Pro-life video of the day: In wake of Colorado massacre Obama says to hug children tighter, but what about those massacred by abortion?
by LauraLoo
Are you feeling the same way I am, after emotionally suffering with those impacted by the Aurora, Colorado, shooting massacre having to listen to President Obama tell parents to hug their children tighter, along with making other tragically ironic statements, such as:
Even as we learn how this happened, and who’s responsible, we may never understand what leads anybody to terrorize their fellow human beings like this. Such violence, such evil, is senseless. It’s beyond reason. But while we will never know fully what causes somebody to take the life of another, we do know what makes life worth living….
And if there’s anything to take away from this tragedy, it’s the reminder that life is very fragile. Our time here is limited, and it is precious. And what matters at the end of the day is not the small things… ultimately it’s how we choose to treat one another and how we love one another….
At the end of the day what we’ll remember will be those we loved and what we did for others. That’s why we’re here.
Specifically focus on the video from 2:52 on…
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfUSWDSYnlU[/youtube]
President Obama, since you have asked us to take time for prayer and reflection, why don’t you do the same as it pertains to the thousands of preborn children you sanction daily to die via your pro-abortion/infanticide stance? Innocent children that are mowed down daily. Where are the hugs afforded to them outside the womb? There are none because they don’t survive.
President Obama also mentions his daughters, Malia and Sasha, could very well have been at that movie theater, at a dreadful time such as this. Well, not quite, Mr. President. They would have had ample Secret Service protecting them at taxpayer expense. They would surely make it in and out of every venue they attend safely, since the Secret Service are required to “take a bullet” for your family.
While I don’t question President Obama’s concern for the victims of the Aurora shooting, nevertheless I’m sick of this two-faced President who just doesn’t get it. (Can I get an Amen?)
Email dailyvid@jillstanek.com with your video suggestions.
Jill Stanek is a nurse turned speaker, columnist and blogger, a national figure in the effort to protect both preborn and postborn innocent human life.
AMEN!!!
A double AMEN!! AMEN!!
Amen, Laura! But he’ll never get it because to him, and all abortion supporters, the unborn are not human; they’re not people.
Isn’t this board under the same judgment of this post though? I haven’t seen any posts about starving kids in africa – so you have all this concern on this board for aborted babies, but care nothing about anybody else in society?
Well said, Jill.
In his first remarks on the tragedy Friday morning, Obama seems to have used the occasion to his political advantage, stating that those who died “had hopes for the future and they had dreams that were not yet fulfilled.”
Ex- are you proud of the pres’ record on abortion? Why are you always defending him or changing the subject?
Your comments are getting more and more intellectually desperate…
Mary Ann
A fair criticism would have been that his policies on abortion have stunk. I would have agreed with that.
What I don’t agree with is what this post is suggesting, which is, if you are speaking about some tragedy and forget any other tragedy, that you are being a horrible person. Again, I’ve seen no concern on this board for all sorts of other oppressed people – so the line that asks for an “amen” is also pointing a finger back at this board.
Okay X-GOP, but we haven’t fought for legislation to kill kids in Africa. Obama has fought for legislation to kill the unborn.
And btw, I am raising money for my sister who is trying to adopt one of those “starving kids in Africa”. So no, we’re not two-faced or hypocritical.
Sydney
I’m not saying you or anyone is two faced.
I’m saying that the post essentially makes the argument that Obama should have mentioned aborted babies in his speech. I would argue that concentrating on an area that needs help doesn’t open one up to criticism that they were ignoring another area.
Obama is wide open for abortion criticism in general. I just think the way this was argued was logically sloppy.
You antiabortion zealots are vile. To denigrate the dead in Colorado for your insanity is along the lines of Fred Phelps and his ilk.
Most of you are just as deranged as is James Holmes. The difference is he acted on his derangement.
And for those of you who had abortions and now oppose abortion, isn’t it about time you quit exploiting your abortions?
