Feminists urged to sharpen “talons of vengeance” to stop slew of pro-life bills
Ladies, the battle against anti-choice, anti-women, anti-cool white dudes has now reached critical mass: within mere hours of each other, both Texas and North Carolina have advanced bills to restrict state reproductive rights. Read along while you file your nails into talons of vengeance and feminism.
The Texas State Affairs Committee – the special session Governor Rick Perry called together after Senator Wendy Davis’ legendary filibuster – voted to approve HB 2, a heinous anti-abortion bill, on a party line vote. The bill is now sent to the full House for consideration next week; if approved, it will go through the same process in the Senate….
And because one repressive, regressive state isn’t enough, North Carolina’s state Senate advanced its own anti-abortion bill by 29 to 12…. What would [HB 695] do if passed? According to The Frisky:
“The bill would require that abortion providers be present for all abortions, regardless of whether the pregnancy termination is surgical (a surgery) or medical (pill form). Additionally, the bill would require clinics that provide abortions to have the same engineering standards as ambulatory surgical centers, which would require additional, expensive updates. Anti-abortion activists have been pushing for such bills around the country because they know clinics will be out of commission while seeking to meet the new requirements.”
~ Colette McIntyre at The Jane Dough, July 3
[Photo via The Jane Dough]
Jill Stanek is a nurse turned speaker, columnist and blogger, a national figure in the effort to protect both preborn and postborn innocent human life.
Two words: Kermit Gosnell
““The bill would require that abortion providers be present for all abortions, regardless of whether the pregnancy termination is surgical (a surgery) or medical (pill form). Additionally, the bill would require clinics that provide abortions to have the same engineering standards as ambulatory surgical centers”
No, not doctors! Not standards!
They aren’t even trying to spin the bill like it’s unreasonable. I guess they mentioned that it would require “additional, expensive updates” but that, on any reasonable reading, is the only drawback. Any normal, human reading of this would look at it and say “more time with teh doctor? Safer environments? Sounds like that’s worth more work and money.” It’s a really sad commentary on the state of feminism that they don’t even have to try anymore to spin these laws like they’re bad. “I’m outraged, you should be too!” That is, however, the level of the mindless group think that is so characteristic of feminism.
This is actually helping the pro life movement. Showing how radical Big Abortion is…they actually filibuster against a bill that says you cannot kill healthy babies past 20 weeks (5 mos.) pregnancy and that abortion centers must meet the standards required by other surgical treatment centers and the drs. must be qualified enough to have admitting privileges at hospitals within 30 miles of the cts. Remember this bill has an exception for the health of life of the mother and fetal anomalies of the baby…so this is truly elective abortion on healthy babies by healthy moms.
This they filibuster for, use mob rioting tactics to delay a democratic votes, pay supporters to assemble and hold up vulgar signs even using children and chant Hail Satan.
Pro lifers this is a gift. This is like when Bull O’Conner turned the water hoses on the black demonstrators. That shocked and pricked the conscience of those watching. And the MSM focuses on the dress and shoes of Wendy Davis herself a product of a crisis pregnancy and a teen mom due to her own crisis pregnancy.
You just cannot make this stuff up!! A gift I say!!!
I agree Susie!!
Show your true colors!! Call on your anger, your vengeance, your bitterness and hatred!!
Sharpen away I say!! File those talons razor sharp and see how they work against those wearing the full armor of God!!
This is a spiritual battle!!
Praying this week against the evil!!
We’ve come a long way, baby. You ain’t seen nothing yet.
And to think it’s not even really a true “Pro-Life” bill. As long as it’s before 20 weeks… you can kill the baby.
Keep it up, ‘ladies.’ That photo of Gerri that you all show girls as young as you can is now an image that works for OUR side of the argument. What are you fighting for, ‘ladies?’ Please scream long and loud about exactly what you want: no medical supervision, no safety, and no restrictions while you kill pain-capable babies that are perfectly healthy.
Edit correction It is Bull Connor…
”That is, however, the level of the mindless group think that is so characteristic of feminism.”
Of a certain brand of feminism. It’s important to remember that not all feminists are pro-choice, or even liberals. Although, admittedly the type of feminism you’re describing is the type that is the most predominant these days.
Yes, true JDC. I should make it clear that whenever I use the word feminism, I am talking about the sludge that grew out of the sexual revolt. I know many try and use the word to describe true feminism (which of course I agree that there is and ought to be such a thing) but IMO the word has been hijacked and ruined beyond repair. It is like the word “gay.” We will never be able to take it back and use it in the normal way.
I expanded on this in my post…
http://prolifeintn.blogspot.com/2013/07/wendy-davis-has-become-our-bull-connera.html
I still love GK Chesterton’s version: “Feminists, as the name implies, are opposed to anything feminine.”
Sharpen those nails, Angry Gals! Bring it on the bitchy!
Getting your harpy on, Colette?
After the ObamaCare Democratic slam-dunk take control of my body head tax BS – you can rage about “My Body-My Choice” until the sun burns out for all I care.
