by intern Heather B. Spotlighting important information gleaned from other pro-life blogs…

by Wesley Smith notes a changed clause in Senator Reid’s health care bill could force insurance providers in states where assisted suicide is legal to include assisted suicide in their plans: If assisted suicide, or even euthanasia, are legally considered forms of “end of life care” in a particular state – as it is now […]

by Stephanie Simon has an article in the Wall Street Journal which is sure to get more than a few pro-choicers fuming. Simon notes the Stupak amendment is unlikely to change how abortion is paid for by the vast majority of women: Although the bill has stirred passions on both sides of the abortion-rights debate […]

Didn’t pro-aborts spend an

by he claimed “under our plan, no federal dollars will be used to fund abortions” when the legislation at that time included abortion funding. Now that the legislation has been amended to remove abortion funding via the Stupak amendment and prevents abortion coverage from being federally subsidized, Obama is sending out

by Michael Steele has called for the removal of abortion coverage from their health insurance plan after Wendy Norris is now claiming money was another probable reason for the Catholic bishops’ support of the Stupak amendment. Despite the vast majority of abortions being performed in abortion clinics and not hospitals, Norris thinks the bishops wanted […]

I don’t know when it happened. Maybe we’re in the middle of it. But a couple unrelated observations yesterday made me realize “pro-choice” is losing its coolness in liberaland. 1st was Amie Newman’s post on

by Carlton Veazey from the Religious Coaltion for Reproductive Choice claims the Stupak amendment is “an encroachment on the separation of religion and state and an affront to a basic constitutional principle.”