Breaking news: Abortionist indicted on involuntary manslaughter
I received the following email this afternoon from Eileen Smith, mother of Laura Smith, who died at the hand of MA abortionist Rapin Osathanondh on September 13, 2007:
It is with great joy that I announce an indictment has been handed down by the Barnstable County District Atty’s Office Today for “involuntary manslaughter” on the dr. that killed Laura. Nothing can ever bring Laura back to us but today’s actions by the DA brings comfort in knowing that justice will prevail….
Many of you do not even know the great lengths this man went to, to cover up his actions and the lies he has told. I thank God in particular for the one employee who came forward and exposed him just by telling the truth. I am eternally grateful to her.
For detailed background on this story read my posts here and here.
Operation Rescue spoke further with Eileen today and reported this:
A Barnstable County Grand Jury issued an indictment today against abortionist Rapin Osathanondh for Involuntary Manslaughter in the death of 22-year old Laura Hope Smith. According to Smith’s mother, Eileen, efforts to cover up details of her daughter’s death came to light during the grand jury investigation.
Mrs. Smith told OR that a Sheriff’s Deputy in another county had provided Osathanondh and his abortion clinic staff with CPR training, then backdated the session to a date prior to Laura’s death, with the full knowledge that someone had recently died at the clinic. Osathanondh and his staff had been uncertified in CPR until that time….
Mrs. Smith has filed a complaint in Bristol County against the deputy.
Laura Smith had sought an abortion from Osathanondh on September 13, 2007, at his office, Women’s Health Center, in the Cape Cod town of Hyannis. Smith was placed under full anesthesia when only Osathanondh and a non-medical receptionist were present. When Smith suddenly stopped breathing, the receptionist phoned 911, but it was too late. Smith died later that day.
Five months later, in response to a complaint filed by Eileen Smith, Osathanondh relinquished his medical license to the MA Board of Registration in Medicine in the wake of pending disciplinary action and a criminal investigation. Osathanondh’s two abortion offices were closed….
Read a Cape Cod Times article here.
Jill Stanek is a nurse turned speaker, columnist and blogger, a national figure in the effort to protect both preborn and postborn innocent human life.
Amen and Amen!!!
Thank you, Lord!!
With judges being what they are in this part of the world,I doubt anything bad is going to happen to this guy.
I don’t know enough about the case to say whether Dr Osathanondh was at fault.
Unfortunately the system can be very arbitrary. I had a professor who was charged with a crime–I don’t remember what the charges were exactly but it was serious enough that he was at significant risk of going to prison–because he failed to diagnose early-stage spinal meningitis in the ER where he was on duty. The patient, who was a member of a hyper-rich family in her twenties, came in with mild flu-like symptoms, ill but not sick; he sent her home with a script for pain meds; and she died twenty-four hours later. Interviews with the jurors later showed unambiguously that his humble, likable manner had much more to do with his aquittal than the obvious fact that you can’t do a spinal tap on everyone who comes into the ER with mild flu-like symptoms; spinal taps carry risks too.
Question for RTLs: Suppose you knew the death wasn’t really his fault. Would you want him to be convicted of manslaughter anyway? Which is more important to you, preventing a miscarriage of justice or RTLism?
What is important to me is justice for Eileen and her daughter, Laura.
and Laura’s child too…..
What is Justice? If he didn’t commit a crime, then justice would be dismissal of the charges or a Not Guilty verdict, right?
You are right, Rosie. Thank you.
SoMG: 9:51: I don’t know enough about the case to say whether Dr Osathanondh was at fault…
I’m not a doctor, aren’t you? Is any doctor allowed to administer FULL anesthesia besides an anesthesiologist? He was uncertified in CPR. He backdated CPR training records. Isn’t that fraud? A patient died under these circumstances. There must at least be negligence here.
Question for RTLs: Suppose you knew the death wasn’t really his fault. Would you want him to be convicted of manslaughter anyway? Which is more important to you, preventing a miscarriage of justice or RTLism?
I would never promote a miscarriage of justice. Leave that to the attorneys. (Justice, that is.)
ONCE AGAIN, another seedy abortion doctor ignoring the laws, practicing dangerous medicine, supported by corrupt law enforcement, and another woman dead from “choice”.
If he wasn’t guilty, he wouldn’t have surrendered his license.
Kudos to the employee who stepped forwarded and exposed this creep. Hopefully she/he has washed her hands of the whole dirty industry as a result.
