Abortion proponents oppose letting child rapists off but support killing rapists’ children?
NOW New York City tweeted this a few hours ago…
The link went to a sherights.com story, which linked to a New York Post story of apparently a terrible injustice served against a child rape victim:
Disgraced WABC sportscaster Marvell Scott (pictured right) will serve only 20 days of community service after pleading guilty today in a sickening child prostitution rap.
In the wrist-slap deal, Scott, 36, admitted only to misdemeanor endangering the welfare of a child. The girl had been offered to him as a prostitute in Times Square back in 2008, and was only 14 years old, prosecutors had charged in court papers.
The entire story is too awful for me to print. But the rape was not just statutory, it was nonconsensual.
NOW NYC is right. The story is “disgusting.”
But NOW’s disgust is selective. Had Scott impregnated the girl, NOW would have supported killing Scott’s baby, because his or her mother was the victim of rape.
So on one hand NOW et al feign “disgust” with child rapists getting away with their crimes but on the other hand promote killing the children of rapists, who themselves are also innocent victims of the crime.
It’s not easy being mean.
Jill Stanek is a nurse turned speaker, columnist and blogger, a national figure in the effort to protect both preborn and postborn innocent human life.
nothing new under the sun here. abortion clinnics have always been pro rape and anti woman. i guess your empowerment comes when you kill the baby on the surgical table
and they are business savvy. they want minors to come for abortions
planned parentless isn’t going to help you out of prostitution with their billions. what for? they want more money and they know. the girl will be back to abort again
and just a little something to think about. maybe time to reevaluate your life. we sit in our comfey homes eat our favorite foods watch TV. listen to music and every day 4000 children are killed in abortion clinics. you will live 1 life you will die 1 death
George Tiller is on fire day and night begging for mercy. it is too late. the unrepentant militant feminists will join him
there are no hero signs allowed in hell. there is only torment for eternity
make peace with God today. you may not have tomorrow or even tonight
my husband’s friend just got word that he is dying of liver cancer
he’s called crying 2 nights in a row saying “this is it” and he’s scared
this is where the rubber meets the road so think about you because everyone here will. all die one day
What makes you suppose NOW is “feigning” their disgust at the rape? How do you know that it’s not real disgust?
True, there is a great disconnect in their minds between rape and pregnancy from rape. It’s just that when when the word “rape” is next to the term “abortion” they have a Pavlovian reaction that isn’t present when “child rape” occurs alone. At least, I guess that’s what’s happening.Sincere disgust at rape wouldn’t conflict with them being wrong (and stupid) in regard to the abortion after rape question.
It’s not necessary or wise to always think the worst about your opponent. Believe me, if I don’t speak about this, our resident trolls will. (I’m just trying to cut them off at the pass).
what would be the moral difference between covering under age prostitution and covering under age abortions? well PP does both and NOW would only scandal if the rapist is caught and get away with it!! how many times has NOW turn their eyes away when under age women are coerce into abortion!! denying the truth about the videos presented by life action ? that is DISGUSTING ALSO!!!! that is the BIG problem with PARTIALITY, always comes short!!
you know what NOW stands for don’t. you guys? nasty old women! lol
Ouch!!
Oh, I am pretty sure NOW is disgusted by child rape just as much as anyone is. Lori said it well.
Jack nah they turn a good profit and why isn’t. law enforcement notified. Jack. men with your nonchalant attitude about minors aborting creeps me out. it’s like you condone it
also i have called the women from NOW and attempted to call them to the carpet on a few of their policies. the bottom line -if you’re not pro death they don’t. have time
sorry call holding on the other line
Hi Heather,
Do you think you might be getting a laptop soon?
I don’t condone abortion in any way. I just disagree with claiming that abortion proponents think that cases like this are awesome. Most of us think that aborting a minor’s child is about as abhorrent as abusing the minor in the first place. Abortion proponents seem to think they are doing girl’s a favor. They are horribly horribly wrong, but it’s a stretch to think that they are super-happy that some poor girl was raped and abused.
Jill thank you for stating the obvious that is always and deliberately ignored. Yes the rapists go free and the woman and her child are in silent prisons for their life!
Please join me to honor women who saved their babies against society’s death wish for the rape conceived. Nov. 20 2011 will be the first in the history of mankind. Maybe now people will hear the truth and this paradigm shift will begin.www.choices4life.org
God bless you for spreading truth.
There’s the fact that the pro-aborts have profited considerably by concealing the fact of statutory rape, and have fostered more of it by servicing the industry.
Copious audio and video evidence of this practice is available. Lawsuits against abortion clinics have been filed by statutory rape victims.
Carla. yes my regular. computer. is sitting on my desk but not turned on. i will have to call at and t oh and I’m glad you caught me. I’d. like to email you or even talk with you but the Guy at the cell phone store hooked up some Gmail and i will find it later and test it when i find you. would that be okay?
Jack. call a now organization and tell them you are prolife. they won’t. be warm fuzzy and friendly those are the hard militant feminazis
Jack sorry i thought you were pro death
Your posts are very hard to read is all, Heather. :)
Of course you can email me.
PLEASE pray for a 14 year old pregnant girl in Pennsylvania scheduled for an abortion today. She is 8 weeks along.
She has been offered help and support and folks to adopt her precious baby.
THANK YOU!!
My question is.. where is the girl now? And what is being done to help her?
Like I just said.
All offers of help and support and precious people wanting to adopt were offered.
