Planned Parenthood audaciously hosts “Born After Roe” events
Last night Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota held a “Born After Roe Advocacy Salon” on the topic of the Supreme Court’s Hobby Lobby decision.
As near as I can tell, this is the fifth “Born After Roe” event this affiliate has held, aimed at “Planned Parenthood’s Next Generation.”
It has gone so far as to create a #bornafterroe Twitter hashtag, a dare to pro-life tweeters, really.
Planned Parenthood’s audacity is, of course, breathtaking to pro-lifers, who know it as the United States’ largest abortion provider, which has now profited from killing at least six million of the “next generation… born after Roe.”
Yet this attempt to woo those who it failed to murder before they were born exposes the abortion industry’s desperation to surmount its biggest problem: a youth replacement dearth.
Abortion advocates have at least two obstacles in this regard.
Abortion attrition
First, they have already killed many of those who would have had a natural affinity to carry the torch – children born to like-minded parent(s). As ABC reported in “The political fertility gap” in 2006:
“The political right is having a lot more kids than the political left,” Syracuse University professor Arthur Brooks says. “The gap is actually 41%.”…
Studying numbers from the General Social Survey – a government survey of social trends – Brooks found that 100 unrelated liberal adults have 147 children, while 100 unrelated conservatives have 208 kids.
That makes a difference, Brooks says, because “80 percent of people that express a political party preference are voting like their folks.”
Hence, more Republicans….
Nevertheless, conservatives such as pollster Kellyanne Conway relished this theory about depleted Democrats.
“They’re for abortion policy, they’re for same-sex marriage, they’re for many of the agenda items that eventually mean you probably don’t have children in the household,” Conway said.
Similarly, a paper entitled, “Demographic Determinants of Trends in Public Opinion about Abortion in the United States,” prepared for the Population Association of America in 2012, found the fertility gap to be 27% when analyzing GSS statistics from 1976-2010 specifically on abortion supporters vs. abortion opponents.
It’s all so obvious.
Paying Planned Parenthood to kill *and* abuse
The second problem Planned Parenthood, et al, face is trying to entice supporters they once tried to murder.
Only the truly ignorant would agree to befriend the same people who stood ready and willing to accept payment to kill them. And I mean “ignorant” in the best sense of the word – those who haven’t thought it through.
One reason ignorant youth haven’t thought it through is because the abortion industry has tried to throw the scent off the trail by (often successfully) enticing them to trade cheap, promiscuous sex for the real deal.
Then they offer a variety of pre-conceptive and post-conceptive fixes for mistakes, up to the ultimate, abortion – all of which they profit from. Talk about audacious. They’re asking kids to not only love the paid assassins who missed them but pay the same people to now hurt them.
The pro-life movement’s job is not only to stop abortion but attempt to correct the destructive sexual behavior that leads to abortion.
Jill Stanek is a nurse turned speaker, columnist and blogger, a national figure in the effort to protect both preborn and postborn innocent human life.
I was born after Roe and I’m not buying PP’s fake concern for me. I am proud to be part of the pro-life generation!!
Doesn’t this “born after Roe” theme play right into “Roe v. Wade Survivors” message of Students For Life and other young pro-life groups?
How about #borninspiteofroe
I was born fifteen years after Roe and was nearly aborted, so here’s a big ol’ “screw you” to the people who nearly assisted in my death.
And anyway, recent studies are showing my generation and lower are liberal in attitudes towards things like homosexuality and such, but are leaning more pro-life than previous generations. Huh, wonder why.
The elitists who decide what “liberal” and “conservative” mean are trying to lump abortion in with all the rest of the sexual license issues. And that makes sense, to a point.
But abortion means killing. And those who are opposed to military actions and capital punishment and even animal testing/cruelty have a natural affinity toward affirming human life in the womb. Awareness of this is not lost on most young “liberals” who are thinking for themselves.
If there is one issue that liberals and conservatives ought to agree on, it is the need to protect innocent life.
Watching the Culture of Death die off is not a good win for the Culture of Life.
It means we failed to turn people’s hearts before they killed their children.
I believe it’s not all “dying off” Del. You got a lot of the “liberal other than abortion” kids coming from pro-choice households. The birth rate difference between conservatives and liberals isn’t solely due to abortions (because self-identified conservatives and Christians do have abortions, whether people like to admit it or not), it’s also due to education level, contraceptive use, lack of religious reasons to have many children, delaying of child-bearing for careers, etc. The young people now even raised in pro-choice households are going pro-life at greater rights, even though they stay lib and Dem.