And of course, WHERE are the bleeding heart pro choicers now? Isn’t it the least bit curious how they never seem to rally around these beloved “doctors” when they get busted?
So much for loyalty to their “saviors”.
Another one bites the dust.
Abortion is itself a miscarriage of justice.
SoMG, you asked if we’d still want him prosecuted for manslaughter if he’d done nothing criminally culpable in Laura’s death. The answer, at least for me, is “No.”
Occasionally a woman will die when an abortion triggers an embolism. The embolism itself can be fatal, or it can trigger potentially fatal clotting problems. If this happens, and there’s no evidence that the abortionist did anything criminally negligent to cause the embolism — say, leaving her with an unsutured laceration that is inviting an embolism — then it’d be a matter for the civil courts to settle IF the woman’s family filed suit.
I hold up Curtis Boyd and his staff and their management of Vanessa Preston. They were prepared for an emergency, they implemented proper emergency protocols, and had it not been for then-unforseeable DIC, Vanessa likely would have survived. If you grant that he did the abortion in good faith, honestly believing that to do so was in the patient’s best interests, then you can fault neither Boyd nor his staff for Vanessa’s death. It’s one of those “all surgery has risks” cases where in spite of everybody’s best efforts, a patient dies.
The bulk of cases I’ve seen don’t fall into that category, though probably more of them fall into the garden-variety sloppy malpractice category than into the “Why haven’t they arrested this quack?” category.
Abortion is itself a miscarriage of justice.
Well like I say I don’t know enough to say. On the one hand, everyone no matter who has finite risk for sudden inexplicable cardiac arrest from anaesthesia, that is a rare side-effect. Plus some people get heart attacks DURING anaesthesia but not because of it. I read he used general anaesthesia, I wonder why. Also I read he was a total one-man outfit, just him and the receptionist. That doesn’t sound good. Also I’m pretty sure the Massachusetts State Medical Board doesn’t call you a risk to public safety without good reason.
This is difficult googling because most of the articles are more about the patient’s mother’s heroic quest for justice than the circumstances of her death. Some of the authors of these articles seem to think that prosecuting Osathanondh will somehow stop abortions, and openly link their conviction that he is guilty to their religious belief. Jurors will have to be screened very carefully.
I won’t be surprised if it turns out Dr. Osathanondh was practicing very bad medicine. In that case, weeding him out is good for abortion in the USA, not bad for it as RTLs seem to think.
Abortion is itself a miscarriage of justice.
Posted by: xalisae at July 16, 2008 11:16 PM
…………………….
What justice do you find in miscarriage? Who is being punished and why?
Xalisae, you wrote: “Abortion is itself a miscarriage of justice.”
LOL That’s what I meant by having to screen the jurors very carefully. I’m not a lawyer but I’d bet (if I were a betting man) thta if any juror expresses that attitude before during or after the trial, it’s a mistrial.
And Christina, it doesn’t have to be an embolism. It can be neurochemical.
SoMG,
you owe an apology to Jill if you have any decency.
Jasper: Decency is in the minus category for people who kill babies for a living, so don’t hold your breath.
Jasper, an apology for what?
Mike, there are corrupt plastic surgeons and corrupt heart surgeons and corrupt lawyers and farmers and teachers. There are going to be corrupt abortion doctors too. But it’s a lot easier for a corrupt abortion doctor to give all the others a bad name.
If this woman’s death was a mistake made in good faith, that’s one thing, like Christina said. However, they shouldn’t have falsified documents to cover it up. At the very least, an obstruction charge might be appropriate here.
SoMG,
You have a brilliant mind. You represent doctors all over the world. (Putting aside the fact that I don’t believe abortionists are practicing medicine, you still went through med school), you listen to Opera, something usually attributed to intelligent people, you are probably well off financially, (abortion is a lucrative business after all) and yet you lower yourself to the behavior of a 9 year old drawing dirty pictures of his English teacher…
There is a very angry, lonely little boy inside of you, and it really doesn’t matter that he is disguised by the facade of a gentlement.
The names that you’ve called Jill show such a great degree of immaturity, that all the white gloves and monocles in the world can’t disguise it.
You want us to view you as a legitimate physician, but to me, you’re just a brat, seeking attention, and not above lowering yourself to the most juvenile tactics to achieve it.
Do you view Jill as a surrogate mother figure? Is it easier to be ticked off at Jill, to call her names, to rail against her, than your own mom? You have some serious issues. Jill didn’t abort your siblings. Jill didn’t tell the world that you were a thorn in her side. If you’re pissed off at Jill, you should seriously examine why, and ask yourself if you’re not really ticked off at someone else, someone that intimidates you so much that you’ve spent your entire life, alternately seeking her attention and trying to stick it to her.