Amazing that if you think the deaths in Colorado and abortion are no different that you do not also see the hypocrisy of belonging to the Catholic Church with its vile molestations.
At Penn State, molesters and those who covered them up get fired and convicted.
In the Catholic Church, molesters get reassigned and another chance to diddle a new set of kids.
Well, EX, I have to say that this post isn’t about how Obama should have mentioned abortion. I believe what is being conveyed is a pro-lifer’s thoughts at hearing these words that Obama spoke (poignant words no doubt penned by a gifted speech-writer, not the man himself, I might add).
And anyway, if you listen to what Obama is talking about – senseless killing – it actually has a lot more to do with abortion than with, as you say, starving kids in Africa. Abortion is also the senseless killing of children and babies – usually for reasons that have not been well thought-out; abortion is often an emotional knee-jerk reaction to a tense situation. No one is saying that abortion should have been mentioned. But, knowing how the President really feels about unborn and recently born citizens, the words about “senseless killing” coming from his mouth feels like pearls in a swine’s mouth.
Most of us here and not duplicitous and do care about other social ills, some of which we discuss here. But it’s a blog about abortion, so obviously we’re going to keep returning to that point.
(Jason)Not all of us here are Catholic, so you can crawl back under your bridge now, little troll.
Hey Jason,
You mad, bro?
Very well said, LibertyBelle….THANK YOU.
Praxedes, yes, about the denigration of the Colorado victims by the hypocrites here.
Pamela, the fact is many here are and they give the rapists a pass.
Pamela, no problem. :)
I’ll answer legitimate commenters (Ex-GOP) but not angry little trolls. *cough*Jason*Cough*
PS I’m quite amused that today’s troll is screaming about denigration of the victims of Colorado by talking about abortion….. by talking about child molestation. Seriously.
I mean, maybe he’s not a troll, but someone trying to put on a sick comedy act?
Ex-GOP says: I’m saying that the post essentially makes the argument that Obama should have mentioned aborted babies in his speech.
Um, no. You seriously missed the point of this post.
Tragically ironic statements:
Such violence, such evil, is senseless. It’s beyond reason.
reminder that life is very fragile.
Our time here is limited, and it is precious.
And what matters at the end of the day is not the small things… ultimately it’s how we choose to treat one another and how we love one another….
It’s hard to wrap my head around the fact that the man that said the above ALSO supports the “right” of women to kill their unborn children and doesn’t believe that children born alive after an abortion attempt deserve medical care. Ugh.
Jason,
I’m not religious at all, I oppose legal abortion, and I fail to see how comparing one set of innocent victims of killers to another set of innocent victims of killers is “denigration”. Please explain it to me.
This post was on the President’s speech and how his words compare to his position on abortion. Jason, you are the one turning the actual event into a political football itself to attempt to shame prolifers. Elected officials words and actions are worthy of scrutiny, and attempting to reject such scrutiny with emotional anger by implying the other people who frequent this blog are “deranged” as someone who would shoot 70 people is shameful itself.
Isn’t this board under the same judgment of this post though? I haven’t seen any posts about starving kids in africa – so you have all this concern on this board for aborted babies, but care nothing about anybody else in society?
False comparison, by a lot. To make it not be apples and oranges, we would have to be deliberately causing the kids in Africa to starve, one way or another. Obama not only doesn’t care about aborted children, he actively encourages their deaths, all the while running around thinking he cares about life. I may not make a whole lotta posts about starving kids, but I certainly don’t do anything to take food from them.
I have to agree with everyone who has called your comments off-point and a smoke-screen. Nor is your characterization of the original post fair. Pointing out that someone who claims to care about others is spending time propping up a system that kills a lot of people is a perfectly fair criticism, and not remotely confusing. You are being deliberately obtuse here.
As far as Jason goes…
And for those of you who had abortions and now oppose abortion, isn’t it about time you quit exploiting your abortions?