I remember watching some show while Obama was running for president. The guy was walking up to random kids at the college asking about politics. He asked one girl “How do you feel about Roe v Wade”? She replied “Uuum isnt that some dispute over land”? These were the ppl voting.
But on another note I was born pre roe. Im sure the world is missing a lot of wonderful people and its tragic. Genocide happening every day and most turn a blind eye. Had I had PC parents maybe I would have grown up believing a clump of cells lie. Killing children today is like ordering up a sandwhich today. The clinics boast of your comfort. Sedation..wearing an I Pod so you may listen to music or a silent suction machine..never mind your child being ripped to shreds.
Heck if you click on Preterm ( the clinic that just killed Lakisha Wilson during her abortion ) they take you on an on line facility tour.
“But abortion means killing. And those who are opposed to military actions and capital punishment and even animal testing/cruelty have a natural affinity toward affirming human life in the womb. Awareness of this is not lost on most young “liberals” who are thinking for themselves.”
This is a good point, and why I feel more identified with the younger libs who are anti-abortion rather than y’all old guard pro-lifers (lol ;) ). I see killing humans through war, death penalty, bad environmental regs, horrible labor laws, etc, and killing animals through eating them and torturing them with animal testing and such as under the same umbrella as being anti-abortion. I’ve never seen the sense in picking and choosing what life to protect or not. It’s all life to me (except self-defense, unfortunately sometimes that needs to happen).
Not to keep harping but the official cause of Lakisha Wilson…Uterine Atony caused by an elective intrauterine abortion. She leaves behind a 2 year old son.
Aaaagh i hate being distracted. Someone was talking to me. Above post..cause of death abortion!!
“And those who are opposed to military actions and capital punishment and even animal testing/cruelty have a natural affinity toward affirming human life in the womb” – and yet so many anti-choicers are pro capital punishment. Hm.
“The political right is having a lot more kids than the political left,” – in 2006. How’s that birthrate and change in voting trend for the Latino community going?
“That makes a difference, Brooks says, because “80 percent of people that express a political party preference are voting like their folks.” – oh well, at least 20% are becoming enlightened.
“Hence, more Republicans….” – republicans have abortions too.
“They’re for abortion policy, they’re for same-sex marriage, they’re for many of the agenda items that eventually mean you probably don’t have children in the household,” – I’d love to hear how allowing same-sex marriage changes the birthrate. It may actually increase it because they seek to adopt.
“The second problem Planned Parenthood, et al, face is trying to entice supporters they once tried to murder” – except they didn’t do any such thing. Talk about reaching!
“Only the truly ignorant would agree to befriend the same people who stood ready and willing to accept payment to kill them. And I mean “ignorant” in the best sense of the word – those who haven’t thought it through” – I think you’ll find they have and find the claim meaningless. They find the fact that they can avail themselves of choice to be more important.
Well Deluded, I also want to protect all life but I see some liberal viewpoints actually take life not protect it. I am against NEEDLESS war. I am all for war if someone is invading you and trying to attack your country. War for oil or whatever? Nope.
animals are not people. So no problems there. Sorry. An ant does not have the same value as a human baby. And I studied biology in college with the intentions of becoming an entomologist. I LOVE BUGS. But nope. Humans are special. They merit more respect than animals. I am against needless killing though so I do have a problem with trophy hunting. But killing to eat or use the fur? God, the Creator of all life, gave us animals for our use.
Anyways, I hate twitter but I couldn’t resist using such a crummy hashtag. Yeah, I was born after Roe no thanks to you Planned Parenthood!!!
There’s nothing in the Bible saying I have to kill or eat animals. We’re stewards of the earth, I can steward it by refusing to kill and torture animals for human wants. If someone has nothing to eat but meat I have no problem with them eating meat, but other than that I think it’s selfish and immoral personally.
A necessary war to protect your country would fall under self-defense, though I hope it could be done with as little killing and civilian casualties as possible.
no, the Bible doesn’t say you HAVE to kill and eat animals. I didn’t say it did. I’m saying the Bible says God created animals for man to have dominion over. God killed the first animals to use their skins to clothe Adam and Eve. So it isn’t WRONG to kill and eat animals. Not saying you have to, just saying it isn’t contrary to being pro-life to kill and eat animals.
I am anti animal abuse but I eat meat. I dont intend to stop. Although I think faux fur is just fine.