weekend question.jpgPro-life/anti-life news didn’t stop yesterday, even though I wasn’t around to report it. Imagine that.
So I’m offering an extra weekend question to play a little catch-up.
Oklahoma legislators recently passed a comprehensive pro-life law ensuring mothers are not coerced to abort by forcing abortion mills to post signage; ensuring health care professionals are not coerced to abort or recommend to abort; forcing abortionists to follow FDA guidelines when administering RU-486; and forcing abortionists to provide ultrasounds before abortions….


Thursday pro-aborts filed a lawsuit challenging the law on many counts. For instance, the Center for Reproductive Rights told the court forcing abortionists to follow FDA guidelines for administering RU-486 will cause them to “cease performing medical abortions… rather than risking criminal conviction, civil liability and licensure penalties.”
ultrasound doctor.jpgBut it is the ultrasound portion that has them most riled. 3 other states have laws mandating ultrasounds before abortions, but OK is the first to say the abortionist must turn the screen toward the aborting mother and explain what s/he sees, although the law stipulates mothers may remain purposefully ignorant by averting their eyes.
But pro-aborts state making the abortionist rather than an LPN (1 rung below RN) perform the abortion would stop them from “meet[ing] the demand for abortions” so they “might not be able to remain in business,” according to the petition.
The Center also maintains “the requirement intrudes on privacy, endangers health and assaults the dignity of women,” according to the Associated Press.
Exactly how does OK’s ultrasound law intrude on privacy, endanger health, and assault the dignity of women? What’s so wrong with informed consent?
[HT: reader Charles C.]

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...