Why don’t you explain, in very small words, exactly how someone who has experience with a thing and chooses to share that with others is “exploiting” their experience? Because, last I checked, the people who have actually done a thing are some of the most expert folks around to say whether that thing is good or bad. First-hand experience is hard to beat, and you’re going to have to be awfully clever to come up with a way for someone to “exploit” themself.
But those that have had abortions and are proabortion aren’t exploiting their abortions??
Is that it Jason??
Jason, unlike Obama’s advocacy for killing unborn children, the Catholic Church does not advocate child rape. In the past, lesser forms of this abuse were often characterized as moral failings which required an internal solution rather than an external criminal prosecution. This was obviously a huge mistake. Priests who committed any criminal offense should have been dealt with by the government justice system. I don’t know of any Catholic who excuses this reprehensible behavior. In fact Pope Benedict XVI went so far as to refer to priests who abuse their leadership role to prey on children as “filth”. This was and is a very painful and disastrous scandal for Catholics. The Church has greatly changed the way it functions because of it in order to prevent this from happening again.
Liberty – that’s fair.
I just think, we all know Obama’s abortion stance – so why make a point on a posting on a terrible event that somebody can’t be sincere about something because they aren’t in the right about.
I mean, let’s just get to the bottom line. A good chunk of Americans believe that after conception, and before birth – that at some point that the fetus really isn’t a human being or a baby – so it is permissible to kill it. I don’t agree with them. But that’s the bottom line. And Obama is part of that group. So he believes that it isn’t a horrible thing when abortions take place (I know I’m taking great liberties here and leaving holes all over the place…just trying to make a quick point).
But just because he doesn’t think the way I do or you do doesn’t mean he can’t be sincere in his grieving for the victims in Colorado.
Quite frankly, there are people in this world that don’t believe I care enough about life because I eat meat – go read PETAs board – in their belief, a person must abstain from eating animals to truly honor life.
I don’t know where I’m going anymore on this except to say – just because somebody is wrong in an area in life doesn’t mean that they aren’t sincere in other areas.
Hey Ex, you raised a fair point yourself. :)
I agree that just because someone is bad in one area doesn’t mean that they can’t sincerely grieve in another. Just like I believe that some abortionists probably genuinely love their own children, Obama probably is at least saddened by the shootings in CO – I believe anyone with a heart is. It’s a horrifying tragedy in our nation, and our prayers and hearts go out to the families of the victims.
However, even while recognizing that Obama’s sadness may be sincere, the words he chose still sound jarring to me, as a pro-lifer. So I’m not even saying he doesn’t genuinely grieve the loss of life recently – I’m saying the words he chose are a little ironic, and it saddens me even more that he can be saddened for loss of born life, yet cavalierly promote policies that take unborn life. That’s all. :)
You just couldn’t help yourself, could you? You simply couldn’t resist the opportunity to take a cheap shot at the President, even at the expense of victims of a massacre that occurred not even four whole days ago. I guess I shouldn’t be surprised. People who happily invoke the Holocaust as a talking point aren’t going to have any scruples about doing the same thing with a comparatively minor tragedy.
I believe Obama is sincere in his remarks about the Colorado massacre.
I also think it sucks that he doesn’t view killing in the womb to be “senseless evil violence”. And that he doesn’t recognize the “fragile” lives of the unborn as “precious”.
He doesn’t agree with them, but comes here and constantly posts exactly as a pro-choicer posts. Exactly. Right down to the ‘what about the starving children?!’
Yeah, well, WE don’t think the way to relieve the suffering of children is to kill off their younger siblings.
He is a pro-choicer that occaisionally puts in a fake sentence about being pro-life, for what? To pretend he’s “one of us”? Along with Hal, he fulfills what he believes is his sacred duty: making sure pro-lifers don’t experience a vast echo chamber of agreement. Because that would what, affect his ability to function?
Don’t like a “vast echo chamber”?? Then guess what, the entire REMAINDER of the internet is available for your perusal. Avoiding us and our pesky “echo chamber” is only a click away, trolls. Only a click away.
