their radio program that flops, well that must be because of lack of balance and fairness! Time for the government to step in.
Leave it all to the free market. Air America flopped. Live with it. There’s a reason why and it has nothing to do with fairness. Put on a better show and maybe Americans will listen. People listen to conservative radio because they WANT to. Conservative radio would fold tomorrow if people weren’t willing to listen to it. I personally like a choice of what I will listen to and watch and to draw my own conclusions from various sources, as I’m sure everyone else on this site would choose to do as well. Did anyone ever question the fairness or accuracy of ABC, NBC, or CBS?
Rather than a fairness doctrine, perhaps liberals should be taking the hint that their message just isn’t being well received and maybe, just maybe, that’s why their news shows and attempts at talk radio are going down the tubes.
Milehi and Mary, LOL! How true!