Nyah nyah, Planned Parenthood didn’t want the money anyway
Planned Parenthood officials said they didn’t plan on taking the money anyway.
~ Nashville’s NewsChannel5.com, reporting June 10 on Planned Parenthood of Middle and East Tennessee’s response to the news it will not receive an anticipated $335,000 state grant for family planning services. The funds will instead be redirected to the country health department.
[Image via sodahead.com]
Jun.11, 2011 8:36 am |
Health care, Industry watch, Legislation inspirations |
Jill Stanek is a nurse turned speaker, columnist and blogger, a national figure in the effort to protect both preborn and postborn innocent human life.
Yeah, I’d probably turn down $335,000 in money too. NOT!
Yeah, right.
Glad to know it. Let’s hope the rest of America’s Planned Parenthood facilities feel the same way when their funding is stripped. ;)
Yeah, sure, I bet they weren’t going to take it. (sarcasm)
LOL they crack me up sometimes. Who believes this stuff coming from them?
HAAAAHAHAHAHAAAHAHA!!!!
PP will willingly give up taxpayer funding when pigs fly.
ah – now if they would only not plan to accept any taxpayer money at any other Planned Parenthood…. especially since they are getting so many donations! yes – when pigs fly!
I am delighted that public opinions seems to be turning against PP. I hope it will continue as more of their repugnant behavior is exposed. God bless all in Tennessee and elsewhere who are striving to bring that about. May I say, though, that I find the graphic above (lady with her tongue obscenely displayed) is inappropriate. We Pro Lifers do not indulge in one-up-manship or mocking behavior. Leave that to the pro-aborts. They are good at it!
Great photo!
Captures the essence of the superficial and transparently false pretenses of the PP whores.
CC,
I have made an unilateral decision to put the term ‘democRAT’ on inactive reserve and increase the playing time for the term ‘whore’.
There is such target rich environment these days what with PP being in the news so much lately.
Let’s trumpet that statement of theirs. They don’t need our tax dollars!
That chick’s tongue has got to go.
They definitely don’t need our money.
I would love to see that tax money go to education or adoption facilities.
I object to calling women “whores” though.
Yes, ken, of the two words, I definitely prefer you to shelve “whores”.
Calling women and even individuals who we disagree with, “whores” is not cool.
A whore is someone who does immoral things for money – if the shoe fits…
PP has the philosophy of ‘whore’. Comparing PP to a ‘whorehouse’ is a gross understatement.
[Forgive me I failed to publish my disclaimer: I use the term ‘whore’ in a non-gender specific sense, with apologies to traditional whores everywhere.]
Lori and Rachel,
I have given your kind suggestions some thought.
Just did a little research, the hebrew word zanah [2181] is found 93 times in the old testament in the KJ and is translated, whore, whoring, whorish, whores, whoredom, harlot, harlots, and harlot’s.
The Greek word porne [4204] is found 4 times in the new testament and is translated in the KJ harlot, whore. porne is a derivative of the Greek pornos [4205] which is found 8 times in the new testament and is translated in the KJV fronicator, fornicators, whoremonger, and whoremongers.
pornos is derived from pernemi (to sell; akin to the base of NT:4097); a (male) prostitute (as venal), i.e. (by analogy) a debauchee (libertine)
In both the old and new testament it is most often used in the figurative gender neutral sense to refer to spritual idlolotry.
I suppose many or most of the folks who associate themselves with PP may have never known the Great I AM or HIS SON, Jesus the Christ/Yeshua hamashiach and strictly speaking may not be guilty of leaving their first love and whoring after other gods.
But they are whoring after other gods just as many of us were before HE came looking for us and sought us out.
You find the both the word and the use of the word offensive and you should.
GOD knowlingly applied it to HIS wayward kids who traded a relationship with the Living God for things, objects, concepts, philosphies, that are void of life and are word and in deed anti-life.
GOD uses it accurately and appropirately.
I try to do the same with moderation.
Yeah sure, and the Queen of England carries my luggage.
If anyone believes this please contact me ASAP. I’ve got some great ocean front property in Montana to sell you.