Dear Ex-GOP ~ Laura Loo clarifies her point with: “While I don’t question President Obama’s concern for the victims of the Aurora shooting, nevertheless I’m sick of this two-faced President who just doesn’t get it. (Can I get an Amen?)”
LifeJoy – I just feel the second part negates the first.
I think LifeJoy is a great person, but he/she beats his/her children and drinks too much.
See what I’m saying?
Your example is a contradiction.
LL’s statement is not.
The President cares for the victims, but what he says about violence and the potential of humans could easily be applied to the unborn, buf he doesn’t see that. You don’t have to agree necessarily. But this inconsistency is not a wild stretch of the imagination.
Once again I must apologize for my troll feeding tendencies. But joan, we do not “happily” invoke the Holocaust. I can assure you that this is done solemnly, only after a great deal of thought.
But joan, we do not “happily” invoke the Holocaust. I can assure you that this is done solemnly, only after a great deal of thought.
And that is why the mainstream American Jewish community is appalled by the comparison of abortion to the Shoah. The mainstream American Jewish community is not part of the “pro-life” movement for a number of reasons one of which is the above cited comment. But then the pro-life movement, as a majority Christian/ Catholic movement could care less about what the Jewish community (Christ killers now “baby killers”) thinks.
Google Abraham Foxman – ADL – for some insight into the Jewish attitude about the equivalency of the Shoah to abortion.
As a Polish Catholic, considering that 3 million of us were murdered by Hitler along with our Jewish brothers and sisters, I would say that abortion is worse than what Hitler did. The numbers of people put to death by abortion are far greater, and the world ignores the humanitarian disaster in a much more profound way as abortion isn’t across the sea in some foreign land – it is among us daily.
“Jewish brothers and sisters, I would say that abortion is worse than what Hitler did.”
The Jews do not accept you as their “brothers and sisters.” The Polish Catholics who were murdered, by the Nazis, were not targeted because of their ethnicity. They were not part of a “master plan” to rid the world of Polish people but were, rather, targeted because they resisted the Nazis. The inconvenient truth is that many Polish people had no problem with the eradication of the Jews whose religion stood as a dramatic counterpoint to that of the Roman pontiff who had no problem with the eradication of the “Christ killing” Jews.
But if you think that the Jews are your brothers and sisters regarding the equivalency of the abortion to the Shoah, just google ADL, Abraham Foxman (a holocaust survivor), and abortion.
They are not part of your movement for so many reasons chief among them being abortion. American Jews (Christ killers now baby killers) are, for the most part, pro-choice (many of them of BOD’s of Planned Parenthood) – and that’s why you loathe them, truth be told. But the truth is that they’re not all that fond of you, either.
And for you to say that abortion is the same as the gassing, torture, and attempted annihilation of a post-born group of people just underscores why they will never accept your Christian/Catholic cult. It’s quite offensive but you don’t care, do you.
So now the “pro-life” movement is saying that abortion is worse than the Colorado massacre. But then, that’s what they say when an abortion doctor is assassinated. Is there any question as to why the “pro-life” movement is viewed, by many, as no better than the Taliban? Is there any question as to why the FBI is monitoring the activities of a movement that is, at heart, a terrorist movement on American soil?
“The Jews do not accept you as their “brothers and sisters.””
I know, but I love them anyway.
“The Polish Catholics who were murdered, by the Nazis, were not targeted because of their ethnicity. They were not part of a “master plan” to rid the world of Polish people”
“All Polish people will disappear from the world….It is essential that the great German people should consider it as its major task to destroy all Poles.” -Heinrich Himmler, Commander of the Nazi Replacement Army, Head of Hitler’s personal bodyguards
I’ve been a regular visitor to Jill’s site for a couple years now. I also regularly visit lots of other pro-life websites. What I find missing from ANY of them is any kind of criticism FROM JEWISH PEOPLE of any kind: liberal, orthodox, conservative, purple, spotted, short, etc.