Relax. You told me yourself that your mom is proud of you. You don’t have to seek her approval anymore. Transferring your insecurities with her to Jill is not going to win your mothers love. From what you’ve told us of her, love isn’t one of her fortes. Give it up. Move on.
I’m not saying any of this to attack you. Honestly. But, sometimes you wear your insecurities on your sleeve, and I can’t just stand by and let you take out your frustrations on innocent bystanders.
If someone were to call you the kinds of names you called Jill, I’d stand up for you too.
I won’t be surprised if it turns out Dr. Osathanondh was practicing very bad medicine. In that case, weeding him out is good for abortion in the USA, not bad for it as RTLs seem to think.
Posted by: SoMG at July 16, 2008 11:17 PM
I thought LEGAL abortion was supposed to stop this kind of “back-alley” abortionist?
Yeah right – it just makes them LEGAL!
I doubt he will be convicted of anything especially if the trial draws a Judge who’s been involved in any way personally with abortion.
Do you view Jill as a surrogate mother figure? Is it easier to be ticked off at Jill, to call her names, to rail against her, than your own mom? You have some serious issues. Jill didn’t abort your siblings. Jill didn’t tell the world that you were a thorn in her side. If you’re pissed off at Jill, you should seriously examine why, and ask yourself if you’re not really ticked off at someone else, someone that intimidates you so much that you’ve spent your entire life, alternately seeking her attention and trying to stick it to her.
This is known as projection. Somg does this all the time. It’s a difficult thing to stop doing, by my understanding.
Patricia,
It just goes to show you how very powerful the bond between mother and child actually is. SoMG is a grown man, but is still trying win his mother’s love. And all of his relationships are colored by his failure to do so.
Of course, SoMG is the only one that doesn’t see it.
MK: Well when I was a LaLeche League leader years ago, we always would tell the moms that breastfeeding helps them to bond with their baby and meet their baby’s needs. And there are many studies that demonstrate that a child who does not get his/her needs met when young will forever try to have those needs met as an adult.
I think a great percentage of children grow up like this today. It’s pretty easy to spot these needy adults.
Patricia,
Exactly. I don’t mean to belittle SoMG. Whatever pain he is in is very real. But what is SO obvious to us, is completely invisible to him. He has no idea that his whole life seems to have been built around trying to gain proof that his mom loves him.
Granted I’m getting this from two very small pieces of information, (the fact that she had 4 abortions, and the fact that she is proud of SoMG for being an abortionist), but those are two very powerful bits of info.
SoMG becomes an abortionist to show his mom that he still loves her in spite of the fact that she killed his siblings (and possibly in gratitude that he wasn’t one of the ones she chose to eliminate) and his mother in turn is proud of him because by aborting children, he validates her choices, tells her that what she did was fine with him.
Except she knows the truth. And he knows the truth. And the whole relationship is built on lies. No one wins. If he becomes pro life, he betrays her. If she becomes pro life, she can no longer be proud of him…
What a waste of a brilliant mind. I just want to hug that “little lost boy” so badly…
Dont you think that this suggests that Somg is a woman? Most women try to get approval from their mothers, most men from their fathers. IMO.
What of SoMG’s Daddy?
Patricia,
I think it shows even more that SoMG is a man. The phrase Daddy’s little girl was coined for a reason.
I think girls spend their whole lives trying to get approval from their daddys. (Moms too, but in a different way…I think moms are more like rivals and equals, whereas dads are more like knights.) If the dad is lame, or missing, then girls spend their lives trying to replace him. If the dad is awesome, then girls marry well. They know what they are looking for.
I think the same relationship exists with boys and their moms. They want their dads respect and they want to respect their fathers, but the seek their mothers love. If they don’t get it, they have serious issues with women. If their dads are weak, or at least their mothers are the stronger of the personality, then I think that the boys grow up seeking strong women (who of course eat them alive) and being weak men themselves.
Of course NONE of this is written in stone. There are always exceptions, we always have free will, and once you see the pattern you are able to change it. It’s only when you are unaware that there is a problem that the past controls you.
You married a man that was a total loser, right? What was your father like?
