House GOP gives prominence to pro-life initiatives
The House GOP exerted momentous efforts to support the sanctity of human life this week.
First came the vote to repeal Obamacare, which passed 245-189. (Read LifeNews.com for Senate strategy.)
Then yesterday came the 3rd and 4th bills I recently identified as coming down the pike, and not in a mealy way. The No Tax-Payer Funding for Abortion Act was given one of the top 10 bill numbers, indicating its importance, HR 3. And Speaker Boehner held a press conference to roll it out. Politico reported:
Republicans are turning to abortion as a key issue to rally their base as they attempt to replace the Democrats’ health reform law.
The high-profile introduction of a Republican anti-abortion bill – just hours after the health repeal vote and prior to any legislation on jobs or economy – has groups on both sides of the issue gearing up for another aggressive fight.
The No Tax-Payer Funding for Abortion Act, introduced Thursday as H.R. 3, aims to codify the Hyde Amendment, which has long barred federal funding for abortion and must currently be renewed every year. The legislation was introduced in tandem with the Protect Life Act, sponsored by Energy & Commerce Health Subcommittee Chair Joseph Pitts (R-PA), that would specifically bar any federal funding for abortion under the health reform law.
“This common sense legislation reflects the will of the people and deserves the support of the House,” House Speaker John Boehner said at a Thursday morning press conference. “It’s one of highest legislative priorities and as such I’ve directed it receive the designation of H.R. 3.”
The new legislation will no doubt keep health reform on the front burner, as House Republicans look for specific provisions of the law they can tackle that will resonate with voters. While independent fact check organizations have concluded that the health reform does not allow for federal funding of abortion, Republicans remain insistent that the language is too loose and the possibility for funding does indeed remain.
The high-profile treatment of this taxpayer funding bill has abortion-rights supporters bracing for yet another battle on the Hill.
“This is a very serious threat,” Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards told Politico in a Thursday morning interview. “These folks have just taken office and this is what they’re focusing on…Based on what we’re seeing, just few days after the start of Congress, we’re absolutely ready for a very serious fight.”
To be sure, anti-abortion legislation is often introduced with much fanfare only to fizzle in committee, never making it to the House floor. Even the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Bill was introduced last session only to die in committee.
But those involved on both sides of the abortion issue say things are different in the 112th Congress for two key reasons: the high priority that Republicans have given the issue as well as the influx of anti-abortion members of Congress into both the House and Senate.
In a telling move, Speaker Boehner held his press conference to discuss the abortion legislation hours before an appearance with House committee chairs to outline their approach to dismantling the health reform law. The legislation was well-timed for anti-abortion activists, who will mark the 38th anniversary of Roe v. Wade on January 22 with their annual March for Life, scheduled for this coming Monday.
“Our members feel very strongly about the sanctity of human life,” Boehner said. “We listened to the American people. We made a commitment to the American people under the Pledge to America and we’re continuing to fulfill our commitment.”
Boehner himself has frequently spoken of his admiration of Rep. Henry Hyde, the anti-abortion Congressman after whom the Hyde Amendment is named. He was given Americans United for Life’s annual Defender of Life award this past summer.
The commitment to anti-abortion issues seems to be shared by the Republican House leadership. Their Pledge to America, an outline of their agenda released in September, included a promise to codify the Hyde Amendment. This was a striking departure from the Republicans’ 1994 Contract with America, which made no such mention of abortion policy.
“The fact that it is designated as HR 3 speaks volumes about priorities,” said Rep. Chris Smith (R-NJ), the main sponsor of the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Bill. “This leadership under speaker Boehner, right on down the line of the Republican leadership, believes in this. this is not about political expediency.”
“We intend to move that bill quickly through our committee,” Energy and Commerce Chair Fred Upton (R-MI) added at a Thursday press conference, on Republican plans to replace health reform.
Anti-abortion groups are buoyed by the new legislation, and the increasing focus on social issues that the new Republican leadership has so far demonstrated.
