Pro-life news brief 9-27-12
by JivinJ, host of the blog, JivinJehoshaphat
- Kristin Neuhaus, a former abortionist and rubber-stamper for abortionist George Tiller owes $93,000 to the state board for her various attempts to keep her medical license.
- Speaking of Tiller and Neuhaus, the leader of a pro-abortion organization in Kansas with ties to Tiller has purchased his former clinic and aims to make it an abortion clinic again:
Burkhart declined to discuss the details of the sale, but property tax records available online list the appraised value of the property as $734,100. Burkhart said she can’t say yet exactly when the new clinic will open or how many doctors will work there….In a recent advertisement circulated by email to abortion-rights supporters, Trust Women said it was looking for medical staff experienced in first and early-second trimester abortions and planned to open its clinic between mid-November and January 2013.
- In Canada, there is much ado over Status of Women minister Rona Ambrose (pictured left) voting in favor of a motion to create a committee to research when life begins. At National Post, Jonathon Kay has the details:
Globe & Mail columnist Tabatha Southey Tweeted that “Status of Women Minister Rona Ambrose voted Yea on [motion] 312. Now waiting for the Minister of Agriculture to vote against corn.” Canadian poet Paul Vermeersch wondered aloud: “After Rona Ambrose votes in Parliament against all Canadian women, will Peter Kent napalm a family of peregrine falcons in solidarity?” And Gail Erlick Robinson, Director of the University Health Network’s Women’s Mental Health Program, has a letter to the National Post declaring that “As Minister for the Status of Women, [yea-voting] Rona Ambrose should be particularly ashamed.”Ashamed? For what? Voting her conscience on one of the most important bioethical issues facing humanity? For supporting some measure of parliamentary courage in remedying a legislative vacuum that has existed in this country since the Supreme Court of Canada struck down our abortion law a quarter century ago?
Pro-choice militants cast abortion restrictions — at any stage of gestation — as a form of female slavery. And, perversely, they do this despite the fact that sex-selective abortion is eradicating millions of females from the earth every year — including some right here in Canada. Might it not be within the ambit of the Status of Women Minister to investigate whether the extermination of so many girl fetuses — including those viable outside the womb — is consistent with Canadian values?
[Ambrose photo via National Post]
Sep.27, 2012 4:05 pm |
Blogs |
Jill Stanek is a nurse turned speaker, columnist and blogger, a national figure in the effort to protect both preborn and postborn innocent human life.
She voted “yea” in favor of basing laws on modern science and she should be ashamed? Which side is anti-science again?
Globe & Mail columnist Tabatha Southey Tweeted that “Status of Women Minister Rona Ambrose voted Yea on [motion] 312. Now waiting for the Minister of Agriculture to vote against corn.” Canadian poet Paul Vermeersch wondered aloud: “After Rona Ambrose votes in Parliament against all Canadian women, will Peter Kent napalm a family of peregrine falcons in solidarity?” And Gail Erlick Robinson, Director of the University Health Network’s Women’s Mental Health Program, has a letter to the National Post declaring that “As Minister for the Status of Women, [yea-voting] Rona Ambrose should be particularly ashamed.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIKPrwErF1I
I’m guessing that the conspiracy theorists are out in full force now, declaring that the prime minister in fact wants to ban abortion despite voting against this motion and every abortion restriction put in front of him (and pressuring his MPs to do the same)?
Feminists are often accused of leading girls and women to hate and fear men. Abortion shows they haven’t been very effective! If women were really afraid and hateful toward men, we would avoid male company and particularly avoid intimacy with men.
Wouldn’t there be fewer abortions if the radical feminist were effective in scaring women from men?
It’s a shame that with all the need for affordable, basic health care, a top priority for some people is opening an abortion clinic. Do we really need another one? Maybe Obama can cut the ribbon at the opening ceremony.
“It’s a shame that with all the need for affordable, basic health care, a top priority for some people is opening an abortion clinic. Do we really need another one?”
I guess more abortion clinics leads to less people needing healthcare in the future, so there’s that. [/sarcasm]
But in all seriousness, one of the many depressing things about the abortion industry is that it involves medical professionals using their skills to kill instead of to heal. As you point out, so many people need real healthcare, so why don’t they get working on that?
The anti-life morons are out in force in Canada. Nothing new there. Sad.
John says September 28, 2012 at 12:13 pm
“Four more years. Five million more women exercising their choices.” [to murder their pre-natal child].
Another $15,000,000,000,000.00 in debt!
$8 trillion of that debt was Reagan, Bush and Bush.
Bush 43’s pro-death Iraq endeavor was responsible for $2 trillion of it.
Actually, George, you’re full of it.
https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/403841_10150574503855560_866610824_n.jpg