So, if our comparison of the millions of children dead via abortion to the millions of post-born people dead via the Holocaust is so very offensive…
If it’s so very offensive….
so very offensive…
Why are Joan and cc (neither Jewish) the only ones to come here (or anywhere) and give us a hard time about it?!
As the ole lady said in the 80’s, “Where’s the beef?”
@ninek: It ain’t a party until CC brings the cultural appropriation. ;)
Domestic terrorist Theodore Shulman, better known as Operation Counterstrike or (in these parts) SOMG, was a pro-abortion internet troll before he was arrested with cyanide in his possession.
Just sayin’.
“The Polish Catholics who were murdered, by the Nazis, were not targeted because of their ethnicity. They were not part of a “master plan” to rid the world of Polish people”
This is so absolutely, completely false that it is embarrassing. When Poland was invaded, the Polish language was forbidden, mass amounts of books were burned, and Polish art and culture were obliterated. The Nazis pumped out tons of propaganda claiming that Poles were subhumans.
“Accordingly I have placed my Totenkopf Units in readiness — for the present only in the East — with orders to them to send to death, mercilessly and without compassion, men, women, and children of Polish race and language.”- Hitler
“[Poles are] more animals than human beings.” —Goebbels
Luana, I agree with your comment.
CC reminds me of Ex-RINO in that they both spew patently false drivel without conscience.
There ya go, CC! Now we’ve found another ethnic group that was persecuted by Nazis that you can pretend to be, or want to be, or whatever it is you do with them (impersonate? It wouldn’t surprise me with the way you are CONSTANTLY talking about Jews. You’re obviously obsessed with them).
oh, wait, they’re not Pro-Abortion as a majority, AND a lot of them are icky-poo Catholics (GROSS!), so you probably aren’t interested since it doesn’t fit your narrative. :(
CC,
In response to your assertion, “The mainstream American Jewish community is not part of the “pro-life” movement for a number of reasons…”
In the United States, Orthodox Jews are usually affiliated with the National Pro-Life Religious Council….
Jewish Pro-Life Foundation
As a person whose family originally comes from an area now in Polish territory I am unbelievably offended by your lack of cultural empathy… Actually CC, I’m not offended really, clearly you have a misunderstanding of history so I don’t need to bring out my false righteous indignation. But also clear is that those who live in glass houses should opt for Nerf balls instead of rocks.
From a Holocaust survivor site:
“…Poland was a very anti-Semitic society in the years just before and after WWII.
During the War Jews were appalled by the lack of aid they received from their neighbors and what they took to be avariciousness as some Poles usurped Jewish property now suddenly become available. The small number of Poles who preyed on Jews by turning them in for rewards made every Pole a risk to Jewish confidence. Jewish partisans were attacked and killed by Polish right wing nationalist groups who instead of making common cause against the Germans regarded the Jews as their enemies also.
It is hard to know how many Poles had sympathy for their Jewish neighbors but were paralyzed into inaction by fear. Yet incidents described above were frequent enough that it was a common Jewish perception of Polish attitudes that they were either indifferent to Jewish suffering or positively glad that the Jews were being removed…”
Hmmm. How random.
I wonder if CC thinks that quote supports her assertion that the Polish “were not targeted because of their ethnicity”.
@CC: Ah, so because there are claims that some Polish persons were bad people, all Polish people are bad and their erasure as Nazi victims is justified on your part. Cool. Thanks for explaining that!
Praxedes:Hey Jason, You mad, bro?
Jason: yes, about the denigration of the Colorado victims by the hypocrites here.
[Jason, you want to be careful about using ‘denigration‘ anywhere close to a discussion about ‘the obamateur’. Next thing you know the Secret Service will be showing up on your doorstep wanting to talk you about thought crimes, racism and threatening the life of your ‘god.’ But let’s hope they have a better grasp of the English language than you do.
denigrate: 1: to attack the reputation of :<denigrate one’s opponents> 2: to deny the importance or validity of
If you had accused us of ‘denigrating’ the obamateur, then you would have been closer to the mark. But ridiculing the ridiculous in no way detracks from the deaths of the innocent victims of a left wing loon.
joan of arcania: You simply couldn’t resist the opportunity to take a cheap shot at the President, even at the expense of victims of a massacre that occurred not even four whole days ago.
