Pro-life videos of the day: Does Hollywood speak for women?

by Hans Johnson

Hollywood celebrities have recently urged the signing of a Bill of Reproductive Rights:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mniw30c8Kj4[/youtube]

But despite half a century of abortion advocacy from Hollywood and the mainstream media, more women consider themselves pro-life  than not. Here is a response to them produced by Concerned Women For America:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ro27bPKGttg[/youtube]

Email dailyvid@jillstanek.com with your video suggestions.

[HT: Jill]

Pro-life student incurs wrath of pro-abortion Christian college

Concordia College in Moorhead, Minnesota, is affiliated with the pro-abortion Evangelical Lutheran Church of America.

So while Concordia touts “sending into society thoughtful and informed men and women dedicated to the Christian life,” its definition of “Christian” is at least in part unrelated to the Bible.

Bearing Concordia’s pro-abortion ideology in mind, it comes as no surprise that the school is threatening disciplinary action against 20-yr-old student Kate Engstrom for posting a video on YouTube of Minnesota Congressman Collin Peterson dissing Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life for refusing to endorse him for reelection.

MCCL had previously endorsed the supposed pro-life Democrat but took a pass this time because Peterson voted against repealing Obamacare, which includes abortion funding and the infamous mandate forcing religious employers to cover contraceptives, sterilization, and abortion drugs.

In the video Peterson calls MCCL “a bunch of extremists” and predicts, “This is the end of them as an organization,” because they opposed Obamacare, apparently rendering them partisan.

According to The Daily Caller, Concordia has now backpedaled on its threat to discipline Engstrom. Sunlight always helps. Here’s the video…

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lnAiz8Q8GHE[/youtube]

[HT: reader Joe D.; photo via Minnesota Public Radio]

Associated Press poll: What gender gap?

A friend forwarded me a media advisory yesterday that DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Planned Parenthood CEO Cecile Richards were holding a press call to demand that Mitt Romney pull his ad endorsing Indiana U.S. Senate candidate Richard Mourdock following his statement upholding the sanctity of life for children conceived in rape.

So I got on the call.

The schpeel was typical. Republicans are radically anti-choice. Republicans want to take away birth control coverage. “Mitt Romney threatens the future for women in America,” clamored Richards. “He and Richard Mourdock have pledged allegiance to the most extreme GOP platform in our lifetime, which would not only overturn Roe but also give rights to fertilized eggs.”

Richards said Romney would turn back the clock 40 years to the pre-Roe days, a new time regression, I noted. At other times she has said Romney would turn back the clock 50 years, and at still other times she has said Romney was stuck in a 70-yr-old time warp. So goes the Planned Parenthood fertility rights calendar.

But I digress.

Most interesting to me were the questions from reporters at the end. There were only a few. But they went somewhere unexpected, and they came from unexpected sources.

From a journalist at liberal Talking Points Memo: “What’s the thinking on the gender gap closing rather than expanding?”

And from a journalist at The Root, an online division of the Washington Post catering to African-Americans: “Why do you think this message hasn’t been gaining ground among women?”

The lame answer from a DNC spokesperson whose name I didn’t catch: “We had leads in both states and nationally, and demographics that were unsustainable. There was a gender gap 26-28 points that was never going to be sustainable. The natural contraction of these things shouldn’t be seen as anything but normal.”

I’ve been posting polls for months showing the “war on women” meme isn’t a Republican bra-burner. So shows the latest, currently spotlighted on Drudge, from the Associated Press. The new normal, I hope…

Those churning gender dynamics leave the presidential race still a virtual dead heat, with Romney favored by 47% of likely voters and Obama by 45%….

As the election nears, Romney has been playing down social issues and trying to project a more moderate stance on matters such as abortion in an effort to court female voters. The AP-GfK poll, taken Friday through Tuesday, shows Romney pulling even with Obama among women at 47-47 after lagging by 16 points a month earlier.

[Top photo via Drudge]

Biased MSM bashes pro-life-no-exceptions view, ignores opposite

[C]onsider that Gallup reports that 52% of Americans support some restrictions on abortion, and an additional 20% think it should be illegal in all circumstances. That’s nearly three-quarters of the population saying they support at least some restrictions on abortion. Only 25% share President Obama’s view that abortion should be legal for any reason at any time in the pregnancy, including sex-selection abortions and partial-birth abortions.

Now, even though the vast majority of Americans favor some protection for unborn children from abortion, consistent pro-choice positions don’t generate media interest. Only consistent pro-life positions do. What’s the journalistic defense for that double standard, I wonder?…

[I]t’s worth noting that no debates ever ask any consistent pro-choice candidates why they think there should be no protection for unborn children whose lives are ended simply because they’re female, or because they have Down syndrome, or because they’re inconveniently timed, or because of the circumstances of their conception. Nope, even though the vast majority of Americans seek some or total protection for unborn children, these questions are never asked. Not even of President Obama, whose voting habits while in the Illinois Senate were particularly extreme.

But if you’re consistently pro-life, then release the hounds. If you publicly affirm your belief that God loves every person equally, no matter what his or her origin, you’re painted as an extremist….

Are the members of the political media so incurious as to not have thought about why consistent pro-lifers oppose all abortion?

