Stanek Sunday funnies: “Joe just being Joe” edition
The one and only vice presidential debate of the 2012 election cycle was held this past week, and I’m sure Joe Biden’s inappropriate behavior has already been added to the historical list of “don’t do’s”…
While the Democrat base was “delight[ed]” by Biden’s performance, coming in the shadow of President Barack Obama’s abysmal showing, a CNN poll showed Paul Ryan “sailed” past Biden in the debate. Why? Observed Mary Kate Cary at usnews.com:
Biden’s constant interruptions, smirks, and eye-rolling grimaces backfired on a number of levels. First, he reminded the majority of people who don’t like Biden that they have good reason to feel that way. The split-screen image on television – and the 80 to 100 interruptions – really didn’t play well for Biden, especially with the women I’ve talked to today….
Second, he confirmed for voters the level of incivility in Washington under the current administration…. If the Democrats win, here comes more gridlock.
And while Biden may have helped disillusioned Democrats feel better about their candidate, last night’s debate did not change the trajectory of the race. Over the last week, the momentum in the president race shifted dramatically. Real Clear Politics moved five swing states that were leaning Obama into the “toss-up” column this week, and Romney closed the polling gap in 11 swing states. Ryan’s performance confirmed for independents that he can handle being vice president, but Biden’s rantings did nothing to get those independents to vote Democratic.
With that, on with the cartoons…
by Bob Gorrell at GoComics.com…
by Glenn McCoy at Townhall.com…
by Gary Varvel at Townhall.com…
by Chip Bok at Townhall.com…
by Michael Ramirez at Townhall.com…
Jill Stanek is a nurse turned speaker, columnist and blogger, a national figure in the effort to protect both preborn and postborn innocent human life.
HAHA!! Some good comics this week. Of course, the comics are not nearly as funny as the debate itself was.
The VP appeared very devilish!
I did not watch either of the first two debates. Just excerpts from some of the transcripts and a few video snippets.
I came across these clips from last nites SNL. Quality funny stuff.
Ryan vs Biden
http://www.nbc.com/saturday-night-live/video/vice-presidential-debate-cold-open/1420805
Ariana Huffington comments on the VP debate and vaginas
http://www.nbc.com/saturday-night-live/video/weekend-update-arianna-huffington-on-martha-raddatz/1420802
I love these! #4 is my favorite. :)
The verse in Proverbs assumes the other guy speaking is “wise”.
“The verse in Proverbs assumes the other guy speaking is “wise”.”
Wise is relative. Standing beside Biden, anyone looks wise.
JDC – True.
I’m glad I had the NFL network and some postseason baseball on. I watched about 14 seconds of the debate…told the Mrs. that I wasn’t in the mood to watch ‘Dumb and Dumber’ and turned on better TV.
ex:
If you wanted dumb and dumber that would have been Barack and Joe. I don’t see the basis for your disparagement of Ryan, though the whole country got to see the low class act of Biden. It was said afterwards that Biden is the face of today’s Democrat party. Hard to argue with that!
Hi JDC 3:01PM
LOLLLL. Brilliant.
Hi Jerry,
There is something about someone laughing like an idiot that makes you question their stability.
In retrospect I think Ryan did the right thing. When your opponent is determined to look and act like a buffoon, why stop him? What a windbag.
Sitting next to this clown, how could Ryan look like anything but the dignified statesman?
Explain to me again which one was supposed to be the calm, respectful elder statesman, and which was the wet-behind-the-ears, immature upstart?
I haven’t seen that much nervous, taunting condescending laughter since my playground days.
Jerry
Biden = Dumb
Ryan = Dumber
Romney = Dumbest
Obama is the only adult in the room these days quite frankly.
LOL. That’s almost funnier than these comics, Ex.
My favorite is #3.
Jerry says: October 14, 2012 at 3:36 pm
“It was said afterwards that Biden is the face of today’s Democrat party.”
Jerry,
I would say that Joe Biden has made himself the butt of the joke that is the democRAT party
and
his assinine behavior is a reflection of their mascot.
Ex-GOP,
I think even you are beginning to realize you’ll be left alone on the playground come November 7th.