Carla,
I could be way off, and am just playing armchair psych. now. It’s probably not fair to dissect SoMG like he was a bug, but if I had to guess, I’d say that SoMG’s dad was either weak or distanced himself in self defense from his wife. Probably worked long hours, or drank. Whatever it took to escape. Or maybe they divorced. I don’t know. But I’d be (if I were a betting woman) that he and SoMG weren’t very close.
The predominant emotion that I get from SoMG is loneliness. And of course arrogance, but to me, that is just false bravado. I’d be willing to say that SoMG probably does not have any deep or meaningful relationships. Maybe plenty of shallow friendships, but I’d bet (if I were a betting woman) that he doesn’t like to open himself up…makes him too vulnerable…so any relationships he does have, are probably very one sided or superficial. Which is sad, because he really does seem to have a lot to offer. If he’d just break free.
Regardless of if SoMG apologizes to Jill (for whatever he said) I doubt Jill is going to lose any sleep over it. She’s a tough cookie and realizes that this comes with the territory when you have a blog.
Why has this turned into a psych-analysis of SoMG?
Hitler liked opera as well…
Mike,
LOL…It digressed because SoMG used some very juvenile language to describe Jill and I found it striking that he hates her so much. And that a grown man that thinks of himself as a professional would stoop to such sophomoric antics.
He tries to come off as one of the elite, but betrays himself so often I just had to speak up…
Chicks. You know. Give em something to talk about and off we go…
Mike,
As to Hitler…you just illustrated my point. Look at his family. I think people like Hitler have so much bottled up emotions, that Opera appeals to them because it is a “safe” outlet for some of them…passion without the consequences. Emotion without the vulnerability.
“SoMG used some very juvenile language to describe Jill and I found it striking that he hates her so much. And that a grown man that thinks of himself as a professional would stoop to such sophomoric antics.”
————————————-
Looks like that proves SoMG is a guy. I think his hate for Jill is a projection of his response to his mom’s lack of attachment (love?) for him while growing up. He did mention that his prev 3 or 4 siblings were aborted by her mother.
I think that SoMG is a very intelligent and interesting individual, and I think trying to find the reasoning behind why he does what he does for a living should be important to everyone, just as trying to find the reason that women go in for abortions in the first place so those reasons can be eliminated should be paramount to our cause. No one to provide abortions and no one to want them is just another means to our end. And I’m honestly quite intrigued by someone who can be so informed in many respects, yet seemingly nearly devoid of any instruction in even the most rudimentary knowledge of basic concepts of right and wrong, with such grossly misplaced priorities I’m almost astonished by it. Kind of like Jess, but without the conscience or good intentions.
X,
Exactly. I really don’t mean to put him under a microscope just for the fun of it. But to understand the mind of an abortionist? That’s just too important.
I believe it is natural for people to choose life, to be repulsed by the idea of taking lives, so when I see people that think it’s a “right”, I figure something went wrong somewhere.
With some women that have abortions, it’s an understandable desire to to avoid something unpleasant. But why do these doctors do it? They can’t really believe they are helping. They are too smart for that. So, somewhere in their past, some wiring must have gotten crossed. Find that, and you might figure out how to fix it.
I don’t think I would be so obvious about it on a public forum, but the man has bragged about his mothers abortions like they are prizes. So if he’s willing to use this to shock us, then I’m willing to use it back…or as my 8 year old would say…He started it. lol.
Question for RTLs: Suppose you knew the death wasn’t really his fault. Would you want him to be convicted of manslaughter anyway? Which is more important to you, preventing a miscarriage of justice or RTLism?
Posted by: SoMG at July 16, 2008 9:51 PM
When you don’t follow basic medical guidelines like having qualified staff present, and then someone dies, you can’t say it is not your fault. If he had followed the correct procedures and she had died anyway, then you can try to make the case that he wasn’t at fault. However, he didn’t follow proper medical procedure, and a death resulted.
Also, the people who are coming forward are not RTLers, they are the victim’s mother and the doctor’s own staff.
The county isn’t trying to railroad an innocent man. There is sufficient evidence for a trial.
Let’s put the shoe on the other foot. If that doctor is convicted by a jury and say hypothetically you lived in that county, would you vote against the District Attorney in the next election just because his office prosecuted an abortion provider?
You married a man that was a total loser, right? What was your father like?
Posted by: mk at July 17, 2008 8:54 AM
MK: my situation is very different. I had and still have a wonderful relationship with my dad. In fact, it wasn’t until I got to know some of my adult girlfriends extremely well that I have realized just how lucky I have been and that my father has been a gift to me. My father took me to music lessons, figure skating practices, and we even spent a week together when I was doing field work for my B.Sc. We often went fishing together when I was a teen, I would go for walks with him during lunch hours that I worked at his office and he was the one who taught me how to properly throw a baseball and hit home runs in grade school [I was the smallest in the class and always picked last for teams ! :-(
He treated my mom like gold too.
