Poll and party
Poll
The Naperville Sun is currently running this poll question (right column): “Do you think a Planned Parenthood facility should go into operation on the Naperville-Aurora border?” The poll is running 60-39% in our favor. Go vote!
UPDATE, 9/24, 7:50a: The poll is still open, and it is running 62-37% in our favor, with 5,225 votes cast so far.
[HT: moderators MK and jasper]
Party
Jeff from ChicagoProLifeActivist reported on the celebration held last night for pray-ers and activists involved in the effort to stop Planned Parenthood Aurora….
Hundreds filled the Wheatland Community Park in Aurora to give thanks and praise to God and to the volunteers of the Fox Valley Families Against Planned Parenthood. The mood was upbeat and optimistic, with constant talk of that morning’s federal court decision that keeps the nearby Planned Parenthood abortion clinic closed for now.
But an equally constant message was circulating – that the struggle against Planned Parenthood is still underway, and numerous battles await local pro-lifers in the days, weeks, and months following this temporary victory….
David Bereit, founder of the “40 Days for Life” campaign… gave a rousing talk, informing the crowd that the entire nation has been following and is inspired by our fight against Planned Parenthood. David stated that our victories in Aurora could serve as a “tipping point” in the nation-wide struggle against Planned Parenthood, and called on everyone to pray and fight even harder to rid Aurora of Planned Parenthood and defend life.
Jeff made a little photo montage of the evening:
Jill Stanek is a nurse turned speaker, columnist and blogger, a national figure in the effort to protect both preborn and postborn innocent human life.
“The poll is running 60-39% in our favor. Go vote!”
The only reason the pro-aborts get 39% is that they believe it is perfectly fine to vote more than once. It would probably be more like 93% to 7% in our favor, if pro-aborts had any scruples at all.
My apologies if this is impolite, but I want to let PIP know if she is reading this that I put one last comment for her down below at the bottom of the long thread on nutrition and hydration.
Keep on standing up for life! God bless.
you can only vote once as far as I can tell. I tried more than once and the # stayed the same
Hey Jeff,
How come you only took pictures of the normal people? Where are all the right wing lunatic religious fanatics?
Joe, I voted “no” 2500 times.
Doug
Yeah, from those pictures, one might get the idea that anti-abortion “religious fanatics” are really just normal people. And that would be bad. Heck, it might even lead to revealing the truth about the annual March for Life – that it’s the biggest collection of peaceful, normal people you will ever find.
“you can only vote once as far as I can tell. I tried more than once and the # stayed the same”
There are ways to vote more than once. It requires a little effort, but someone could do it if they wanted to.
And Doug, “Joe, I voted “no” 2500 times.”
Of course, I don’t believe you. I do seriously wonder if your valuations and opinions would keep you from voting more than once, per se?
Joe: I don’t believe you.
You’re right – I was totally kidding.
……
I do seriously wonder if your valuations and opinions would keep you from voting more than once, per se?
No, but here at home I have a dial-up connection, and not a “fast” one, at that. Voting 2500 times would probably take a week….
Doug
Doug,
I think it is sad that Democrats think “democracy” means the person who can vote more times than their opposition wins. I think Democrats should change their party name to something else. I would suggest “dishonestcrats
The only reason the pro-aborts get 39% is that they believe it is perfectly fine to vote more than once. It would probably be more like 93% to 7% in our favor, if pro-aborts had any scruples at all.
For the love of everything holy, Joe. Here’s a bit of advice: grow up and move on from the second grade.
I think it is sad that Democrats think “democracy” means the person who can vote more times than their opposition wins. I think Democrats should change their party name to something else. I would suggest “dishonestcrats