Don’t mistake Obama’ sober as a judge performance for being grown-up. It’s his subconscious talking.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/liberalism-manic-depressive_654407.html
Left alone on the playground? The GOP will control the House, the Dems will control the Senate. POTUS is still up in the air. Anybody who thinks the white house race is over is full of wishful thinking.
Every time you think Ex-GOP is trying to be sensible, he says something that remands us that he’s really just a troll. Romney and Ryan are dumber than Biden? REALLY?!
For the record, NO ONE is dumber than Biden. Not even Obama.
Fine John – they are equally dumb.
For the life of me, I can’t figure out what most of Romney-Ryan plans are. I thought I understood what they wanted to do on taxes, but not anymore. Same for healthcare. You folks that criticized John Kerry for being a flip flopper – I don’t know how you embrace these guys. They have about 50 plans out there, and just pull out whatever one seems to fit best when they like.
I don’t blame Obama much for being quiet much of the debate – I don’t think he even knew who he was debating.
Hi EGV,
Obama didn’t know who he was debating? Gee, wasn’t it the altitude?
Obama was quiet because he couldn’t challenge Romney. If he had any command of any facts, he could have.
When has anyone ever really challenged Obama? The media is little more than a WH stenography pool. He rambles and babbles without his teleprompter. Face it, the guy was exposed for the empty suit he is.
Wasn’t Chris ”Tingles” Matthews a hoot post debate? Even his hair was spazzing.
Yeah, Mitt is such a flip-flopper.
Obama: Romney wants to lower taxes by $5 trillion.
Romney: No I don’t. I never said that.
Ex-GOP: What a flip-flop!
Obama: Actually you do want to lower taxes by $5 trillion.
Romney: Nope. Not going to happen.
Ex-GOP: Another Romney flip-flop? This guy is a chameleon!!
Obama: Gov. Romney is going to lower taxes by $5 trillion…
Romney: No matter how many times you say it, it’s not true.
Ex-GOP: ANOTHER flip-flop??? He is ALL OVER THE PLACE!!!
John – so is Romney going to lower taxes or not?
Well, Ex-GOP, Romney did say about a thousand times that he’s going to lower tax RATES but at the same time eliminate loopholes and write-offs, which would keep taxes about the same for the rich while lowering them for everyone else. I know the Idiot-in-Chief wasn’t able to comprehend that concept during the debate, but that doesn’t mean all Democrats are required to play dumb.
Excellent – let’s assess then – the numbers are certainly out there.
What rates will we have for let’s say, somebody more in the middle class (50K a year) and somebody making $500K – what will their rates be.
And what loopholes/write-offs are going away.
With those pieces of information, we can see what the net affect is.
@Ex-GOP
You might find this interesting. I’m sure no one else will.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-10-12/the-final-word-on-mitt-romney-s-tax-plan.html
mp – I’m sure that’s just liberal nonsense – here, stay with me on this thread – John L is about to give us everything we need.
So John – what deductions are going to be eliminated? Are we losing the home deductions for interest?
Or the child credits?
What is it? If rates and going down, but he’s going to offset to make it a complete break even, we should be able to assess that, right?
So John, what is it?
Well, Current-Democrat, IF YOU HAD ACTUALLY WATCHED THE DEBATE, you would have heard Romney say about a thousand times that he intended to sit down with both parties and flesh out the details of his plan, because if he dictates all the particulars of his plan BEFORE sitting down with both sides, it kind of defeats the whole concept of bipartisanship. But then, I wouldn’t expect an Obama voter to have any understanding of bipartisanship.
I think you and mp would benefit from, you know, actually listening to what Romney has to say before you tell us how stupid he is. Just a thought.
So how can ensure that he won’t be raising taxes for people if he can’t state the things he wants to change so people can do the math?
And does it defeat bipartisanship if he names what he wants to raise revenue with, yet he feels really comfortable saying that he wants to eliminate the estate tax, repeal AMT, cut the corporate tax rate to 25%.
So you’re telling me that it only defeats bipartisanship if he names how he’ll raise revenue, but it doesn’t defeat bipartisanship if he says how he’ll cut revenue?