My problem is that I married a someone with a ton of personal problems that were kept hidden, from a lousy family (which i didn’t understand would impact my marriage) and that I was a very innocent, trusting young woman. I grew up in a home with a lot of love and we just treated each other with respect. I didn’t realize this is not the case for many many people.
As for motives that Somg or any rabit proabort might have- look at Margaret Sanger. All she talked about was how her mother had pregnancy after pregnancy. Wonder what she felt about her dad?
There often seems to be some sort of “disorder” in relation to the opposite sex with these people.
Hippie, you wrote: “If that doctor is convicted by a jury and say hypothetically you lived in that county, would you vote against the District Attorney in the next election just because his office prosecuted an abortion provider?”
Of course not. It’s GOOD for pro-choice when bad abortion docs get weeded out. Ya know, just like it’s good for the RCC when child-molesters get weeded out.
Of course not. It’s GOOD for pro-choice when bad abortion docs get weeded out. Ya know, just like it’s good for the RCC when child-molesters get weeded out.
Posted by: SoMG at July 17, 2008 4:16 PM
For your info, there are more child molestors in the US public education system than there are in the RCC. Yet we hardly see any outcry over this abuse do we somg?
The point is LEGALIZATION of abortion was supposed to rid us of quack abortionist – but all it’s done is legalize the quacks since they are the only doctors who will do abortions. Ya know – the bottom of the barrel scenario.
Of course not. It’s GOOD for pro-choice when bad abortion docs get weeded out. Ya know, just like it’s good for the RCC when child-molesters get weeded out.
I agree. I think that’s one of nicer things you’ve ever said about the RCC. :)
I was also from a decent, traditional family, and innocent and trusting. I ended up falling for the first guy who seemed to show any interest in me once I got to college, and he was a user of women, with anger issues and lied a lot. Luckily, my “contraceptive attitude” and “permissiveness” towards sex allowed me to find out all these things about him BEFORE he and I ended up married with kids, and I certainly learned a valuable lesson. Every other man I dated thereafter, especially the one I am now happily married to with two children by, have been wonderful guys who very much love(d) and care(d) for me.
Patricia, you wrote: “For your info, there are more child molestors in the US public education system than there are in the RCC. Yet we hardly see any outcry over this abuse do we somg?”
Does the US public education system PROTECT child molesters in its midst, transferring them from one school to another as they get caught, and attempting to bribe or intimidate the victims and their families, the way the RCC protected its child-molesting priests for so long? I think the RCC’s long-term cover-up attempt had more to do with the outcry than the child-molesting itself.
You wrote: “The point is LEGALIZATION of abortion was supposed to rid us of quack abortionist…”
It was? You think legalizing something is supposed to get rid of all the bad practicioners? Well, practicing law is legal, so why are there bad lawyers? Bad surgeons? Bad insurance salesmen? Bad teachers? Could it be (gasp) that legalization is necessary but not by itself sufficient to get rid of all the bad practicioners?
You wrote:”… – but all it’s done is legalize the quacks since they are the only doctors who will do abortions. Ya know – the bottom of the barrel scenario.”
Oh yeah. Bottom of the barrel. Like this guy:
http://www.med.unc.edu/obgyn/falcultyBios/womensPrimaryHC/grimes.html
and this guy:
http://obgyn-nw.ucsf.edu/view_faculty.cfm?member=68
and this guy:
http://peacecorpsonline.org/messages/messages/467/2454.html
And this guy:
http://www.netsurgery.com/faculty_minibio.asp?f=contraception&d=hausknecht_richard
And this lady:
http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2008/01/11/four-abortion-myths-dispelled
In fact there is no evidence whatsoever that says that bad practicioners are any more common in abortion than in any other speciality or for that matter any other profession. The “bottom-of-the-barrel” scenario is a RTL myth.
What a waste of a brilliant mind. I just want to hug that “little lost boy” so badly…
Posted by: mk at July 17, 2008 8:06 AM
………………………
You and your parish priest mk.
What you fear is having a brilliant mind and wasting it. So you dumb yourself down to a level that is easy. Convenient even.
Better to play stupid rather than put your brain to use. It’s easier.