[I reject your flawed premise. b o has record that stands in stark contrast to what his ‘grammophone’ mind regurgitates from a teleprompter. Pointing out his duplicity in no way detracts or defames the deaths of people that the obamateur is attempting to exploit for his own political gain. His time would have been better used comforting the family of murdered U.S. Border Patrol Brian Terry. ]
Ca-Coffin-ous: “And that is why the mainstream [liberal] American Jewish community is appalled by the comparison obortion to the Shoah.”
[Question: Why are some “American Jews not appalled by the deaths of hundreds of millions of pre-natal children?
Answer: Because in their short sighted and biggoted minds they have done what the Nazi’s did. In an attempt to justify the slaughter, they have de-humanized themselves.]
“Additionally, scholars disagree as to what proportion of the 1.8-1.9 million non-Jewish Polish civilian deaths during the Nazi conquest and occupation of Poland were part of the Holocaust, though there is no doubt of the eventual genocidal intentions of the Nazis towards the Poles. At least 140,000 Poles were sent to Auschwitz, and the Polish intelligentsia were the first targets of the Einsatzgruppen death squads.”
http://www.martinfrost.ws/htmlfiles/holocaust.html
While the Germans did have “genocidal intentions” towards Slavs, there was no defined policy such as the “final solution” which was articulated at Wanassee.
The official spokesgroup for the Jewish people doesn’t share your moral equivalency between abortion and the Shoah.
ADL Derides Film’s ‘Cynical, Perverse’ Attempt to Compare the Holocaust to Abortion in America
New York, NY, November 9, 2011 … The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) today derided as “cynical and perverse” a movie that unequivocally compares the murder of millions of Jews and others in the Holocaust to women having abortions in the United States, calling the film “one of the most offensive and outrageous abuses of the memory of the Holocaust we have seen in years.
[Question: Why are some “American Jews not appalled by the deaths of hundreds of millions of pre-natal children?
Answer: Because in their short sighted and biggoted minds they have done what the Nazi’s did. In an attempt to justify the slaughter, they have de-humanized themselves.
Thank, you, thank you for underscoring what is perceived to be the anti-Semitic underpinning of the “pro-life” movement which is just an extension of the almost 2,000 year old meme of the Jews as “Christ killers” – a meme that justified almost 2,000 years of persecution at the hands of the Catholic Church. Now, the Jews are seen as “baby killers,” too.
Thanks again for a great screen grab that will be sent out via social media. Be proud of your bigotry, Ken. I hope that if you repair air conditioners, in the homes of pro-choice Jews, you can keep your hatred to yourself.
CC says: “though there is no doubt of the eventual genocidal intentions of the Nazis towards the Poles.”
Why didn’t you just come out and say “I was wrong”? Clearly, the Polish were “targeted because of their ethnicity”.
Like I said, the only one coming on this site to complain is cc. Bottom line is this: Margaret Sanger and Adolf Hitler belonged to their own little mutual admiration society. They were connected, associated, and history speaks for itself. The huge statistics of how many LIVING human children are slaughtered before their time today is DIRECTLY and HISTORICALLY linked to the perpetrators of the Jewish Holocaust. If some Jewish people don’t like it, I can’t help that. It’s the truth.
The reason that we don’t see more complaints HERE is that many people see it the way it is. cc can try and post frequently, but the frequency of one person’s comments is still only that. Where’s the beef, cc? Where’s the beef HERE on pro-life sites? Only you and you’re just a wannabe goya.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ug75diEyiA0
CC is an anti-Polish bigot.
I don’t know how to spell it in English, but if my ‘gee-ah-gee’ were alive today, he’d say cc is talking out her ‘dupa.’