And we’re supposed to just trust that in the end, Romney, who makes what, $14 million a year, has me and you in mind?
Would you give Obama that long of a leash of trust? Seriously?
I think you and mp would benefit from, you know, actually listening to what Romney has to say before you tell us how stupid he is. Just a thought.
It doesn’t matter. Romney’s “plan” is not a plan. It doesn’t pencil out.
It doesn’t matter what kind of “bipartisanship” he engages in.
So, feel free to sling all the crap you want about “not listening.” I not only listened, I analyzed his “plan.” It’s my business.
It doesn’t work as advertised.
It just boggles my mind how the same people who railed against “hope”, saying it was too vague, lacked specifics, and was feel good – are now just accepting a plan without details – so it isn’t a plan at all (as mp said).
You should see my tax plan John – nobody would pay more than $1 in taxes, the deficit would be gone by end of 2013, and it would gently rain kittens every Thursday morning.
mp – I’m sure that’s just liberal nonsense – here, stay with me on this thread – John L is about to give us everything we need.
Ex-GOP, I appreciate your invitation to participate–I guess–but I’m really not into mental masturbation.
Don’t consider that an insult, because it isn’t meant that way.
I saw your comment and thought that Barro’s piece would be of interest to you. He lays it all out–with source documents–quite nicely.
John Lewandowski says: October 14, 2012 at 8:09 pm “I know the Idiot-in-Chief wasn’t able to comprehend that concept during the debate, but that doesn’t mean all Democrats are required to play dumb.”
JL,
Don’t presume that any, or even all, democRATs are ‘playing’….dumb.
Somebody send a message to the that village in Kenya and tell them they can cancel the ‘Amber Alert’. We have their idiot. We will pay them to take b o back.
… and it would gently rain kittens every Thursday morning.
Maine coons, I hope. They’re my favorite.
mp – I threw that comment about the liberal nonsense to tease – whenever I go to this site, I have to put on my crazy hat.
I only like polls if they favor my guy – otherwise, it is nonsense.
If a newspaper or media outlet doesn’t talk about something that I think they should, they are just biased, and though everybody on this board seems to get their news from wherever they want, evidently, the rest of the world is too stupid to choose their news sources, so the conservatives should get more of a say in what other people watch.
You know the drill. It was a fascinating piece. Quite frankly, I don’t mind the new, post etch-a-sketch Romney – he’s quite the moderate again.
EX-RINO,
I for one am not gullible enough to believe the obamateur would follow thru on a plan if he even had one.
Or has Stephen Colbert put it…if the obamateur wins-I hope he keeps some of the promises he didn’t keep the first time.”
I am not voting for Romney….I am voting against the obamateur.
You are a victim of mass hopenosis, scurrying to and fro pre-occupied with arranging the deck chairs on a sinking ship that is listing precipitously to the left.
Ken – voting doesn’t work that way. There’s no option that says “none of the above”, or “not x”.
You put your name next to a person.
You are voting for Romney…you own him and his plans (or lack of plans).
EX-RINO says: October 14, 2012 at 9:26 pm
“You are voting for Romney…you own him and his plans (or lack of plans).”
EX-RINO,
If that is your rule….When can we expect to see a photo of you sporting that obamateur logo tatoo on the center or your forehead?
Have you raised your hand in salute and taken the obama pledge?
Surely you don’t accept responsibility for all the obamateurs schemes. Surely there is something b o has done with which you disagree.
“It just boggles my mind how the same people who railed against “hope”, saying it was too vague, lacked specifics, and was feel good – are now just accepting a plan without details – so it isn’t a plan at all (as mp said). ”
Yeah that’s pretty funny. What’s also pretty funny is that the exact same people who bashed the crap out of Romney when he was running against their personal fave in the primaries are talking like he is some kind of awesome example of the ideal GOP politician. If I had listened to a lot of Republicans a few months ago, I would have the impression that Romney was practically a Democrat! Now he is just great lol.
Doesn’t apply to the people who admit they are just voting Romney because they want Obama out, or people who liked Romney before. I actually understand those positions a lot more than the 180 degree turn around people.