Vengeance belongs to the creator of life. He will repay for all the innocent life unjustly taken. Beware His wrath. he won’t put up with this evil much longer.
if you are pro-woman then you shouldn’t be pro-abortion. because you wouldn’t go against another woman, right? and approximately 50% of babies aborted are women…. just saying…
I love the part of the article that says feminazi’s are filing their nails into sharp pointy claws. I hope they can learn to regret their hateful stance on women.
I heard a really great term from a man who lost a child to an abortion years ago… He said he used to be pro-choice, but after looking at the CityOfAngels.Us site he is now pro-adoption. His reproductive freedom was stolen from him by women like these, and now he wants his voice back.
Funny…the only old white dudes I know in the abortion debate escort bawling young women into my local abortuary. Huh.
Noooo!!! Don’t tell me this bill would actually legally prohibit that a woman can sit on a toilet in a hotel room cramping, bleeding her guts out, barfing, expelling her unborn baby while someone from the abortuary talks to her on the phone, tells her not to call 911, tells her to unlock her hotel room while waiting for someone to show up and “don’t look don’t look in the toilet”. You’ve got to be kidding me!!! How dare they pass this law!!
The Jane Dough? More like the Jane D’oh!
Yeah, I know it was lame, but I couldn’t resist.
I have noticed that this is a small community: There aren’t very many folks who post to Jill’s blog. Which is unfortunate, given the excellence of news reporting and insight that is available here.
That said: There ain’t nobody posting to that feminazi blog what is Collette’s scratching post! Just some pro-lifers from here… and one pro-abort who has nothing but denial!
I’m afraid that we are all the credibility that Collette has right now.
“That said: There ain’t nobody posting to that feminazi blog what is Collette’s scratching post! Just some pro-lifers from here… and one pro-abort who has nothing but denial!”
Thanks for the tip, I went over there and really enjoyed seeing the pwnage!
LOL! ROFLMAO!!!!
Thanks for that, JDC!
LOL.
That was a funny thread!! Thanks Del, JDC and pharmer. :)
“Thanks Del, JDC and pharmer”
You’re very welcome. :)
I wandered over there to see you all’s comments (lol!) and left one of my own – couldn’t help it – and it was immediately flagged for moderation. What?? It had no links or anything else in it…any ideas?
[It was this bit that got my dander up: “Nothing “dies” when you have an abortion before the third trimester. Nothing, no one, nadda. Saying otherwise is like talking about magical rainbows and unicorns, and, I dunno, religion. It’s all idealistic and not based on scientific fact.” Picturing my two 13 week boys as I read this I just about went through the roof.]
Ah, I think I figured it out.
“Thanks for that, JDC!”
You’re very welcome as well, Del.
“I nabbed that analogy from my ethics 101 class in college.”
Yes, you did. Now go ask for a refund on those student loan payments…
“Ladies, the battle against . . . anti-cool white dudes has now reached critical mass”
Isn’t that racist and sexist and nerdist?
Still less restrictive than Sweden. Pro-choicers should spend more time counting their blessings (a terribly perverse way of referring to the status quo) than acting as if any of these new regulations are onerous. By most civilized countries standards, all of this stuff is just common sense. But pro-choice loons don’t want common sense, because they imagine that such sane things are dire concessions they can’t afford to make. It’s all about the battle against pro-lifers, to them — and of course the unborn are necessary collateral damage in the crossfire.
As are their fellow women suffering from P.A.S..
And the men struggling with lost fatherhood don’t seam to even make it on the radar.
43% of men with daughters, will have, or have, lost a grandchild to abortion.
rasquel, that is why I call the radical femimazis pro-abortion and pro-death not pro-choice. For them there is only one choice-a dead baby. In the womb or out of the womb if a woman wants a dead baby they want to guarantee she gets one. That’s why I believe their “idol” is Gosnell, his staff and the rest of the butchers, they bow at the altar of Molech-babies must be sacrificed at all cost. I don’t agree with everything Ann Coulter says but I think she got the title of her last book right (I think it was her last one) “Demonic”.
yep…. genuinely “pro-choice” enthusiasm would encourage viewing ultrasounds, full disclosure of adverse consequences, counseling about adoption and charitable assistance, encouraging boyfriends and grandparents to join the discussion, etc.
In other words, make the full menu of choices available so a pregnant woman feels fully informed, empowered and uncoerced.
That is truly trusting women to make a right choice (in a worldview where all choices are equally good).
The pro-aborts who fight against ultrasounds, waiting periods and CPS’s don’t trust women and they don’t want choice. They want abortion, more abortion, and more corporate profits for the abortion industry.
What gets me is that Missouri has had these laws on the books for years. (In the 1980s, there was a dangerous abortionist in Springfield who only had hospital privileges in Peru.)
Colette, Where has this doomsday scenario surfaced? Where is the rise in women dying from unsafe, do-it-yourself, illegal abortions because these quacks were put of business? Where are screaming news stories? Where is the uptick in childbirth deaths? If these laws were as heinous and repressive as you purport, we would have seen these negative outcomes by now.
Why don’t pro-choicers want clean clinics, knowledgeable staff, and a certain standard, since they claim to be so worried about women’s health? Every time you see something about regulations on abortion clinics, or rules, there’s a pro-choicer saying something’s wrong with that. It confuses me.
I love it how the page was hijacked by pro-lifers. The ignorance on the other side is embarrassing though!