*whispers to self, jiajee? giagee? jahjee?*
Also, STILL waiting on that explanation from Jason. I’ve already read the Lord of the Rings trilogy, so I guess I’ll start on The Hobbit while I wait. (yes, I know I’m doing it backwards)
The reason that we don’t see more complaints HERE is that many people see it the way it is.
Next, you’ll say the reason the Jewish community doesn’t pile into Jill Stanek’s site and denounce Jasper’s hate-filled “filthy Jew” rhetoric is because they have no problem with it. After all, as another commenter noted, Jasper is a “superlative” person who reminds him of St. Peter. Well, excuse me while I puke.
You’ll also say the reason the Black community has no problems with Bro Ken’s racist “Bo-Jangles Obama” comments is because they don’t have a problem with it.
You people are full of your own self-righteousness. You ask why they don’t complain HERE? To be accused of being TROLLS because they DARE to challenge YOU? This site’s traffic and click-throughs won’t even come close to paying your rent. The only people who come here, other than to lurk and research, are those holy few who need to re-affirm themselves by way of an echo chamber.
mp, I can’t help but notice that you don’t dispute the historical and factual link between the two holocausts. Keep it up, though, because if people keep complaining about the comparison, the comparison will continue. And, it will continue to educate people about the reality of “population control” and negative eugenics and more.
I personally call it The QBSeven Effect. Go ahead, pro-choicers, make a real big stink about it: the truth will come out and the comparison will stand.
Xalisae, I’m so glad to hear you’re reading The Hobbit! Maybe if pro-choicers ate a second breakfast now and then, they wouldn’t be so crabby.
mp, I can’t help but notice that you don’t dispute the historical and factual link between the two holocausts.
There you go again. You imply that someone agrees with you simply because they don’t object.
You need help. The connection you’re attempting to make is totally delusional and in your mind only.
I notice that you STILL don’t dispute the direct factual and historical link between Margaret Sanger and the Final Solution. Did I imply something? I didn’t imply, in fact I stated the obvious: I notice you didn’t dispute the truth, because you can’t. It’s not a matter of opinion. Either there was a connection between the two or there was not. Since Sanger was one of the architechts of the Final Solution, it’s not a matter for debate. You can deny it, but you can also deny that water is wet.
Prove me wrong. Prove that nobody in Hilter’s Reich had any connection to Sanger whatsoever. Prove the documents are fake. Prove Sanger didn’t..oh, Maggie left PLENTY of evidence, quite the long paper trail in fact.
Look how angry it makes you and cc. Why? cc doesn’t mind negative eugenics, and she believes in EVERYTHING Sanger worked for. Why deny it? Because it makes people uncomfortable? Well, it should. The wholesale murder of innocents should at the very least make you uncomfortable.
I want abortion to be illegal again to save precious human lives. It’s only a little side bonus that I get to annoy cc and mp while I’m working toward that goal.
Hmm my comment disappeared. I think both Holocaust comparisons and this post are in extremely poor taste
CliChéd says: July 24, 2012 at 11:55 am “Thanks again for a great screen grab that will be sent out via social media.”
Well you know what the PR gurus say: There is no such thing as bad publicity.
Please be sure and spell my name correctly and note that I am wee bit Jewish and whole lot Cherokee and according to some geneologists that make me even more Jewish.
Only the ‘hit dogs will howl’.
The rest of my kinsmen will agree wholeheartedly with my assessment of the myopia of ‘pro-abort’ Jews.
You go ahead and be indignant for them. There might be a paying gig in it for you. I read somewhere that Jews used to employ professional mourners.
With all your whining and hand wringing you are a perfect fit for the job.
That a sad commentary when you have to pay someone to grieve your passing.
Jesus said, “Let the dead bury the dead.”
HE did not seem to be overly concerned with bruising their fragile egos.
Are a ‘tookus’ and a ‘dupa’ one and the same?
mp says: July 24, 2012 at 4:55 pm “You’ll also say the reason the Black community has no problems with Bro Ken’s racist “Bo-Jangles Obama” comments is because they don’t have a problem with it.”
