Abortion proponents profile pro-life leaders and activists

Well it didn’t take long for my new son-in-law to stir up trouble in the U.S. I couldn’t be prouder.

He would be Kiwi Andy Moore, who launched AbortionWiki.org a couple months ago, about the same time Operation Rescue’s Troy Newman launched AbortionDocs.org.

And look at the hornets they have stirred. Pro-life friend Leslie forwarded me this email she received a couple days ago. Click to enlarge…
 

 So now pro-lifers will know if they’re worth their salt. Should they make Voice of Choice, they have arrived.

Speaking of profiling, Todd Stave is the co-owner, along with his sister Nancy, of Germantown Reproductive Health Services in Maryland, one of the mills where infamous late-term abortionist LeRoy Carhart kills babies.

The siblings inherited the business in 2000 from their father, abortionist Carl Edward Stave. Lovely family dynasty. Read more here, on the profile page pro-lifers created about Stave.

At any rate, abortion proponents can no longer accuse pro-lifers of covertly promoting violence against abortionists by posting their personal information. Surely abortion proponents don’t have that in mind by this venture, because surely they condemn violence.

Not.

Lunch Break: Become a congregation captain for Obama

by LauraLoo

President Obama is urging African-Americans to pressure churches to advance his election and support his administration.  He is calling on voters to become “congregation captains.”

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BdjoHA5ocwU[/youtube]

Email LauraLoo with your Lunch Break suggestions.

[HT: Susie Allen]

Guidelines issued for Obamacare’s (hidden) $1 abortion surcharge

Yesterday the Department of Health and Human Services  issued its final rule for establishing state health care exchanges under Obamacare.

As expected, the rule provides for taxpayer funding of insurance coverage that includes elective abortion.

Let me back up. I spent some time talking to friends in the House this morning to understand and explain this.

Insurance companies that want to participate in Obamacare’s exchange program must follow certain guidelines – the “rule” issued yesterday, which is actually a whole bunch of rules.

The attraction for insurance companies to participate in the exchange program is that under Obamacare the federal government will pay all or a part of someone’s insurance premium who makes up to 400% above the poverty level. But those people can only choose their insurance from an Obama-approved company in the “exchange.” This amounts to thousands or millions or prospective new insurees whose payments will be totally or mostly guaranteed.

Insurance companies participating in the exchange program do not have to provide elective abortions. [UPDATE 3/14, 2:15p:  Douglas Johnson, Legislative Director for National Right to Life Committee, has sent me some corrections to my post, beginning here: “This is true, as far as the current rule goes.  But there is nothing in the law, or the rule, to prevent the Obama Administration from later requiring health plans in general (whether on the exchange or off the exchange, whether subsidized or not) to cover all abortions as a ‘preventive service,’ using the same authority that has been employed to issue the recent contraceptive mandate.  The new rule on exchanges merely says that Title I of the Affordable Care Act cannot be construed to require an exchange-participating plan to provide abortions ‘as part of its essential health benefits, as described in section 1302(b) of the Affordable Care Act.’  (‘Essential health benefits is a term of art, referring to one type of federal mandate authorized under ObamaCare.  The ‘preventive health services’ authority is separate and distinct.”] In fact, some states have passed laws disallowing insurance companies in their states from offering elective abortions in the Obamacare exchange program.

But if an insurance company participating in the Obamacare exchange program does offer elective abortions, everyone who buys insurance from that company will have to pay a $1 separate surcharge every month to cover the cost of abortions. It doesn’t matter if you are pro-life. It doesn’t matter if you’re a 72-yr-old woman who will never abort. You have to pay the $1 surcharge. [UPDATE 3/14, 2:15p: Per Johnson: “The law and rule both say that the payment may not be less than $1 a month.  The ‘abortion surcharge’ could certainly be more than $1 a month.”]

If you pay for your insurance by check, you will have to write out two checks every month, one for the premium and one for $1. If you pay for your insurance by automatic bank withdrawal, you will see two withdrawals every month, one for the premium and one for $1. If you pay for your insurance by credit card, you will see two charges on your bill every month, one for the premium and one for $1. [UPDATE 3/14, 2:15p: Per Johnson: “There is nothing in the rule that actually spells out a two-payment scheme.  HHS has not yet spelled out the details of any payment scheme.”]

This was the accounting gimmick added by supposedly pro-life Democrat U.S. Senator Ben Nelson so the government could try to say it does not subsidize elective abortions. Nelson is now retiring, in small or large part due to this. Pro-lifers now abhor him.

But there’s more. The HHS rule issued yesterday will force insurance companies to go to great lengths to hide the reason for the $1 surcharge.

The rule states insurance companies will not be allowed to mention the surcharge in their advertising. They can only advertise the total premium amount.

The rule states insurance companies will not be allowed to itemize “abortion” on bank, credit card statements, or anywhere as the reason for the $1 monthly charge.

The only place the reason for the $1 monthly surcharge will be listed is in the 20 pages of fine print you get when you enroll in your insurance plan.

But people will ask. Abortion proponents know this and hate the separate surcharge. I’m hopeful Obamacare will never see the light of day, but if it does the $1 surcharge will only stigmatize abortion even more.

There is more to the rule that goes a bit into the weeds, but I’ll stop here. Steven Ertelt at LifeNews.com does a good job on pulling those weeds.

Thanking abortionists for their “good works” and “compassion”

Religious and secular providers alike often talk about their work as a calling, echoing the language that ministers’ use to describe their work in service to the holy. Both ministers and abortion-care providers are compelled to do the good works of compassion, justice, and mercy.