Your only claim to fame is giving birth. You will donate nothing else to the world and you wish that your ‘rare’ accomplishment should be special. Because?
You aren’t a shrink. You aren’t even honest about your own selfish agenda.
Sally: That last post is so completely INSANE it doesn’t even warrant commenting on, but I’m going to anyway.
You ridicule MK for giving birth and for having a selfish agenda. In case you haven’t noticed, MK takes her role as a mother very seriously. What is WRONG with that????? IF that is her “claim to fame” as you put it, so be it. PLENTY of other women have such “claims”.
WHERE is this so called “selfish agenda”???
If you call MK’s (and other pro-lifers’) efforts to make people see how wrong abortion is, and to try to understand the likes of SoMG, that hardly makes the “agenda” selfish.
MK never claimed to be a shrink. Where did THAT come from?
You wouldn’t know a brilliant mind if it knocked you in the face.
I was also from a decent, traditional family, and innocent and trusting. I ended up falling for the first guy who seemed to show any interest in me once I got to college, and he was a user of women, with anger issues and lied a lot. Luckily, my “contraceptive attitude” and “permissiveness” towards sex allowed me to find out all these things about him BEFORE he and I ended up married with kids, and I certainly learned a valuable lesson. Every other man I dated thereafter, especially the one I am now happily married to with two children by, have been wonderful guys who very much love(d) and care(d) for me.
Posted by: xalisae at July 17, 2008 6:23 PM
You were lucky xalisae but you also allowed this man to use you. IMO, that is what sex before marriage does. It was not the sex before marriage that helped you but that you were eventually able to see him for what he was. My ex was (and still is ) a master at hiding who he really is. He’s been pretending all his life. The signs were there for me, very subtle, nevertheless in hindsight, they were there. Also my mom saw through him but couldn’t make a good enough argument for me in my mind.
You wrote: “The point is LEGALIZATION of abortion was supposed to rid us of quack abortionist…”
It was? You think legalizing something is supposed to get rid of all the bad practicioners? Well, practicing law is legal, so why are there bad lawyers? Bad surgeons? Bad insurance salesmen? Bad teachers? Could it be (gasp) that legalization is necessary but not by itself sufficient to get rid of all the bad practicioners?
If you had ANY savvy at all (not to mention intellectual honesty here), you would have recognized that this WAS and IS the proabort liberal argument that was used to get abortion legalized.
My point was that is was always a sham argument which you obviously agree with! Thanks!! lol
Does the US public education system PROTECT child molesters in its midst, transferring them from one school to another as they get caught, and attempting to bribe or intimidate the victims and their families, the way the RCC protected its child-molesting priests for so long? I think the RCC’s long-term cover-up attempt had more to do with the outcry than the child-molesting itself.
You don’t think the US public school system is protecting these perpetrators, many of whom are women!?? It’s been noted that their sentences are very light. It’s also an ongoing problem which the system refuses to address.
BTW: don’t bother posting links to stuff for me. I don’t read them.
Sally,
You aren’t a shrink. You aren’t even honest about your own selfish agenda.
But I am hot.
mk: Lol!
Heck, this guy had GREAT credentials…
http://www.trutv.com/library/crime/serial_killers/history/mengele/4b.html
SoMG,
Your comment has been deleted. You know why.
MK,
Actually, you would make a good therapist/psychologist for people. I think you’d make a great teacher too.
What WOULDN’T mk be good at?
SoMG,
Per your deleted post…you and Sally should hook up.
You’re always gettin’ on our case for not reading properly.
For the last time…it’s 90 degrees, I have no air conditioning and I’m hot…
Bring that great mind of yours out of the gutter…do you know the sunshines up here where we live?
MK, for goodness’ sake, turn the air conditioner on.
MK, why no air conditioning?
Bobby:1:08: What WOULDN’T mk be good at?
Abortionist.
I had a fender bender today. Nobody hurt thank God, but I’m bummed!
MK: I am hot.
:: sneaking up behind MK and putting an electric heater under her computer chair ::
Janet, I’m very glad you’re okay, but that really does suck…. What a pain in the butt.
Doug, ha ha about the heater under the chair!
—————–
Thanks for the empathy! Yes, it’s a pain!!
Abortionist killer pleads “not guilty” of manslaughter
Laura Smith’s mom Eileen forwarded this video of yesterday’s court proceedings where a Cape Cod DA charged Laura’s abortionist Rapin Osathanondh with manslaughter for “willful, reckless conduct,” according to NECM.com, leading to her death: Read previo…