New anti-Palin video by bear-en female grizzlies who kill their cubs
The pro-abortion, anti-honey pot PAC EMILY’s List, which claws to get anti-life Democrat women elected to Congress, has just launched a new Sarah doesn’t speak for me! website and a pretty funny video, I must say…
The problem, of course, is EMILY’s List and its bear-en followers abhor cubs, which makes it pretty hard to portend mama grizzliness.
And so the female grizzlies in EMILY’s video make such incoherent statements as, “Sure, I attack when my cubs are threatened,” and “But wanna know what threatens me? My daughter not having the right to choose.”
Um, no, you depraved, savage female grizzlies kill your cubs, thereby leaving no female offspring to kill their cubs, your grandcubs.
Nice try but what idiots.
“..I attack when my cubs are threatened”
——————————————
I wonder who they really think threaten their “cubs”….their no good, selfish “papa” bear, the veterinarian abortionist or Goldilocks??
And…oh, it’s not a cub, it’s just a clump of cells..with fur on it…
Can’t stop laughing! Hilarious!
Bring it. You will lose.
According to the women in the video a physical attack on their daughter is not the greatest personal attack, rather the greatest threat is an attack against their daughter’s right to kill her granddaughter.
Am I getting this right? The kidnapping of their daughter isn’t as threatening than the legal hurdles her daughter must navigate in order to get an abortion?
That was ridiculous.
That video is pretty funny lol
Look you can try to read into all the hidden meanings behind what those ladies said or you can just see it for what it is, a mildly entertaining rebuttal to Sara Palin’s attempt to paint all mothers with the same Pro-Palin brush. All the women I know think she is a moron as she demonstrated during her run for VP.
Wait, so you’re a “mama grizzly” because you don’t want to protect your “cubs” you want to kill them? Right, that makes a lot of sense…
Lauren, Lauren, Lauren,
You want to protect the cubs that you let live. silly
Oh and Lauren?
When the cubs that are allowed to live grow up to be pregnant with furry clumps of cells then the Mama Grizzlies growl for the right to kill their great grand cubs. I mean furry clumps of grand cells. GGGGRRRRRRRR
I hope this makes sense now.
Jill, I would have thought you would have been above that foolishness. I know you’re smart enough to recognize that lots of prochoice women choose to give birth and have children.
It would seem that Emily’s List is not above foolishness though.
They must be completely desperate.
They support their cubs’ right to choose? What? Did they support their aborted cubs’ right to choose? Nope.
“Right to choose” is a ridiculous term. Right to choose WHAT?
Others in the animal kingdom do not abort their young – only humans. Sad.
Mary Lee,
I never get an answer to that question!!!
I thought this was pretty hilarious! It’s nice to see there are a few pro-abortion liberals with an actual sense of humor!
As a “papa”-grizzly I’m feeling pretty left out!
The video is pretty silly. No healthcare? (um, it existed before Obamacare; the discussion is about financially responsible ways to provide healthcare); no unemployment benefits? (um, if small businesses are hiring because they’re not being taxed out of existence, you can work and earn your salmon), funding schools? isn’t that a LOCAL issue? Yep, same old tired liberal tax and spend and kill babies agenda.
I was at the Susan B. Anthony breakfast where she debuted her “mama grizzlies” and it was electrifying. Sarah Palin has mainstreamed the Pro-life movement. There are more Americans who are pro-life that who are anytime, any reason, and preferably taxpayer-funded abortion supporters like Emily’s List. And she fearlessly and consistently promotes pro-life candidates. She’s brave. And effective. Not so dumb, eh?
Because when Emily’s List makes this video trying to take down the “mama grizzly” image, they just can’t get away from the truth:
Mama Grizzly fighting to the death to protect her cubs from danger – beautiful and awesome and honorable.
Mama Grizzly fighting for a mama bear to kill her cubs – ugly and disturbing. Just like abortion.
Modern Ms. Goose: Goldilocks would have the bed all to herself: Mr. Bear decided there wasn’t enough porridge to go around, so he’s out driving Ms. Bear to the clinic to get some “healthcare.”
Mary Lee they support their cub’s right to choose when they will be a mama or papa grizzly. If you wish to give a fetus choices be my guest, but how are you going to get there answers… an email from fetus@inthewomb.com???