Ken – yes – there are many things I disagree with – but don’t give me this BS of “well, I’m voting for Romney, but I’m just going to sit back and hurl stones at the other side, and when stones are hurled at me, I’ll just say that I’m voting for the lesser of two evils”.
It’s a cop out buddy.
First of all I am not in the business of returning insult for insult, eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth.
You will have to search stringently to find examples where I have bragged on ‘republicans’. I suspect you will find more examples of my criticism of them.
I will leave it up to republicans to defend republicans.
I attack stupidity and the democRATs are a target rich opportunity.
There is one issue that is first and foremost in my consideration when I determine for whom I will vote.
There is no equivalency between Romney’s track record on abortion and the obamateur’s. Infanticidie trumps rape/incest/ and life of the mother exceptions.
Romney has no known history of being a dope smoking, on the down low, muslim/liberation theology embracing, same sex marriage endorsing marxist/humanist.
Just because you feel obligated to do a comprehensive comparative anlysis of ‘plans’ that have no historical probability of being implemented in toto, does obligate me to do the same.
But if that kind of bean counting butters your biscuit then keep on polishing the brass and pay no attention to the democRATs who are abandoning ship.
mp and Ex-RINO,
1)Is Oblama responsible for the over 5 trillion dollars in deficit spending during his presidency so far?
2) What would you say is Oblama’s biggest failure during his presidency up to this point?
Sheesh, after watching zombies for a few hours, here we are again with Obama zombies.
Look, you settled for the “hope” of a “change” that promised no more than doubling down on our debt and punishing the wealthy with the threat of a drop-in-the-bucket tax grab. And all it did was keep the economy stalled.
We have a new “hope” of experienced people, not academic chatterers, being in charge. People who know the economy is not a set-in-stone zero-sum game, but something that can be nourished and encouraged to grow.
That’s change we can believe in. You two can continue pointing fingers and laughing like Biden. We’ll see who has the last laugh.
Mary:
You are spot on. Sitting next to the laughing hyena would make even an empty chair look statesmanlike. But Ryan’s class and patient endurance of the buffonish character opposite him on the split screen was a mark of a serious and considerate leader, one who is even able to suffer fools without descending to that level of childishness. Ryan showed the voters of the United States he is ready for the big time.
It had to be a real trial for non-Catholics to see the different attitudes exhibited by the candidates towards their faith. It was painful for me as a Catholic. I hope you have seen the statement issued by the Catholic Bishops that destroyed the statement by Biden re the HHS mandate. I wish that they had taken Joe on about the assinine “personally opposed” fig leaf he used in an attempt to justifiy his unjustifiable position on abortion. Maybe that will come later. Ryan was positively brilliant on the matter.
With Romney and Ryan running for the highest offices in the land we at last have intelligent and competent candidates to vote for. True, they are not perfect, but no one ever is. One thing though is certain….once Romeny takes over, like him or not, everyone (and most importantly this includes leaders in the rest of the world) will know that at last we have adult supervision in charge.
@Ex-GOP
Here’s something else that may be of interest to you. Every economic recovery in the world right now looks exactly the same.
Maybe Romney and Ryan have a fix for that.
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/10/every-economic-recovery-in-the-world-looks-the-exact-same-and-that-stinks/263419/
Good grief. EG, if you hadn’t jumped the shark before, putting Biden above Ryan and Romney is insane.
I mean . . . dude.
Is the false flag losing his cool and tipping his hand?
Are you secretly the chairman of PP’s board of directors? Or what?
mp,
I suspect that’s mostly because we’ve abdicated our role of leading the world “forward”. Instead we flop around in the mudhole. Any way to make the buck stop in the Oval Office, or is it just a coincidence we have such a rare non-recovery recovery now?
“Sheesh, after watching zombies for a few hours, here we are again with Obama zombies.”
Did you watch Walking Dead? Don’t you dare spoil it for me Hans, I don’t have cable anymore so I have to wait for it to come out on Netflix.
Here’s something else that may be of interest to you. Every economic recovery in the world right now looks exactly the same.