Saturday March 10th was Abortion Provider Appreciation Day. And all of us who have been blessed by the good works of abortion-care providers are encouraged to take a few moments to express their gratitude and appreciation….

In those times when you face an unplanned pregnancy, you will have somewhere to turn, a place that will allow you to choose what is best out of a hard situation, a place with people that will help you navigate the confusion, fear, and vulnerability. Life is hard. Things get messy….

To be a person of deep faith has never been easy. Our faiths call us to challenge the status-quo of injustice, no matter how unpopular our stances may be. Our faiths call us to take risks for compassion, justice, and mercy. This week, in your church, synagogue, temple, or mosque, consider how you can answer this call.

How will you let them know that in a harsh world devastated by coercion and violence, you understand that radical acts of compassion and justice, like providing abortion-care, are exactly what we need more of?

~ RH Reality Check, cross-posting at Daily Kos, March 12

[Photo via Daily Kos]

Obama administration kills embryo adoption program, funds abortions for detainees

I don’t know how much more of this man I can take. This is an evil, evil administration.

President Barack Obama has cut funding to the embryo adoption program that President George W. Bush launched by  in 2002. According to the Washington Times, March 4:

The federal government’s only program aimed at preventing the discarding of “extra” frozen human embryos is itself in danger of being discarded.

In a move that pro-lifers are calling more evidence of the Obama administration’s “pro-abortion slant,” the White House has sought to defund the Embryo Adoption Awareness Campaign in its fiscal 2013 budget.

The Department of Health and Human Services “is not requesting funds for this program” because “the Embryo Adoption program will be discontinued in FY2013,” HHS officials said in a February funding report to Congress….

The HHS report said the reason to end the $1.9 million embryo-adoption awareness program is “limited interest.” Only a “very small pool of applicants, many of whom are repeat recipients,” are seeking the grants, it said.

Mailee Smith, staff counsel at Americans United for Life, said such a decision is more evidence of “the pro-abortion slant of this administration.”

“Why would the Obama administration cut $2 million for adoption awareness, but keep $1 million a day for Planned Parenthood?” she asked….

But in March 2009, President Obama authorized more funding for embryonic stem-cell research, and federal guidelines now let couples donate unwanted frozen embryos to such researchers with the proviso that they cannot receive cash, services or special treatment in exchange for their donations.

So Obama freed up funding for human embryo experimentation, made a way for parents to donate their children for dissection, and then cut funding for embryo adoption. How else can these actions be seen other than pro-death?

Meanwhile, according to CNS News on March 5:

Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the division the Department of Homeland Security responsible for enforcing the nation’s immigration laws, will provide “hormone therapy” to illegal aliens it has detained who say they are transgender, according to the agency’s operations manual for its detention facilities….

The ICE detention operations manual also says that illegal alien detainees who are pregnant will be provided with help not just for an impending delivery but also in obtaining an abortion….

Abortions will be taxpayer-funded if the life of the mother is deemed to be endangered or the pregnancy is the result of rape or incest, and ICE will arrange transportation to the abortionist at no cost to the detainee.

One guess as how many healthy but abortion-minded detainees say they were the victims of rape. And who’s to know? There is also no gestational age restriction in ICE’s operations manual. So theoretically a mother who is seven months pregnant could be detained, cry rape, and get a taxpayer-funded abortion. It is not outside the realm of possibility to think there are some who might be purposefully detained so as to get taxpayer funded abortions.

This man MUST be replaced in November. The depths of his pro-death agenda is unfathomable.

[Photo of President Bush holding a baby who was adopted as an embryo via USA Today; bottom photo via The Daily Beast]

Join “Where’s the Freedom” webcast tomorrow night


Students for Life of America will host a live webcast tomorrow night, March 13, at 9p EST, to discuss the Obama Administration’s attack on religious liberty via the HHS contraception mandate.

Learn what’s at stake if this dangerous violation of our constitutional freedoms stands. And learn how you can help stop the Obama Abortion Drug Mandate.

This is a one-time-only webcast and will last 25 minutes.

Joining it will be Senator Rand Paul, Congressman Jeff Fortenberry, Helen Alvare of George Mason University, Tom McClusky of Family Research Council Action, and David Bereit of 40 Days for Life.

Register now for the “Where’s the Freedom?” webcast here.

Doonesbury ultrasound “rape” cartoon series stirs controversy; newspapers spike

Click to enlarge…

The last time newspapers spiked leftist Gary Trudeau’s political cartoon series Doonesbury was in 1985 when he parodied the pro-life film documentary, The Silent Scream, which showed an actual abortion. Now that one must have been a hoot.

But Trudeau maintains passing up the transvaginal ultrasound = rape meme “would have been comedy malpractice,” as quoted by UPI. Again, more abortion humor.

[Read the rest of this entry…]

Lunch Break: Mom of 10 leaves child behind

by LauraLoo

A Texas mom of 10 leaves one of her daughters behind at a Chuck E. Cheese  and doesn’t realize she is missing until the next morning.

Hello?!?!  How could this possibly happen?  No accounting for each child before she drove home?  Or, at the very least, shouldn’t she have noticed one of my children’s beds is empty. 

What’s just as bad… no one else in the family noticed either.

Moms with very large families – we’d especially love your input!

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YkF-O6UuSas[/youtube]

Email LauraLoo with your Lunch Break suggestions.

[HT: ABC 7 Chicago]

 

 


Who Is Jill Stanek?

Jill Stanek is a nurse turned speaker, columnist and blogger, a national figure in the effort to protect both preborn and postborn innocent human life.

Read Jill's full bio »
What the Media says »

  • May 2016
  • December 2015
  • October 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005

  • Categories
  • Stanek Top 20

    Latest Posts

    Latest Comments