“The strongly pro-life House leadership is listening. Taxpayer funding of abortion in the health care bill was a defining issue in the mid-term election,” Susan B. Anthony List president Marjorie Dannenfelser said in a statement to Politico. “The House saw a net gain of 50 pro-life Members, sent to Washington to correct the injustice. The American people have called for laws that end taxpayer funding of abortion and the House is getting the job done.”…
Rep. Dan Lipinksi (D-IL), co-chair of the Congressional Pro-Life Caucus, pointed out at a Thursday Press Conference that some of health reform’s high risk insurance pools had initially planned to cover abortion as a benefit.
“There was going to be funding for abortion until that was pointed out and only because people were looking very closely at this,” he said.
The House of Representatives has 246 anti-abortion members, 155 who support abortion rights and 34 who fall somewhere in the middle, according to an analysis by NARAL Pro-Choice America. In the Senate, they rank 46 Senators as abortion opponents, 40 who support access and 14 who have a mixed records. If Senators who opposed abortion joined force with those who have a mixed record, it could potentially create a filibuster proof, 60-Senator majority.
“The Senate is moderate and has the opportunity to put the breaks on an anti-choice agenda,” NARAL president Nancy Keenan told Politico in an interview. “We’ll be working with them but we don’t take anything for granted.”
Jill Stanek is a nurse turned speaker, columnist and blogger, a national figure in the effort to protect both preborn and postborn innocent human life.
In one week it’s been Dr. Kermit “Scissorhands” Gosnell, pro-life legislation, and Roe v. Wade, all intersecting.
This is gonna get good.
I’m so proud to be an Anti!! Tomorrow is like our “pride parade” on the West Coast. We’re here, we’re pro-life, get used to it!!
This morning I happened to read the POLITICO piece referred to in the commentary above. The pro-aborts and their fellow traveler readers on POLITICO were out in force with their pro-abortion, anti-life, anti-Republican comments.
I am glad to see this action on the part of the Republican leadership and House! I am confident that the pro-life movement is on the side of truth and right. But speaking as one who got involved as a volunteer in the Right to Life movement in 1972, we still face now, as we did many years ago, great challenges. The battle still rages on the moral, spiritual, intellectual, cultural/social and political levels. Unfortunately, many of the influential institutions and personalities of this nation are still defending, and even promoting, the libertine anti-life position.
We must continue to persevere. At least the pro-life movement has institutions of its own in place now much more so than in the early 1970s. My own judgment is that we especially need a great spiritual and moral renewal at the foundations of our individual, family, community and national life. Upon this foundation we can better alter the cultural and political forces to bring about significant change.
Sam, I think you have a good point. Many Republican legislators vote against initiatives that would help the poor, especially poor children. This is disturbing to many pro-life people, including myself. There are some legislators that are consistently pro-life across the board, but they are unfortunately, few and far in-between.
“Sam, I think you have a good point. Many Republican legislators vote against initiatives that would help the poor, especially poor children. ”
Hi Sam/ Phillymiss,
You’ve prompted a response from me but please know that I’m not directing it only to you. I fear that the problem with government spending is that once they start, they don’t know when to stop. Republican politicians as a group are not anti-life post-birth and it’s really unfair to hear that from Democrats at every turn. It’s an emotional football that they love to throw around. Part of the conservative position is that government was never meant to be everything to every person. It’s up to each and every one of us to take care of our brothers and sisters who need a hand. We must remember that much is expected from those to whom much is given, and the least of us (in terms of wealth) must give from what we do have. I believe most people try to live this way. (Stepping off of my soap box now…)
Sam:
Not true.
Carder @ “In one week it’s been Dr. Kermit “Scissorhands” Gosnell, pro-life legislation, and Roe v. Wade, all intersecting.
This is gonna get good.”
Grab your popcorn and take a seat! God is working His wonders!