Rejected Stanek op ed to USA Today
On March 18 USA Today printed an op ed I wrote about the need to regulate the in vitro fertilization industry.
There is a backstory.
Following is the original op ed I submitted to USA Today, which its editors rejected.
The sensational story of Nadya Suleman giving birth to octuplets after in vitro fertilization of multiple embryos has spotlighted the need to regulate this Wild West of women’s reproductive care.
Currently sea turtles in the U.S. enjoy more procreative protection than women and children.
The procedure to garner eggs for IVF is potentially dangerous to women.
They inject numerous drugs and synthetic female steroids, including estrogen, a known carcinogen, over several weeks to stimulate several eggs to abnormally mature at once….
Side effects range from ovary enlargement and bursting to hemorrhage. Long-term effects are unknown.
The IVF procedure is certainly dangerous to preborn humans. The American Society of Reproductive Medicine states the “live delivery rate” of these embryos is 31.6 percent. So, seven in 10 die.
How? Usually 10 or fewer eggs are harvested, but sometimes more. These are fertilized. The resulting unique human beings are grown in a petri dish and checked for defects. Long-term consequences of removing one cell from an eight-cell human to biopsy are unknown.
Suspected imperfect embryos are killed. Typically the doctor will implant one to five unflawed embryos, although we now know there are no rules. If multiples survive, “selection reduction,” or abortion of some, is recommended.
Remaining embryos are frozen. Some die when thawed. Others are killed in the name of science.
Although the actual number of embryos designated for research is scant – 2.8 percent according to Rand Research – these have been touted as a reason for embryonic stem cell research. Otherwise embryos will die having served no useful purpose.
All the more reason to regulate the IVF industry.
Louisiana has had a law since 1985 defining ex utero embryos as human beings with inherent rights. Embryos cannot be destroyed for research. Court disputes over abandoned embryos must be decided in the best interest of the embryo.
All states should pass laws defining personhood as beginning at conception, and there is such a movement afoot.
Meanwhile the Suleman case has exposed a need to regulate the IVF industry, such as is in Germany, which limits the number of embryos implanted to the same number fertilized, up to three. This alone would stop the practice of freezing human embryos and curtail selective reductions.
With good reason, Germany is sensitive to the issue of mistreating human beings.
Jill,
I compared your the article you submitted to the one that was published.
It was like comparing a Camry to Lexus, after the Camry has been processed through the car jackers chop shop.
Next time USA Today asks you to submit an article I suggest you just let them write it for you and tell them they can use your name if they guarantee they will spell it correctly.
Make sure they have the correct spelling.
yor bro ken
Jill,
Here is another alternative to consider:
Next time you could request, in the interest of fairness, that you get to re-write their article for them and then write your own article in response to what you wrote for them.
Now that is freedom of the press.
yor bro ken
God Bless You, Jill for all you stand for.
It seems to me that your effectiveness and credibility is backed by God . Whenever we are given the opportunity to directly engage with the God haters we must be in His will…being led, not driven by dead lines or other pressures. If we proceed, do not forget that we are dealing with liars whose dad is the prince of lies. We will be more effective when we stop being surprised that satan is evil. You did a good job of pointing out the warning flags you passed along your decision path in the USA Today scenario.
We can not gain repentance through legislation. We need to believe and pray for God to cause repentance in Americans by His Spirit. Then we can enact God fearing legislation with Godly leadership elected by a God fearing majority. We love you in Texas, Jill, where we pray, literally, 24/7.
Anyone supporting abortion and claiming they are a Christian is a liar. Psm 139.
i would sue them if i were you, they cannot write their own article and use your name, i read both, its rediculous, i would definitely recommend you to take legal actions against them