Maybe Romney and Ryan have a fix for that.
mp, the rest of the world is WORSE off cause they have been taking the ‘Obamaroad’ of socializing and it is failing. That is why I can’t see why anybody with even a modicum of economic sense could advocate four more years of Obama. And the fix is to STOP doing what they did. Repeal socialized medicine and change Medicare for future citizens before it becomes in debt twice or more of our countries GDP like it is all over Europe already. WTH, give Obama another four years and he will start a new position at the UN to oversee a new world order where the US bails out Europe’s socialized debt behemoth too. Honestly I find it hard to believe people are that ignorant as to vote for Oblama.
mp and Ex-RINO,
I really don’t expect you answer my 10:35 post. Cause you probably feel the same way Oblama does….that he hasn’t done anything wrong but he could have done some things better right?…….freaking lol
fyi Jack, Walking Dead is already available on project free tv if you got time yet tonight to watch it.
Thanks truth, I didn’t know about that site. Bye guys gonna watch zombies die now lol.
rasqual, he works for a company that is making money hand over fist because of Obamacare so his over-riding polictical goal is to stop the repeal of Obamacare. Obama funding the largest abortion provider in the US with millions of our tax dollars doesn’t even register in Ex-RINO’s ostrich-like mind.
Ken – great – so you don’t speak for anybody – that makes it easy for us to both move on.
Jack, not all the links are live yet but the 180upload link is working now
truth – you owe me an answer to my medicare question on the thread we had going on for quite a while…so don’t go yelling and screaming about not getting your questions answered.
rasqual – let me assure you that truth is flat out lying, and knows it. My company is in health care and deals with the military. Nothing to do with health care reform.
Truth knows this, and is flat out lying, which is a shame.
I don’t know anything for sure Ex-RINO. How can I know what to believe when you call yourself pro-life and say you think abortion is murder but you still vote for most pro-abort politician in the US for president? When it comes to compromising ones principles to such a degree the most likely reason I can think of is money.
EG: I don’t have a horse in your race with truthseeker. I just don’t think you’re any kind of genuine article at all. I think you’re someone else manufacturing an impression in this forum. I also think you’re insane for keeping it up, since your role merely showcases the dedication of people here, without compromising it in the least.
As for whether a company can profit from health care reform without “having anything to do with” health care reform, that’s a non sequitur.
rasqual, my first instinct was that he worked for the Obama campaign and was sent here to take Jill’s threads off topic and post pro-Obama bs cause Jill’s first-hand knowledge of Obama’s votes against protecting aborted infants who were born-alive.
I don’t know anything for sure Ex-RINO.
Truthseeker? You’re a real piece of work. I specifically remember Ex-GOP talking about what he does for a living and you were on that thread as well, so don’t plead ignorance.
You told Rasqual ” … he works for a company that is making money hand over fist because of Obamacare,” then you doubled-down on that lie when you said, ” … so his over-riding polictical goal is to stop the repeal of Obamacare.”
More accusations of Ex’s shilling? Haha, this is always great. If you guys really think he has some ulterior weird motive you should ignore him, not have 100 comment long arguments with him.
Back to zombies.
It’s time for the 6:00 AM London cut.
Ex-GOP, have a good evening.
No, truth, he’d not be an Obamabot. He IS an Obamabot, but that’s incidental.
Just an enthusiastic pro-abortion false flag. Probably motivated for entirely private reasons, actually.
There’s a flow-chart logic to false flags. It’s an art and a craft. The distance between their two points of interest is not a straight line — but it is a logical one. Except that funny things sometimes happen on the way to where they imagine they’re going. They find that not everyone follows their script.
Supplementally, for the benefit of Jack and anyone else who might be amused at these charges of “false flag” posting on EG’s part — I’ve states my reasons for suspecting this before. Suspicion comes to certainty because EG is not stupid — and yet October 14, 2012 at 4:57 pm is as idiotic as it gets. False flag’s faux pas.
rasqual; is that any stupider then saying you think abortion is murder but voting for Obama?
Rasqual – I think the oddest thing is that we have this conversation about monthly. You chase me around, pull something off topic by yelling this false flag stuff – and NUMEROUS times, I’d laid out for you my beliefs and why I’m here. I don’t get it.