~ Blogger mollie, Patheos.com, October 24

[Photo via floppingaces.net]

Pro-life vid of the day: Pro-life politician’s rape comment wildly and purposefully distorted

by LauraLoo and Kelli

During last night’s GOP Senate debate, Richard Mourdock said that the only abortion exception he believes in is to save the life of the mother. But it is his comments on pregnancies as a result of rape that have caused controversy.

Here are Mourdock’s comments, as quoted by FoxCarolina.com:

I struggled with it myself for a long time, but I came to realize that life is that gift from God. And, I think, even when life begins in that horrible situation of rape, that it is something that God intended to happen.

After his comments were twisted by the liberal media and opportunistic politicians, Mourdock clarified:

Are you trying to suggest somehow that God preordained rape, no I don’t think that,” said Mourdock. “Anyone who would suggest that is just sick and twisted. No, that’s not even close to what I said.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q5n1KzTVXuA[/youtube]

I don’t believe it is God’s will for a woman to be raped, but I do believe He can take evil in this sin-sick world and turn it into something good.

Mitt Romney has already come out to say he disagrees with Mourdock’s remarks.

From an NRO article entitled, “The highjacking of Richard Mourdock”:

Nonetheless, it was clear what he was saying. For anyone possessed of even a passing familiarity with the argument against rape and incest exceptions, his point should not have been difficult to grasp. (Therein, one suspects, lies the problem.) To wit: If an unborn child is indeed a life, then how it became one – however ghastly that was – is rendered irrelevant. This position could be summed up by saying that “life is life is life,” and that its sanctity cannot be diminished by the circumstances of its creation. There are myriad philosophical and moral arguments to be offered on this question, but Richard Mourdock has made no secret about the position he takes. This is not news, and to pretend otherwise is disingenuous.

Your thoughts?

Email dailyvid@jillstanek.com with your video suggestions.

[HT: 89 WLS Chicago]

BREAKING: Live Action investigation reveals Planned Parenthood lies about safety

From Live Action’s press statement:

Three months ago, 24-year-old Tonya Reaves stepped into a Planned Parenthood clinic in Chicago for an abortion, never realizing her life was in danger. It was.

Planned Parenthood’s abortionist perforated Tonya’s uterus, and she bled to death hours later.

When Live Action investigators called the Chicago clinic, posing as a woman with concerns about the health risks of abortion, Planned Parenthood lied to the would-be abortion client and denied anyone had been hurt. Our investigative team called 6 other Planned Parenthoods where recent medical emergencies had been documented, including hemorrhaging after abortion.

Every clinic lied about the risk.…

Live Action investigators called Planned Parenthood abortion clinics with recent cases of medical emergencies and botched abortions in 7 different states asking if Planned Parenthood’s abortion practice was safe and if women had ever been hurt at these clinics. Not a single Planned Parenthood abortion clinic even acknowledged the recent injuries of women.

As President Obama campaigns for women voters, one of his top donors and champions, Planned Parenthood, continues to deceives millions of American women about the services they provide, their history of sexual abuse cover-up, their radical pro-abortion agenda, and just this past July, their unsafe and abusive practices that led to the death of 24-year-old Tonya Reaves in Chicago, IL.

The investigative video…

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pSoPys6KybI[/youtube]

Masked abortionist threatens legal action for exposure

Denver abortionist Reid Goodman really, really doesn’t want anyone to know he commits abortions at Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains, so much so that he wears a mask to work. Looks somewhat like Jason’s.

This is because Goodman is part of a legitimate practices, Mile High OB/GYN (although it, too, commits abortions).

Pro-life activist Tony Massey discovered Goodman had posted a promotional video for his practice on YouTube (removed this past weekend).

Tony decided to juxtapose Goodman’s happy face (pictured left) with his masked face (pictured above right) in his own video…

Although the scenarios were different, the intent of Tony’s video was virtually identical to the intent of Center for Bio-Ethical Reform’s Northland video – to peel the mask off of abortion, pardon the pun, and expose its hidden reality. We all now know that although Northland Family Planning Centers sued CBR and Gregg Cunningham, they lost – and now owe a pile of money to CBR’s attorneys.

Yet on October 19 attorney Douglas Choi (pictured left) of TangoLaw sent Tony a “cease and desist” letter, giving him three days to remove his video from his website. Strangely, Choi wrote on behalf of the company that produced Reid’s video, DataSphere.Technologies, Inc.

So the three days is up. Back at you, Mr. Choi. Tony is not removing the video and has now gone further and also uploaded it to Pro-LifeTube.com.

Model Tyra Banks really, really wants babies!

I’m really ready to have some babies. I want babies!

I’ve always wanted them, but I’ve been saying ‘I want babies in three years’ since I was, like, 27. And now I’m 28…No, I’m 38 — I think it’s time. [My eggs are] going to be hard-boiled and fried and scrambled up in there, so it’s time to get those eggs working!

~ Model and media personality Tyra Banks, sharing her longing for motherhood in an interview on the Steve Harvey Show, as quoted by US Magazine, October 16


Who Is Jill Stanek?

Jill Stanek is a nurse turned speaker, columnist and blogger, a national figure in the effort to protect both preborn and postborn innocent human life.

Read Jill's full bio »
What the Media says »

  • May 2016
  • December 2015
  • October 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005

  • Categories
  • Stanek Top 20

    Latest Posts

    Latest Comments