Please break it down for me and for all the other folks who might be looking on.
How is ‘bo-jangles’ a racist term?
Is the name inherently ‘racist’?
Bill ‘bojangles’ Robinson certainly didn’t think it was ‘racist’. It was his trademark.
If anything I owe Robinson an apology for associating the 0’bamateur with him.
Reading from a teleprompter and dancing are the only two things in which la 0’bamba has demonstrated an iota of competency.
[Well there was that Marine ‘corpse’ fumble and the thing about the Polish death camps and the 57 states and introducing himself by mistake…]
[But as my black as the ace of spades friend from Jamaica, Hart says, “You could say de same ting about a pimp.” or as ‘black’ pastor James David Manning tags b o: ‘long legged mac daddy’ ( which I understand is another name for ‘pimp’.]
But I digress.
Let me redact and amend: The only area in which b o has demonstrated consistent competence is ‘dancing’. Nothing racist about that. Not everyone is blessed with a sense of rhythm.
We’re providing the man and his wife and kids with three hots and a cot. The least he could do is entertain us.
b o is a grown man. he should be able to fend for himself. No need for you to conceal him behind your skirts.
I would not find him any less repugnant in any other color, shape, size, gender, religion, nationality etc.
mr. bo-jangles is a jerk and he would be a jerk no matter who is momma and daddy are.
Get over your infatuation with your first black president and recognize him for the four star failure that he is. [clue: it doesn’t have anything to do with pigmentation.]
The 0’bumbler is 3 1/2 years into his term of office and he just ain’t cuttin it. He is a joke, a laughing stock. Only his devotees and servile psychophants still take him seriously.
The only thing that has kept him from establishing bench marks in the ‘misery index’ is an artificially low inflation rate, but that hen is coming home to roost and she is going to lay one large rotten egg that only a dead man could miss.
But you 0’bamaphiles will deliberately mistake it for the aroma of one of b o’s flatulent offerrings and faint in delirious orgasmic ecstacy.
But don’t worry b o will send for a ‘paralegal’ to tend to you.
Yep, ken, one and the same! Don’t know how to spell either one in English.
Yes, Jack the comparisons are not fun. In an ideal world, nobody would be getting killed by other humans. Even though we don’t live in an ideal world, I’d like us to create a better one. Priority #1: stop killing innocent people of any size, born, unborn, planned, or purple.
KtB, LOL. LL ;)
But you 0?bamaphiles will deliberately mistake it for the aroma of one of b o’s flatulent offerrings and faint in delirious orgasmic ecstacy.
Spittle and pornographic drivel. You’ve exceeded yourself.
missy progressive says: July 25, 2012 at 3:17 pm “Spittle and pornographic drivel. You’ve exceeded yourself.”
Wow!/?!? For lilberals who pride yourself in how progressive you are, you sure are a prudish lot when it comes to sex.
For the record, I never mentioned spittle or drivel.
That is your concoction.
How do you get from spittle and drivel to pornography?
So now you are accusing me of being kinky.
And you failed to assail me with the racism charge.
Does this mean I am gaining ground with you?
How do you get from spittle and drivel to pornography?
The nominal subject of this thread is the Aurora, Colorado massacre and how President Obama allegedly appropriated the tragedy to advance his political agenda.
The comment you made uses lurid and sensational language to make a point about what stimulates “O’bamaphiles” sexually. In this context, specifically the Aurora massacre, the remark is pornographic.
It was … predictable.
“The only people who come here, other than to lurk and research, are those holy few who need to re-affirm themselves by way of an echo chamber”
says the troll, who along with our other regular trolls, are attempting to create their own stale rhetoric echo chamber on a pro-life site. LOL! So brave, would you like a medal or a chest to pin it on?
Today we commemorate the massacre of perhaps hundreds of unborn babies by Little Boy sixty-seven years ago.