The White House launched a healthcare “Reality Check” website today.
I’ll address the White House’s anti-euthanasia spin in my next post, but for now, do you notice a certain topic missing from “Reality Check” rollout? That’s right, abortion….
Interesting.
Violations will be deleted and you may be banned.
Threats will be immediately reported to authorities.
Following these rules will make everyone's experience visiting JillStanek.com better.
Our volunteer moderators make prudent judgment calls to provide an open forum to discuss these issues. They reserve the right to remove any comment for any reason. Jill's decisions on such moderations are final.
Go to gravatar.com to create your avatar.
Jill Stanek is a nurse turned speaker, columnist and blogger, a national figure in the effort to protect both preborn and postborn innocent human life.
“This isn’t about politics. It’s about people’s lives.” – B.O.
=======================================
…and how he will end it.
Hmmm…why doesn’t he finish the sentence.
Again..the voice of the unborn is not heard….
Again..the voice/plight of the unborn is not heard….
So by “reality check” they mean “blatant lies.”
what did “dead fish Rahmbo” say “Never let a good crisis go to waste”. For all the Kool-aid drinkers out there who think this is about healthcare and not about power, control, social engineering, socialized government, “the Chicago way” and ABORTION-ON-DEMAND someone should offer to sell you the San Francisco bridge. This is a dream come true for Alinsky, Ayers, Jeremiah Wright and Margaret Sanger all in one bill.
Choice is silent in this healthcare debate?
Something tells me a master plan was laid out in 2007 and what’s happening right now is the execution.
What’s bothering team Obama Pelosi etc is the opposition to it all.
Brought to you by the real “Brooks Brothers” crowd!
Prolifer L, this is what I argued with my friends who supported Obama before the election. I knew he would be a corrupt Chicago politician. Had he fought the machine there and “changed” something there, I might have had some respect for him. We now have President Tony Soprano and his gang of thugs.
I know Luana, Obama the “change you can believe in” candidate, NEVER fought against the status quo in his own party, he never fought them or uncovered ethics violations, pay-to-play, corruption schemes, Daley, the Democratic political machine, voted present on anything of substance and never saw an abortion bill he didn’t like. How about that for a change maker? Your friends who voted for Obama drank the Kool-aid unfortunately.
The press failed in their job. Had a black republican with the same resume run for for president, the press would have shredded him and he would likely be under indictment like old Blago.
The simple fact is that the Hyde amendment cited by liberals as why this “reform” won’t include abortion are applying the trick of misdirection. Hyde only applies to medicaid money. This new monster will have abortion funding and it will have a disparate impact on minorities. BO administration is committing genocide with this bill. To balance it his team will have to create mandates that coerce whit women into aborting.
Next, in an effort to “encourage” women to abort defective babies after mandatory genetic screening. In England 92.8% choose to abort.
I just wonder about the universal record keeping. I mean if someone has an abortion, that will be in the records that will be instantly available to every practitioner. So when you go to the dentist, dermatologist, orthopedist, etc. all the clerks in the office who pull up your records to see if you are allergic to penicillin, will see, oh yeah, you had an abortion.
So much for abortion and privacy.
“Next, in an effort to “encourage” women to abort defective babies after mandatory genetic screening. In England 92.8% choose to abort.”
Mark, what do you bet they make all women get the tests. Right now young women often don’t do the tests and they are the ones who have the most children with defects. Older women have a higher rate but not a higher total number. I bet the gov’t qualified plans will be required to pay for the testing for all women. Expensive, yes, but the gov’t wants people to be healthy. I would bet money they will make all plans pay for prenatal testing for all women and then they will probably try to make them sign some document saying they understand that they baby will have a problem, yada, yada just to further intimidate women into aborting. Sure they will say technically they can’t force the women to sign or have tests, or have abortions, but they will have multiple “counseling” opportunities to recommend tests, promote abortions or try to pressure women and try to make them feel overwhelmed, outnumbered, guilty etc as well as putting pressure on the spouse to work on her too.
Better to title the website “Reality Rewrite” than “Reality Check”… ugh
Oh, Hippie, I don’t think they’ll stop there…the pressure will increase to include loss of healthcare services to the mother or the resulting “defective” child, all in the name of saving money. Her “choice” will be;
kill the baby
OR
you’re on your own financially
Some choice.