Quite frankly, your blessing on this board, or of my genuine appearance (or lack of), really couldn’t mean less to me. Do you need me to explain AGAIN my background and why I’m here? Do you simply just skip over any post that doesn’t fit your little worldview and pretend they never exist? What is your beef?
truth – I’ll tell you something that is stupider. Being somebody who has been told something who ignores what they’ve been told, and they goes about pretending they’ve never heard it.
Or maybe that is stupider, it is simply more evil.
Yeah, I’ll go with evil.
Rasqual/Truth -
This has been a good conversation though, and I feel like you two are rushing in and trying to sabotage the conversation to rescue something. So let’s get it back on conversation.
Let’s go back to Romney’s tax plan – he states he’s going to cut everybody’s taxe rates, but not actually decrease taxes for the rich because he’ll close some loopholes. How do you feel about this plan? Do you believe Romney?
EG: I have to decide which I’m going to believe, EG — your explanations of “why you’re here” (or whatever), or, on the other hand, the undeniable evidence of stupidity as in the post I cited on the relative intelligence of the candidates (absent Obama who, obviously, you place atop ’em all).
That post is just so stupid that I conclude no person on these boards could be sincere about it. It must, therefore, be a careless calculation by a false flag. Again — because no one could possibly be that stupid.
Ergo, I’m being charitable in deeming you a false flag, and not a moron. You really should appreciate that, right? I mean, I’m alleging that you merely made a tactical misstep as a charlatan. Being a charlatan may be ignoble, but erring as one is among the common failings of all people; you’re merely human — easily forgiven.
But to actually believe what you posted — to be a genuine believer of what you said — that’s just unthinkable. Which is why I don’t think it’s real.
Erring charlatan versus moron — I respect you too much to go with the latter. Not because I know you and wish to regard you well. Merely because, statistically, it seems ridiculously improbable that someone that stupid would show up here. I mean, they wouldn’t know how to use a browser, among other things. So in respect, I actively refuse to assign to you such a highly improbable status (moron) out of some desire to make you look as bad as I possibly can. That would just be grossly unfair.
So erring charlatan it is.
Ex-RINO says October 14, 2012 at 11:21 pm
“Ken – great – so you don’t speak for anybody – that makes it easy for us to both move on.”
EX-RINO,
Excuse me, but I have never claimed to be a voice for anyone but myself and the ‘voiceless’ pre-natal child.
[If you listen close and you know HIS voice, you can hear HIS HIM when HE allows me to speak for HIM, but I don’t end the sentence with, “Thus sayeth the LORD.” HIS sheep do not need my help to recognize HIS voice. It is written HE once spoke thru an ass, so I guess I meet the minimum qualifications.]
By ‘move on’ do you mean ‘lean forward,’ which is really just progressive speak for ’bend over, grab your ankles, grit your teeth and be prepared to squeal like a pig’.
rasqual -
For your incredible grasp of the English language, you don’t have a very good grasp on fact and opinion.
I believer, me personally, EGV as an individual…I believe that the most mature and most grown-up of the four is Obama. Biden is off his rocker. Romney is a serial liar. Ryan has grand ideas that he doesn’t think through all the way.
So me,EGV, as an individual, holds that opinion.
Now, you seem to think that I’m denying some fact. I’m not. There are millions of people who would agree with me, just like there are millions that would not agree with me. So why you are so shocked about it is beyond my understanding.
Again though, I’ve explained this all before. This whole thing about you “not getting me” – I, quite frankly, don’t give a tiny rat’s behind. You can be perplexed all you want. I can give you the explanation for the 5th time. As long as we can avoid this weird “false flag” post every other week.
EGV,
You call Romney a serial liar. Proof please…..not generalizations of changing positions but proof of lies.
mp,
You must have missed this part: “When it comes to compromising ones principles to such a degree the most likely reason I can think of is money.”
Now mp and Ex-RINO, if either of you has the ability to be honest you can answer these questions:
1)Is Oblama responsible for the over 5 trillion dollars in deficit spending during his presidency so far?
2) What would you say is Oblama’s biggest failure during his presidency up to this point?