Susan – Yes they do. Very often in most species a mother will eat a newborn that is inferior to the rest of the litter. No that’s killing a BABY…
100% of women who get abortions are already mothers.
The quoted 60% (approx.) just happen to also have children that they allowed to survive in contrast to the child or children that they killed during their abortion(s).
Biggz,
I’m pretty sure the answer is fairly obvious. “Do you want to die, offspring?” “No”… It’s not like the preborn child is going to ever desire to be ripped limb-from-limb.
Thanks, I needed the laugh! No, really! Such a vain attempt to ridicule Sarah Palin. Might I say they acted stupidly.
Biggs - I wasn’t aware that animals eating their young after birth, is the same as women killing their young before birth. Yes animals do that, rarely. It’s most likely due to a genetic defect in either the female, or the litter. You can’t say that about the human babies that are killed every day, most of which are perfectly healthy.
I hope everyone here has done their research on grizzly bears. These bears will self-abort a pregnancy if they don’t have enough nutrients and calorie intake to make it through hibernation.
http://msmagazine.com/blog/blog/2010/07/21/dear-sarah-palin-refudiate-the-mama-grizzly-for-she-is%C2%A0pro-choice/
Um… KushielsMoon: you *do* realize that the so-called “self-abortion” is an automatic biological reaction, and not a “choice”, right? Don’t you think that affects the relevance of your comment?
“What *do* they teach them, at these schools?” -Prof. Kirke
Ashley, that is some of the most appallingly deceptive tripe that I’ve seen you post, here. (Granted, I don’t read many of your comments, after sampling the “flavour” of your first few.) I’m afraid you have no idea what you’re talking about, here, and you’ve taken a propaganda book and run with it.
Try this as an antidote:
http://www.catholicpillowfight.com/index.php?module=blog&BLG_user_op=category&BLG_category=17
— quote —
[rebuttal by Tony, at Catholic Pillow fight:]
You might notice that the article I referenced is somewhat old, less current than what I usually blog about. This statement angered me, and I decided to take some time to cool off before I decided to respond.
My Story
I am one of Father Baker’s Boys.
Father Nelson Baker founded the Our Lady of Victory orphanage and later the home for unwed mothers. He was a Civil War veteran and a successful businessman before he was 28. When he took over the orphanage building, which was comperable to Father Flannigan’s “Boy’s Town”, there were bars on the windows. He told the workers: “Take off those bars! I’m running a home, not a prison!”. The mayor was apprehensive figuring the orpah boys would escape and cause trouble, but there was never a problem caused by any of the children in the home. They lived up to Father Baker’s trust in them.
He is named “The Apostle of Charity”, and his cause is currently before the Vatican for his canonization as a Saint. My mother told me that no child was ever taken away from the mother at the orphanage. If a mother wanted to retain her rights, and visited her child once a year, that child was not adopted out. Many women chose this path (in my opinion, dooming their child to a life in the orphanage to satisfy their selfish desires). But no child was ever “stolen” from a mother at the home.
So I could project my experience onto all Catholic adoption agencies (as RCM seems to have done with the experience she read about) but I won’t. I know that Father Baker’s was a special place, and those who in their misfortune found themselves there were truly blessed as I was.
As a side note, I visited the Our Lady of Victory Baslilca and attended a mass there. This was completed by Father Baker in 1925 at a cost of $3.2M and was debt-free the year later.
This church is breathtaking. In 1998 Father Baker “came home” when his earthly remains were interred in the interior of the Basilica.
— end quote —
Nope, Biggz. Try again. Their cubs’ right to choose to kill their children? And, what, an unborn child can’t talk so his or her will to live doesn’t count? Like when the babies try to get away from the abortionist’s tools? Gee…..by that reasoning, a newborn can’t answer me or send an email either so I guess killing a newborn is okay, right? Or are you just talking about location? Because that’s ridiculous. Are you talking about viability? That’s arbitrary and swiftly shifting earlier and earlier. Are you using functionalism as an argument? Because by that reasoning, a person in a coma, a person who is severely disabled, or whatever criteria you pro-aborts use to define a “person” would be fair game for killing off as well.
Ashely, pro-choice women have babies, yes. And pro-life women have babies. Who cares if Ann Coulter doesn’t have any? You’d think the pro-aborts would applaud this. But I can’t take a pro-choice mother seriously. Because, what, THIS child deserved to live and THAT one didn’t? THIS child is “wanted” and THAT child was disposable? That’s so against anything feminist, and surely against anything maternal. That is a serious and disturbing disconnect.
