knockedup4.jpgGreat title for a surprisingly great post by Lisa Wade on Huffington Post yesterday.
Writing about the movie Knocked Up, Wade’s intent was certainly not to further the pro-life cause but rather to browbeat pro-aborts.
But she did both, starting with that excellent question in her title….

In Knocked Up, a one-night stand and an unplanned pregnancy are the fodder for an astoundingly, catastrophically tragic comedy. What’s so funny?
An innocent child is forced into an experiment to see if a pot-bellied, pot-smoking, porn-peddler can get his sh** together and become a responsible adult….

That this moron is called upon to raise a child is the comedic premise of the movie….
Our objection is this: Knocked Up is not just a silly movie, it’s pro-life ideology disguised by [penis] jokes.
Knocked Up and pro-life activists share the idea that it is always better to raise a child than have an abortion. We learn this from the movie because they (1) associate a pro-abortion stance with unlikable characters (such as the pregnant woman’s mother) and (2) romanticize a man’s choice to be a father after going (way) out of their way to demonstrate that he is a terrible candidate for fatherhood. It is a sign of how powerfully the religious right owns the notion of morality that we accept that this man can be redeemed…. Like pro-life logic, this movie relies on the idea that keeping a child is always the best thing to do. That is, after all, why we’re supposed to be heart-warmed by this gross-out movie in the end.

knocked%20up2.jpg

Is deciding to keep the baby an inherently moral decision? Or might using an innocent child in an attempt to redeem an inveterate slacker be more immoral than not having it at all? Despite our cultural fetishization of biological parenthood, there is no alchemy that turns slacker lead into parenting gold…. Sometimes people shouldn’t be parents. (And at no point does anyone suggest adoption, even though there are waiting lists for adoptive couples who actually want a baby.)
The point is not that abortion (or adoption) would have made for better comedy. (Although, if one wanted to make a gross-out comedy, why not make it about abortion?) The point is the insidious pro-life message of the film: Even dope-smoking, misogynist morons (the antithesis of the pro-life contingent) “know” that abortion is wrong. Where does that place those of us who support abortion rights? Or choose to have one? Or (gasp) think that abortion, in some cases, might be good? It is almost unthinkable to identify as pro-abortion. Even adamant pro-choice activists frequently say that abortion is an unfortunate and regrettable necessity. The religious right wins when keeping a baby is always seen as morally superior to having an abortion.
The popularity of the film reveals some of our culture’s most unfortunate tendencies: we fetishize biological parenthood, ascribe to the mythology that love conquers all, and have abdicated the realm of moral judgment to the religious right.

knocked%20up3.bmpBut can’t love sometimes conquer all? Can an unplanned pregnancy straighten a jerk out? Have pro-aborts “abdicated the realm of moral judgment to the religious right”?
One point of correction: Wade maintains pro-lifers feign adoption, which is absolutely false. Remember this movie was made by romantic liberals, and it is actually they who “fetishize” biological child-rearing. Pro-lifers believe strong, stable, two-parent families are usually best, whether biological or adoptive, given the “choice.”
P.S. The pro-life message of Knocked Up isn’t “insidious.” It’s quite apparent.
P.P.S: I am so tired of the word misogynist.
My two previous posts on Knocked Up:
June 7: “Nice girls don’t”
July 18: “Is Hollywood censoring abortion?”

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...