3/13, 9:10a: The italicized section on page 2 was my quote of the day yesterday. The author, a pro-abort liberal feminist, was trying to make the case that 1) contraceptives should be more widely available, and 2) men should take greater responsibility to preclude unwanted pregnancies.

But along the way she inadvertently made two key points, that 1) male enhancement medications may further exploit women sexually, and 2) male enhancement medications may exacerbate child rape. Because she also wrote:

But regardless of contraception and male enhancement there is an even bigger issue that we need to seriously confront. When we discuss teenage pregnancy, to assume that a female teen’s male counterpart is also a teen is often drastically incorrect. Studies have shown that 2/3rds of children born to teen mothers are fathered by adult men that are 20 years old or older. This clearly suggests a correlation between teen mothers and older men. Are teen girls more likely to become pregnant if they are being intimate with an older man rather than someone their own age?

According to studies out of CA, men older than high school age fathered 77% of all births to girls between 16 and 18 years of age. What is worse, men over 20 years of age fathered five times as many children of JUNIOR HIGH school girls than did junior high school boys. Shouldn’t we begin to have a dialogue on the issues of statutory rape and the enforcement of these laws? It is obvious that we need to focus on studies regarding the men responsible for these pregnancies. Where is the outrage of these abuses? Why are we focusing our attention on abortion when there are clearly urgent issues closer to the root of the problem?

Obviously male enhancement medications allow older men to have sex when they otherwise couldn’t due to their petering biological clock, pardon the pun. In our hyper-sexed environment it makes sense to deduce that Viagra, et al, enables sexual perpetrators to prey on girls when they otherwise couldn’t.

3/12, 11:51a:

March 12 Quote of the Day

In order to investigate ways to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies we must examine the men who impregnate these women. Part of that examination needs to look at the other side of contraception, specifically male enhancements like Viagra….

With Pfizer claiming that they market specifically to men 44 years and older with erectile dysfunction, these statistics support the suggestion that men are buying Viagra as an enhancer instead of as a solution to erectile dysfunction.

So the question that needs to be posed is why are we making contraception more difficult for women to get when we are making things like Viagra more accessible to young men? Does anyone else see the relationship?

~ Huffington Post contributor Michealene Cristini Risley, in her March 11 piece, “The ‘abortion’ debate needs to include men who impregnate women”

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...