Biggz and KushielsMoon
A spontaneous abortion is a miscarriage – the reabsorption of an embryo would be analogous to that.
Humans are the only animal who intentionally kill their unborn offspring.
Still sad.
What is it about these sort of videos that make me feel like my iQ points drop for each second I watch? The faulty assumptions, the failure to engage the whole argument, the personal attacks…
Yes, Ashley, it was feminists who supported a woman’s right to keep a baby. Many of those feminists were pro-life. As for feminists speaking out against the forced sterlization of black women, you’re aware that Margaret Sanger willingly gave speeches to the KKK, right? And not speeches about racial equality, either.
I’ve also read “The Girls Who Went Away” – it made me start crying several different times. “Forbidden Grief”, about the pain of post-abortive women, did the same thing. Reading both of them together is an incredibly strong argument for not getting pregnant until you’re ready to raise a baby.
Ashley, hon, there are a lot of people here who seriously want to help you. You don’t have to agree with everyone about everything in order to be pro-life. I think you know that abortion hurts women because you’re in a lot of pain yourself. I know there are other people here who keep being derogatory towards you, and I wish they’d lay off. Don’t let them stop you from dealing with your pain.
Hmm . . . interesting comments. I’m not a big fan of Sarah Palin, but I was with my very pro-abortion family (I mean pro-abortion — they are always talking about who “should” have an abortion and who “should” be forcibly sterilized), and they were absolutely incensed that Palin chose to give birth to her Down Syndrome child. Yes, Trig “should have” been aborted. They really despise mentally handicapped people, which is something that shocks and appalls me. Not all pro-choice people are this way, of course, but I think some of the dislike of Palin comes from the fact that she didn’t do what she “should have” done — terminate the pregnancy of an “imperfect” child. That sort of attitude really, really is repulsive to me.
Paladin – I don’t want to divulge my age and background, but WOW, you sure took me back with the quote about Father Baker! I haven’t heard his name in a long long time. Thanks so much!
When people try to rationalize abortion by talking about natural miscarriages, it really makes me sad. That’s like trying to rationalize child homicide by talking about how many kids drown, or die of cancer. Shall we legalize the murder of children up to the age of 10 because, y’know, lots of kids do die before they’re 10 anyway? So like, y’know, it’s perfectly natural, ‘n stuff.
Hi, Ninek!
You’re very welcome for the Fr. Baker quotes; he was an outstanding man (though I only learned about him recently)!
You wrote:
When people try to rationalize abortion by talking about natural miscarriages, it really makes me sad. That’s like trying to rationalize child homicide by talking about how many kids drown, or die of cancer. Shall we legalize the murder of children up to the age of 10 because, y’know, lots of kids do die before they’re 10 anyway? So like, y’know, it’s perfectly natural, ‘n stuff.
Okay, abortion-tolerant people, trolls, and the like: gather ’round. This (quoted bit), my abortion-championing friends, is an example of SOUND REASONING and LOGIC. Is it really so hard?!? (Beautiful, Ninek! And a lot more brief than my usual attempts! :) )
It was a common threat by local mothers to their misbehaving children, “Stop this instant or you’re going to Father Bakers!” I’m smiling as I write because it brings back fond memories of childhood. The first time I ever rode a public bus was to see Our Lady of Victory with my friend. She told me, “When Jesus comes back, those angels are going to turn real and start blowing their horns!” :>) Those were good times.
Phillymiss – Wow, that’s incredibly repulsive. My condolences that you’re related to these people.
Marauder, my father is an abortion supporter from way back. He is a pharmacist and before Roe he used to give women medicine (illegally, of course) to induce early abortions. I’m not sure what drug it was, maybe Dr. Nadal would know? I also remember him taking my cousin to have an illegal abortion. I was quite young, but I do remember her sitting by the toilet crying, and there was blood on the floor. My parents are both devout Christians, (or so they say). I also have a brother in California that volunteers as an escort at Planned Parenthood.
I love my family, even though it’s sometimes hard to do so. The funny thing is, my parents love their grandchildren, even though at least two of them (including my daughter), were unplanned. I wonder if they ever thought about that.