Once the decision to abort has been made ALL contact is usually shut down which is what happened.
So to those that will join me in praying THANK YOU!!
i have said my prayers for her
Said a quick prayer for the 14 year old. I hope she doesn’t abort :(
@Lori: I totally agree. I’m sure that the disgust is real, for all that NOW does not recognize abortion as another form of assault against children. But the thing that makes prejudice so insidious is that those people who have it can’t see it as a bad thing. Most NOW members and supporters not only don’t recognize the unborn as people, but don’t even understand why they should try to. So of course they won’t be able to see the truth about abortion. While that makes them inadvertent hypocrites, that doesn’t mean they don’t genuinely hate rape.
they may very well hate rape but by not reporting victims of rape or incest they may as well condone it i don’t like animal abuse but if i saw a human beating their dog and didn’t. report it then i cannot possibly hate it that much!
Like I just said.
All offers of help and support and precious people wanting to adopt were offered.
Once the decision to abort has been made ALL contact is usually shut down which is what happened.
This is unfortunate. :( And it also flies in the face of “well, if more pro-lifers were willing to adopt, there would be fewer abortions!” tripe.
“they may very well hate rape but by not reporting victims of rape or incest they may as well condone it i don’t like animal abuse but if i saw a human beating their dog and didn’t. report it then i cannot possibly hate it that much!”
Don’t confuse NOW with Planned Parenthood. I have no seen anything anywhere that NOW does not take reporting statutory rape obligations seriously.
Hal can you show me some proof that now reports rape so i can put it to bed?
When anyone is raped it is about not having a choice. When a woman chooses to have an abortion it is about having a choice.
If the girl in this case had fallen pregnant and elected to continue with that pregnancy, I would have supported her choice just as equally as I would have if she chose not to continue with the pregnancy.
“feign “disgust” – I don’t think so.
“Hal can you show me some proof that now reports rape so i can put it to bed?”
Heather, first of all, I doubt NOW gets many reports of statutory rape. They’re not really in the loop for those kinds of reports. Second of all, I think the better practice would be to assume that an organization is not committing crimes until you hear at least a little evidence to the contrary.
Hal so in other words you have no clue. it figures!
In other words, it is generally bad practice to accuse people of crimes without evidence. There is evidence that PP covered up rape, that doesn’t automatically extend to NOW.
Heather, do you have “a clue?” If not, I suggest you refrain from accusations. In other words, what Jack said.
Hal. i usually ignore your posts. i question there authenticy. your. responses are usually based on opinion so why don’t we just ignore each other. you have been here as long as i have always talking about how wonderful you .and your wife feel about your 2 abortions and I’m. over it!
and no Hal you still don’t have a clue. and if you have the facts post them. now knows plenty about rape and abortion so go get some facts and post em!
:: sticks tongue out at Heather ::
should say their authenticity
.
..and Hal whenever you answer the questions it’s like this “we’re fine” “we have no regrets” ooookay then what do you want to do? waste your time trying to convert a pro lifer? it will never happen!
gee Doug. sounds like you need a bag of doritoes
oh let me just. take it all back
NOW is an incredible organization and they care so much. I’m thrilled that they report. rape and incest. I’m thrilled that they help women in crisis. I’m thrilled they welcome. the POV of pro lifers. my bad
Heather, I certainly don’t think that NOW is a good thing. At all. I am just not willing to accuse people of horrible crimes without a shred of proof. It’s like accusing a drug addict of being a murderer. Just because someone is wrong and is doing something bad in one way doesn’t mean that you can throw charges at them and demand they prove they DIDN’T do it.
Well, actually, it’s free speech so you can say what you want. But it isn’t wise.
If a female pregnant by a rape was to say she simply couldn’t stand to carry to term and give birth to the child of an attack, should she be denied an abortion?
If she is denied a legal abortion, what should be done to prevent her from seeking an illegal one or trying to self-abort?
Heather, I haven’t tried to turn anyone “pro choice” in quite some time. (maybe never). I do like to point out now and then when someone goes overboard with an argument, or attacks our president without good cause, or makes a ridiculous comment about gay people. Other than that, I’m supporting your right to try to change the hearts and minds of Americans about legal abortion. I’m support CPCs and the work they do (as I understand it), and I’m trying to be respectful as a guest on a site where my views are certainly in the minority.
Not only am I authentic. I’m happy.
What about the possibility of inducing a kind of sleep for several months so that the female can carry and give birth without the psychological torture?
This is not an off-the-wall, facetious suggestion. It’s an attempt to suggest a situation that is difficult to adequately address.
What about the possibility of inducing a kind of sleep for several months so that the female can carry and give birth without the psychological torture?
Wha??? What about telling her she is strong and capable and that out of very evil situations, good can and will come about? What about introducing her to other rape survivors and their children? What about getting together a strong support group for her and telling her you will be with her every step of the way?
Or just induce a coma for several months.
Praxedes says:
August 21, 2011 at 11:34 am
What about the possibility of inducing a kind of sleep for several months so that the female can carry and give birth without the psychological torture?
Or just induce a coma for several months.
(Denise) This is my suggestion. The problem is that it might not be certain that she can be brought out of the coma after the baby is delivered. Is it possible to induce a situation in which she is essentially asleep for a few months? Can things be done to increase the possibility of pleasant dreams during the quasi-hibernation?
If this could be done, many more pregnancies might be carried to term that would otherwise not be because of the girl or woman’s psychological torture.