RG “Now, you seem to think that I’m denying some fact. I’m not. There are millions of people who would agree with me, just like there are millions that would not agree with me. So why you are so shocked about it is beyond my understanding.”
Why would I be shocked? Fifty million Americans have IQs under 85.
I happen to believe yours is not under 100.
So you can’t be serious. And yet you’re earnest. Therefore, you’re dissembling.
And of course a false flag wouldn’t give a rat’s ass. That would be stupid. ;-)
Truth – okay – let’s take all this one at a time.
In the debate, Romney stated that pre-existing conditions were covered in his plan.
His own staff had to put out a correction that Romney wasn’t correct.
Do you agree that this a lie?
Jack,
The only spoiler I would give you is that a whole lot of the Dead get dead again. Speaking of which, look up on your Netflix the movie Dead Again. It’s one of the first ones directed by Peter Jackson of Lord of the Rings fame.
It’s a laugh riot! (That’s a feeble attempt to circle back to this post’s topic! :) )
ex:
I cannot sit idly by and ignore the question of Obama’s alleged intelligence. You certainly are entitled to your opinion, but I submit that the question is irrelevant. The point is that Obama is a monster, a man who as a state senator in Illinois worked feverishly to insure no legislation would get past him that would allow medical care for infants born alive in an attempted abortion. You cannot come up with anything that Romney or Ryan have done that sinks to the level of Obama’s depravity.
Anyone who professes pro-life sensibilities cannot possibly vote for this man.
The irony is we are here writing on this blog due to Obama’s hardness of heart. Jill Stanek might still be a nurse at Christ Hospital….and I think by now you know the rest of the story.
Actually, Obama’s pretty stupid. Well, ignorant, anyway. Every time he helped direct money when he had the chance as a community organizer, the results were abysmal. Totally trendy leftist — but abysmal. Such is the history of progressive do-gooderism in Chicago, though.
To cite just one example, his collaboration with Bill Ayers in education. This was Obama’s sole executive experience — and yet he has never cited it nor taken credit for its successes — because there were none. His first chance to blow $100 million was the principal “success.”
And then there’s Obama’s lying about contraception.
It’d be fun if Romney kicked his ass about that tonight.
The first ‘super-intelligent’ person ever to refuse to show his transcripts from high-school and college…lol
Again, Rasqual – you are having issues with fact and opinion. You can post a billion articles and that wouldn’t sway the fact that many people will simply find Obama more adult-like and intelligent- just like if I started firing articles about Romney’s failures, I’m sure that wouldn’t sway you.
So can you at least state for the record that you have no intention of talking about what you dragged us off of – which is Romney’s tax “plan” with a bunch of promises and no specifics? I feel sometimes that you have a batman button at your house – when others have found themselves backed into a corner, they press it, and you come and rescue them by taking things off topic.
Ex-RINO, you don’t expect me to take your word for any supposed lies do you. Link to the supposed ‘lie’ (a quote or a video of it) and to the particular Romney campaign response so I look it up I may find a different pundit who describes it differently. With your description of him being a serial liar you should have no problem posting these hundreds of these lies right?
rasqual says October 16, 2012 at 8:05 am
“Every time he helped direct money when he had the chance as a community organizer, the results were abysmal.”
rasqual,
You are defining sucess/failure by your understanding. the obamateur is using a completely different lexicon derrived from a completely different world view than yours.
Spending millions of other peoples money to further dis-able an already dysfunctional population and not co-incidentally promote his own name would be deemed a success by the obamateur’s metric.
Just look at what b o and his fellow democrats have done with the annual deficit and national debt. Re-distribution is not their primary goal.
The primary goal is to fundamentally change the american system and transform it into a humanist hell hole where ony the more equals enjoy the good life and every body else is equally miserable.
Truth – again, I’m not dodging your last question – just taking these one by one.
Here’s a link with what Romney said in Denver:
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/oct/05/mitt-romney/mitt-romney-says-his-health-care-plan-covers-pre-e/
“Pre-existing conditions are covered under my plan,”
Here is the information where his campaign says that pre-existing conditions would work as they did pre health care reform:
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/316367/re-romney-and-obamacare-katrina-trinko