Doctor: It is a “sacrifice” to do abortions instead of deliveries
by Carder
Despite years of training and a passion for obstetrics, I decided to stop delivering babies so that I could provide abortions. I could no longer turn my back on the patients who need abortion care…
I still consider giving up obstetrics to be my biggest sacrifice to do this work. I was good at it and derived immense satisfaction from it.
The process of delivering a baby was a rush.
~ Dr. Nicole Fanarjian, explaining one of the reasons why she discontinued obstetrics in favor performing abortions regularly, as quoted by Think Progress, March 31
Apr.03, 2015 6:00 am |
Abortionist quacks & pervs |
Jill Stanek is a nurse turned speaker, columnist and blogger, a national figure in the effort to protect both preborn and postborn innocent human life.
She didn’t really say why…
Just that she considered it important work and was something she had to do at great personal sacrifice.
Perhaps, she feels compelled to recapitulate her own abortion experience.
Dr. Nicole,
I’m sorry to have to tell you this but you are a spiritually blind, morally bankrupt serial killer of children.
God’s children
Consider yourself extremely fortunate that you still have time to repent before you stand before your Maker and Judge. You will have to give an account for how you used the talents, gifts and education you were given/afforded.
I can tell you right now because I know. Killers of innocent children? They do not fare well at the Judgment Seat of Christ. They just don’t.
If you seek the Lord with a broken and contrite heart, with all of your heart, and tell Him you’re sorry for killing so many of His children, He may grant you repentance. This is your only hope of escaping His furious wrath and eternal punishment. You must cleanse your hands from the innocent blood that covers them.
This is your only hope.
Oh, it’s been a “sacrifice” alright.
But of a different kind than this doctor seems to recognize.
A few similar articles are popping up on Stanekreport.com.
I see this as part of the abortion industry’s effort to “remove the stigma” and make abortion more “acceptable to the mainstream.” We need to keep an out out and counter this. Amanda Marcotte can blather all she wants, and RHRealityCheck has been pushing this theme for years — but when abortionists with credentials like “MD” and “OB/GYN” write articles in the mainstream liberal news outlets, it lends some credibility to their message.
We need to be out there with psychologists and social scientists, with facts and data to show the tremendous amount of damage and suffering that women have after abortion — not because of “stigma,” but because abortion hurts women with physical and psychological injuries that no amount of “acceptance” can heal.
Our society accepts alcohol, but alcoholism and drunk drivers still injure millions of people. Abortion is the same sort of thing. More abortion means more suffering.
Del, repeat after me. Abortion doesn’t hurt women. The idea of post-abortion grief is nothing more than a lie propagated by anti-choice extremists in their efforts to take away a woman’s right to control her body.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Ks-dS0qm68
Navi,
Try telling the numerous women at Silent No More, Rachel’s Vineyard, and other post-abortive ministries that abortion did not hurt them. Are they lying about their experience? I have met and listened to some of them. Why would they put themselves out there at public rallies and marches to perpetuate “anti-choice extremism” to take away control of their body? Furthermore, female pro-lifers have control over their bodies just fine without abortion.
The body inside the mother is not her body. That body belongs to someone else. Someone who has his or her own unique DNA code. Someone who may have a different blood type, skin, eye, or hair color than his or her mother. Someone who has penis that his mother does not. Someone who may be a twin or have a cleft lip that the mother does not.
Try telling the numerous women who have been carted off in ambulances that abortion did not hurt them. Try telling the numerous women who have sued their abortionists for negligence or malpractice that abortion did not hurt them. I know of one case personally. The mother has been in a coma for over a decade following her abortion at a Planned Parenthood in Kansas City. She left behind an emotionally scarred son who was eight years old at the time. Try telling the hundreds of women who have died since Roe v Wade that abortion did not hurt them. Oh wait, you can’t because they are dead. These events are well documented in 911 calls, on video, in court records, in newspapers, etc. and yet abortion supporters propagate the lie that abortion is harmless.
I was being facetious, MoJoanne. Click on the link.
Thanks, for setting me straight.
Doctor, you confuse need with want. Abortion is an elective procedure.
Navi, the video that followed after yours..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hOWMmx6eBjU