When John McCain brought up Barack Obama’s opposition to the IL Born Alive Infants Protection Act during last night’s presidential debate, Obama indignantly responded:

If it sounds incredible that I would vote to withhold lifesaving treatment from an infant, that’s because it’s not true.

obama smiling big.jpgSavvy strategy, and not the first time his side has used something close to this line. When National Right to Life first outted Obama in August as having voted against the identical version of Born Alive in IL that passed overwhelmingly on the federal level, Obama’s incensed campaign at first denied it all, saying in a written statement:

The suggestion that Obama – the proud father of 2 little girls – and others who opposed these bills supported infanticide is deeply offensive and insulting.

Is the too-crazy-to-be-true strategy of denial working? Maybe. Bearing in mind the following comes from an Obama aide via Byron York in National Review Online today, still…

[W]hen moderator Bob Schieffer of CBS asked whether either man could nominate to the Supreme Court a judicial candidate with whom he disagreed on Roe v. Wade. McCain used the question to disavow any litmus tests for judges, and then brought up Obama’s vote, in the IL state senate, against a born-alive protection bill.
Pro-lifers were undoubtedly happy to see McCain bring it up, but the Obama aide told me it wasn’t a problem. “When he made the attack on the born-alive legislation, you saw a vertical drop in the dial groups that was pretty astounding,” the aide said. “People didn’t find it credible.” There has been a lot of back-and-forth about what version of the born-alive bill was up for consideration, but you can make a pretty solid case that Obama did indeed do what McCain said he did. Nevertheless, if the aide’s account is correct, people didn’t buy it.

So here we may have a scenario of Obama supporting something so heinous people simply may not believe it.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...